Thursday, August 9, 2018

Govt.’s argument that Marina is only for serving CMs falls flat

AUGUST 09, 2018 00:00 IST


High Court special hearing on a holiday wins the day for DMK

It was the 156-year-old Madras High Court which on Wednesday made sure that the mortal remains of the 94-year-old Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) patriarch and former Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi were laid to rest within the precincts of his political mentor C.N. Annadurai’s mausoleum at the Marina beach here.

The First Division Bench of Acting Chief Justice Huluvadi G. Ramesh and Justice S.S. Sundar allowed a writ petition filed by R.S. Bharathi, Organising Secretary of DMK, and quashed a press release issued by Chief Secretary Girija Vaidyanathan on Tuesday expressing inability to allocate space for the burial at the Marina.

The two judges directed the government to “provide a place for decent burial to lay the mortal remains (sic) of Late Dr. ‘Kalaignar’ M. Karunanidhi... on the Marina beach” and ordered that the exercise be carried out by the Chief Secretary as well as secretaries of Home, Public as well as Public Works departments forthwith.

Wednesday had been declared a holiday for the High Court in view of Karunanidhi’s death on Tuesday, yet the court held a special sitting to hear the case seeking a space for his mortal remains at the Marina. The hearing began as early as 8 a.m. and the orders were passed by 10.45 a.m. since the burial was scheduled on the same day.

Though the judges had dictated the facts of the case to their personal secretary even before the commencement of arguments by the senior counsel representing the petitioner as well as the State government, they, at the end of the hearing, released only the operative portion of their judgment “considering the exigency involved.”

A detailed judgment, containing the reasons for allowing the writ petition, “will follow,” they said.

Earlier, advocates S. Doraisamy of Thanthai Periyar Dravidar Kazhagam and K. Balu of PMK withdrew cases filed by them last year opposing a mausoleum for Jayalalithaa in the Marina.

Though activist ‘Traffic’ K.R. Ramaswamy had also filed a public interest litigation petition last year seeking a direction to shift the mausoleums of Annadurai, M.G. Ramachandran and Jayalalithaa out of the Marina beach, his counsel, on Tuesday refused to withdraw that case. However, he said he had ‘no objection’ to burying Karunanidhi’s body in the coastal area.

The counsel said the activist wanted to pursue the case to its logical end and get all the four mausoleums shifted out of Marina during the final hearing of his case. The Division Bench refused to accept such a submission and dismissed his writ petition after recording the statement that he had no objection to burial of Karunanidhi’s body in the Marina.

It was only thereafter that senior counsel P. Wilson, representing the writ petitioner, commenced his arguments. He contended that all top leaders of the Dravidian movement had been buried at the Marina, and therefore, it was not fair on the part of the State government to deny space at the beach for a five-time former Chief Minister of the State.

He contended that forcing the DMK leaders to bury the body of their party president next to Gandhi Mandapam at Sardar Patel Road here amounted to violation of the constitutional right to life which includes a right to decent burial after death. “Burying Kalaignar Karunanidhi next to Gandhi Mandapam cannot be termed as decent burial,” he argued.

‘Decent burial’

In his submissions, senior counsel Veera Kathiravan of the DMK said, “a loved one should be buried along with his mentor; only then it can be termed as a decent burial.” He also contended that the Union Home Ministry’s ‘Instructions regarding action to be taken on the death of high dignitaries’ had nothing to do with the place of burial.

However, in his reply, senior counsel C.S. Vaidyanathan, representing the State government, said, Karunanidhi himself, during his stint as Chief Minister, had understood well that mortal remains of former Chief Ministers could not be buried at the Marina beach, and therefore, he did not allot space there either for K. Kamaraj or Janaki Ramachandran.
One more IndiGo flight to Chennai

COIMBATORE, AUGUST 09, 2018 00:00 IST

IndiGo Airlines will add an additional flight on Coimbatore-Chennai sector from September.

A relief

The new flight is expected to be a relief for the people flying to Chennai and back after the Jet Airways pulled out all the four daily services to the State capital from July.

“We currently have five flights operating on this sector,” said Sakshi Batra from IndiGo’s corporate communication section.

Airport Authority of India officials said that an A320 flight may start operations on the sector from September 13. Currently Indigo (5), Air India (3) and Spice Jet (3) are operating daily services to Chennai.

Indigo and Spice are operating one additional service to Chennai on Tuesdays.
How he outwitted Morarji Desai, CS, Indira Gandhi

CHENNAI, AUGUST 09, 2018 00:00 IST

His repartees impressed everyone

When it came to wit, sharp repartees and wordplay, late DMK president M. Karunanidhi was a class act. And surprisingly, he was adept in both Tamil and English. Throughout his public life, which stretched several decades, there were examples galore of his amazing way with words.

In March 1969, a month after taking over as Chief Minister following his mentor C.N. Annadurai’s death, Karunanidhi had called on Deputy Prime Minister Morarji Desai, who held the Finance portfolio, and sought Rs. 5 crore as drought relief. Morarji reacted saying: “I don’t have money-growing trees in my garden.” Not to be taken aback, Karunanidhi retorted, “When there are no money-growing trees, how could they be found in your garden?”

Likewise, while holding seat-sharing talks with Congress (R) leaders for the 1971 general elections, Karunanidhi offered just 15 Assembly seats to Indira Gandhi’s party. Taking offence, senior Congress (R) leader C. Subramaniam reacted angrily, saying, “This is a challenge to our self-respect.” Karunanidhi cut him short, saying, “Our (DMK) movement itself is a Self-Respect Movement.” Eventually, the Congress (R) did not contest in the Assembly election, but was given 10 Lok Sabha seats.

After bitterly opposing Indira Gandhi for four years, in September 1979, he went to her house to discuss an alliance for the 1980 Lok Sabha polls.

While seeing him off, Indira Gandhi said, “We are opening a new chapter,” to which he responded, “No, no! We are continuing the old chapter.” [He was referring to the 1971 alliance with her].

During the Emergency, when DMK functionaries were jailed, he sent Rs. 200 per month to their families through the party office. Later, when Vetrikondan, a firebrand platform speaker, complained to him that his wife had received only Rs. 100, Karunanidhi explained that he had sent the other Rs. 100 to Vetrikondan’s second wife. Recalling this incident at a party conference in Villupuram in September 2003, he jocularly remarked, “I did that because I too have two wives.” Even at press conferences, he would come up with witty responses, sometimes laced with sarcasm, to uncomfortable questions. When a scribe at a press meet said, “Ramadoss (PMK leader) is demanding the opening of toddy shops,” the then Chief Minister pointed to the PMK leader’s namesake among the journalists, and asked, “Who, this Ramadoss, is it?” In 1998, after the AIADMK-BJP tie-up, Karunanidhi’s nephew Murasoli Maran had observed that no party was politically untouchable, triggering a controversy. When asked about this, Karunanidhi cryptically shot back, “There is a difference between touching and sharing a bed.” The next year, DMK joined the BJP-led NDA government.
Suspended Anna varsity faculty seeks bail

CHENNAI, AUGUST 09, 2018 00:00 IST



The DVAC had booked a case against the petitioner in the cash-for-marks scam.File Photo 

‘Exams were held in a fair and transparent manner’



Suspended Anna University faculty G.V. Uma, 47, has filed an anticipatory bail petition in the Madras High Court in a case booked against her by Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) on the charge of having taken huge amount of money as bribe from students to boost their scores during revaluation of answer scripts. The offence had allegedly been committed when she served as the Controller of Examinations last year.

The anticipatory bail plea has been listed for hearing before Justice M. Dhandapani on Thursday. In her affidavit, the petitioner said, she held the post of Controller of Examinations between March 3, 2015 and March 2, 2018.

Petitioner’s claim

During the period, she conducted the examinations for the students of the university as well as those of affiliated colleges in a fair and transparent manner without giving room for remarks from any quarters.

In 2017, it was decided to conduct central evaluation of answer scripts at Tindivanam to make it fool proof. The evaluation process was supervised by Additional Controller of Examinations, Deputy Controller of Examinations, 23 zonal coordinators and many zonal officers apart from herself. The evaluation and revaluation were done as per well laid down norms of the university and the petitioner could not bend those rules in any way.

“The petitioner can neither influence the examiners nor the officers to award favourable marks to any student. Further the respondent (DVAC) has not conducted proper enquiry and had opted to pick and choose method of arraying the petitioners in the crime. The petitioner is an innocent person and has not committed any offence or much less offence as detailed by the defacto complainant,” her affidavit read.
Nursing college puts curbs on beard

BENGALURU, AUGUST 09, 2018 00:00 IST

Principal bars four students from attending classes, cites ‘hygiene’

Four students from Jammu & Kashmir, who were enrolled in a nursing college in Bengaluru, were left in the lurch after the principal allegedly barred them from attending classes until they shaved their beards. Citing ‘hygiene’ as the reason, the principal, who had joined the college a little less than a month ago, informed the students that their internal marks would be affected if they failed to comply.

The alleged discrimination was faced by students of Adarsh College of Nursing in Mariyappana at Mallathahalli.

Three of the students are in the first year B.Sc. course while the fourth is in his second year. They told The Hindu that the principal summoned them and asked them to shave the beard if they wanted to be marked in their internals.

‘No problem at the time of admission’

“For the past week, we are being sent out of class on instructions from the principal for not shaving our beard. The management was fine with our beards when we filled the admission form. All of a sudden, the principal, who joined 20 days ago, asked us to shave. She barred us from entering class. The beards are a part of our faith,” said one student.
SC raps HP govt for bringing up judge’s wife

Dhananjay.Mahapatra@timesgroup.com

New Delhi:09.08.2018

In an unusual development on Wednesday, during hearing of a case relating to encroachments in Himachal Pradesh, the state’s counsel invited the Supreme Court’s ire when he pointed out that a PIL on a similar issue filed by the wife of one of the judges on the bench is pending in the high court.

The court was hearing a suo motu criminal contempt case relating to an official being shot dead while leading an anti-encroachment drive in Kasauli when the state’s counsel Abhinav Mukerji informed a bench of Justices Madan B Lokur, Abdul S Nazeer and Deepak Gupta informing that a writ petition filed by Punam Gupta, wife of Justice Gupta, on encroachments in forest land was pending in the Himachal Pradesh HC.

Justice Lokur asked why the state government was raising this issue and whether it had nothing better to do? He then asked Mukerji whether he had gone through the pending PIL, to which the counsel replied in the negative. Justice Lokur said it was shocking that the state government had to take this stand before the court when it would do well to concentrate on governance. The bench told Mukerji that he as a lawyer was officer of the court first and should not become the mouthpiece of the state government.
WhatsApp limits number of forwards for Indian users

Rachel.Chitra@timesgroup.com

Bengaluru:09.08.2018

WhatsApp on Wednesday officially rolled out a limit of only five forwards at a time for Indian users in a bid to curb the spread of fake news and provocative content. With the rise in lynchings based on fake news, the social media platform has come in for widespread criticism.

The new limit is applicable only for its 200 million users in India. The move was announced by WhatsApp last month. “The limit has started to appear this week for people in India who are on the current version of WhatsApp. This week, WhatsApp is publishing a new video that explains the importance of the ‘forward’ label and calls users to ‘double check’ the facts when you’re not sure who created the original message,” said the company.

Now, if you try to forward a message to a sixth person at one go, the app tells you that you can only forward to five people. But a user can go back to the message and forward it again to another five contacts/ groups. So it does not stop mass forwards, but makes it more difficult for the user.

For WhatsApp, India is its largest user base with people forwarding more content than in any other country. The forwards are typically ‘good morning’ messages, funny videos, and photos. But sometimes there’s inflammatory content. On July1, TOI reported that a single WhatsApp rumour on child lifters resulted in the lynching of 22 people in 10 different states.

NEWS TODAY 27.06.2026