Monday, June 28, 2021

Presently absent or absently present?


CITY LIGHTS

Presently absent or absently present?

“Present, Miss” said a new voice when the attendance was called out. The surprised teacher asked the student where he had been for the last three weeks of school. "This is the first time you have attended class since we opened school in the first week of June," said the miffed teacher. To which the student squeaked, "Miss, I have been attending my old school for the last three weeks. I didn’t know that my parents had switched me to a new school for Class XI. And I promise I've been present every day but over there.” The mystified ‘Miss’ had nothing to say. Clearly, another of the travails of remote learning. And to think the school year has just begun!

— Kamini Mathai

Casual sexism meets veggie shopping

A mobile vendor selling vegetables and fruits recently had a crash course on casual sexism as it seems many expect only women to do the shopping. The vendor in question drove into an apartment complex in Nungambakkam and called out the customary ‘Vaanga ma vaanga’. A few minutes later, he drove to another building nearby when a woman came running behind him with a basket in hand. She said, “Why do you always say ‘vaanga ma vaanga’ and call only the women? My husband uses this as a silly excuse to refuse to go out and buy vegetables. I have to take care of my children and by the time I come out after looking for a mask, you are gone.” The visibly awkward vendor said, “I will wait for a few more minutes in every block hereafter, madam.”

— U Tejonmayam

A short-lived respite

Many residents are going through lockdown fatigue. But not those in a certain neighbourhood in Thilaiganga Nagar and Jeevan Nagar. For them, the lockdown has offered some peace of mind as the restrictions made the giant piling machines working to build the metro fall silent for almost two months. Early this year, they rejoiced when work started on the MRTS after more than a decade’s wait. However, the joy soon turned sour when huge, noisy, piling machines started boring the earth, disturbing their peace. Then the lockdown began, restoring the serenity of the neighbourhood. But now restrictions have eased, and with the state government allowing construction work, they looked with trepidation as workers arrived to move the piling machines and brought more loads of steel bars for concreting. Till the next lockdown, life is going to be jarring for good.

— V Ayyappan

Council matters

On June 21, governor Banwarilal Purohit in his address to the state assembly announced a five-member Economic Advisory Council, surprising people across the country. The names included Nobel laureate Esther Duflo and prof Jean Dreze, besides former RBI governor Raghuram Rajan, former economic adviser to the Centre Arvind Subramanian and former Union finance secretary S Narayan. Naturally, everyone was curious whose idea it was to form a council with such high-profile economists. “The idea did not come from the bureaucracy. It came from the political executive. It came right from the top,” a senior state government official told this journalist. "Given his background, the finance minister, PTR Palanivel Thiagarajan, would have reached out to connect with them too," said the official.

— D Govardan

Lockdown woes

When this reporter had to move into a new house and needed the help of carpenters, electricians, plumbers, little did she know it would be a huge challenge. She had to scout for more than two weeks to find them. And then it turned out that most of these workers either did not have the necessary equipment or charged double the usual price. With the pandemic and numerous lockdowns, most had moved to smaller cities or sectors that give more job security. Paying rent for accommodation in the city is very difficult, especially during extended lockdown, said a carpenter. Though the state has eased rules and let these workers move around, the demand for their services has dropped significantly.

— Mamtha Asokan

Sunday, June 27, 2021

Breaking- Criticizing Bar Council Decisions Amounts To Misconduct: BCI Amends Rules 'To Improve Standards Of Professional Conduct & Etiquette For Advocates'


Breaking- Criticizing Bar Council Decisions Amounts To Misconduct: BCI Amends Rules 'To Improve Standards Of Professional Conduct & Etiquette For Advocates'


26 Jun 2021 8:33 PM

"The Decision of any State Bar Council or Bar Council of India shall not be criticized or attacked by any Member/s of Bar Council in public domain"

The Bar Council of India has amended rules to make 'criticism' and 'attack' of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.

The Amended Rules, which have been notified in the Gazette on Friday (25th June 2021), says that an Advocate shall conduct himself/herself as a gentleman/gentle lady in his/her day to day life and he/she shall not do any unlawful act.

He/she shall not make any statement in the Print, Electronic or Social Media, which is indecent or derogatory, defamatory or motivated, malicious or mischievous against any Court or Judge or any member of Judiciary, or against State Bar Council or Bar Council of India nor shall any Advocate engage in any willful violation, disregard or defiance of any resolution or order of the State Bar Council or Bar Council of India and any such act/conduct shall amount to misconduct and such Advocates would be liable to be proceeded with under Section-35 or 36 of the Advocates' Act, 1961, the Rules read.

The Council states that the amendments are made to address issues with regard to misconduct by Advocate/s and to improve the standards of professional conduct and etiquette for Advocates.

The following are important takeaways:

Advocate shall conduct himself/herself as a gentleman/gentle lady in his/her day to day life

An Advocate shall conduct himself/herself as a gentleman/gentle lady in his/her day to day life and he/she shall not do any unlawful act, he/she shall not make any statement in the Print, Electronic or Social Media, which is indecent or derogatory, defamatory or motivated, malicious or mischievous against any Court or Judge or any member of Judiciary, or against State Bar Council or Bar Council of India nor shall any Advocate engage in any willful violation, disregard or defiance of any resolution or order of the State Bar Council or Bar Council of India and any such act/conduct shall amount to misconduct and such Advocates would be liable to be proceeded with under Section-35 or 36 of the Advocates' Act, 1961

Code of conduct and Disqualification for members of Bar Councils

(i) No Member of any State Bar Council or of Bar Council of India shall be permitted to publish anything or to make any Statement or Press-Release in Print, Electronic or Social Media against any Resolution or Order of concerned State Bar Council or Bar Council of India or to make/use any derogatory or abusive language/comment/s/ word/s against the Bar Council or its office-bearers or members.


(ii) The Decision of any State Bar Council or Bar Council of India shall not be criticized or attacked by any Member/s of Bar Council in public domain.

(iii) No Advocate or any Member of any State Bar Council or the Bar Council of India shall undermine the dignity or authority of the State Bar Council or Bar Council of India.

Violation amounts to Misconduct, can result in disqualification, suspension or removal

"The Violation of this above mentioned clause (i) to (iii) of this code of conduct may amount to other misconduct under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961, and /or violation of Section-V and/or V-A shall result in suspension or removal of membership of such member from the Bar Council. The Bar Council of India may declare such Advocates (as mentioned above in Section-V) or any Member of Bar Council to be disqualified from contesting the elections of any Bar Association or Bar Council for any period, depending on the gravity of the misconduct. The State Bar Council/s may refer the matters of misconduct or violation of these Rules by any of its members to Bar Council of India.", the Rules add.

The Rules clarify that a healthy and bona-fide criticism made in good faith, shall not be treated as a "misconduct".

Procedure for declaring disqualification

For declaring any Advocate or Member of Bar Council as disqualified from contesting the elections as aforesaid, Bar Council of India shall be required to hold an inquiry by a "3 Member Committee" headed by a Former Chief Justice or a former Judge of any High Court. The Committee shall be constituted by the Bar Council of India and may consist of any member of Bar Council of India or a Member or Office-Bearer of any State Bar Council or any Advocate with a minimum of 25 years of standing at the Bar.

After any such reference of any case by Bar Council of India, the committee shall issue notice to the concerned Advocate(s)/ Member(s) and give him/her/them opportunity of hearing. Bar Council of India shall take its decision after consideration of the report of the Committee.
The proceedings for disqualification before the Bar Council of India and/or the Committee/s constituted by it shall follow the norms of natural Justice and it will be deemed to be an order passed under Section 49(1)(a) or 49(1)(ab).

"A Senior Citizen is Entitled To Live In peace In His Own House Under Art 21”:Calcutta High Court Orders Eviction Of Son And Daughter In Law

"A Senior Citizen is Entitled To Live In peace In His Own House Under Art 21”:Calcutta High Court Orders Eviction Of Son And Daughter In Law: TheCalcutta High Court last week vide order dated 17.6.2021 extended policeprotection to an eld

Facing a greedy private hospital? Know your legal recourse

Facing a greedy private hospital? Know your legal recourse

The State government had graded private hospitals based on infrastructure, bed strength, and other facilities.

Published: 25th June 2021 07:12 AM 

By Express News Service

In this final article of the Trick-or-Treat series, Express aims to refresh readers’ memory of the Government Order (G.O.) that limited the maximum that hospitals can charge for Covid treatment. Issued on May 22 in response to many complaints of hospitals fleecing patients, the G.O had also warned of punitive action against erring private hospitals. Salient points of the G.O. are as follows:

Under the Chief Minister’s Comprehensive Health Insurance Scheme (CMCHIS), non-critical cases without oxygen support can be charged Rs 5,000 a day; non-critical cases with oxygen support can be charged Rs 15,000 a day; cases requiring ICU facility with invasive ventilation can be charged Rs 35,000 a day; cases requiring ICU facility with non-invasive ventilation, CPAP, and BiPAP oxygen devices can be charged Rs 30,000 a day; and cases requiring ICU facility with only oxygen support can be charged Rs 25,000 a day. The cost of medicines and other ICU tests will also be borne by government.

As for those not covered under the CMCHIS, non-critical cases not requiring oxygen support can be charged Rs 7,500 a day at Grade A1 and A2 hospitals, and Rs 5,000 at Grade A3 to A6 hospitals. In the same category, non-critical cases requiring oxygen support can be charged Rs 15,000 a day; those requiring ICU facility with non-invasive ventilation, CPAP, and BiPAP oxygen devices can be charged Rs 30,000 a day; cases requiring ICU facility with invasive ventilation can be charged Rs 35,000 a day; and those requiring ICU facility with only oxygen support can be charged Rs 25,000 a day. The State government had graded private hospitals based on infrastructure, bed strength, and other facilities.

Patients who wish to receive treatment in private hospitals under the CMCHIS, now require no referral form from a government doctor. Hospitals that breach these rules will be punished. The Coimbatore district administration has so far barred two such private hospitals from offering Covid treatment to patients.

Active cases below 45k, same as last October

Active cases below 45k, same as last October

TIMES NEWS NETWORK

Chennai:27.06.2021

Even as 5,415 new infections were reported on Saturday, active case loadin Tamil Nadu dropped below 45,000 to 44,924. This took the cumulative case tally to 24.6 lakh. The148 deaths increased the toll in the state to 32,199.

Saturday’s new cases includes 205 instances of children aged12 and below. The last time Tamil Nadu had cases below 45,000 was on October 8, 2020, when the number of people under treatment dropped to 44,437 after it hit a peak on July 31with 57,968 cases.

Coimbatore continued to be the hotspot with 671 fresh Covid-19 cases. It was followed by its neighbour Erode with 574, Tirupathur 380, Salem 369 and Tirupur 337. The seven northern districts added 1,023 new cases, followed by central districts with 816 cases. With 314 cases reported in Chennai, the city and its neighbours — Chengalpet, Kancheepuram and Tiruvallur together added 780. The 10 southern districts added 613 new cases.

Around 47% (2,527) of the new cases on Saturday were from the eight western districts. This has taken the number of people under treatment in these districts to 19,935, around 44% of the state’s active cases. This includes 6,122 active cases in Coimbatore, 4,509 in Erode, 2,598 in Salem, 2,052 in Namakkal and 2,021in Tirupur.

Chennai, with 3,590 active cases, and its three neighbouring districts with 7,298 people stillunder treatment.Theeight central districts have 6,811 active cases. This includes 2,204 in Thanjavur, 1,052 in Trichy and 770 in Karur. The northern districts have 5,923 people under treatment including 1,339 in Cuddalore, 1,196 in Kallakurichi and 1,156 in Tiruvannamalai. The southern districts have the least active cases with 4,955. This includes 757 in Virudhunagar, 679 in Sivaganga and 619 in Madurai.

Vellore reported the most number of deaths at 19 on Saturday. The western districts reported 48 deaths, while the north had 37 succumbing to the infection. Chennai and its neighbours reported 22 deaths. Southern districts too reported 22 deaths, central had19 deaths. At least 7,661 people were discharged, taking the total discharged to 23.8 lakh.

50% weightage for Class X score in TN Class XII marks

50% weightage for Class X score in TN Class XII marks

For Those Unhappy With Marks, Exam After Covid Ends

Ragu.Raman@timesgroup.com

Chennai:27.06.2021

Chief minister M K Stalin on Saturday announced the evaluation criteria to compute marks for state board Class XII students by fixing 50% weightage for Class X board exam marks, 30% for Class XII internal assessment and practical exams, and 20% weightage for Class XI marks.

The average of the best of three marks scored by students in any of the Class X board subjects would be taken for arriving at the weightage, a government release said. The state education board would also give opportunity for students who are aggrieved with their marks to write an exam after the pandemic and that would be considered as their final Class XII score. Marks will be declared for nearly 8.5 lakh Class XII students before July 31 as ordered by the Supreme Court.

The evaluation method announced by TN is different from that of the CBSE which gave almost equal weightage to Class X, XI exams and XII preboard tests (30:30:40).

Explaining the rationale behind more weightage for Class X marks, school education minister Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi said students had appeared for Class X exams in a non-pandemic year after attending physical classes. “The Class XI exams conducted last year too was affected by the pandemic. The present method was chosen by the chief minister keeping in mind the interest of rural students, urban students, toppers and average students,” he said. The formula was fixed based on the report submitted by a10-member committee.


Exam for pvt candidates after Covid

The state board would conduct a separate exam for private candidates after the Covid-19 pandemic subsides.

State board schools completed practical exams for Class XII students before April. The Class XII practical exam marks (20 marks) and internal assessment (10 marks) will be calculated for 30 marks. If the subject doesn’t have practical exams, then the internal assessment marks will be converted into 30 marks.

Further, if the students could not take part in Class XII practical exams due to Covid-19, their Class XI marks will be used for tabulation. If students could not attend both Class XI and XII practical exams, their practical marks would be calculated based on Class X and Class XI theory exam marks. If students had failed in a subject in Class XI, they will be awarded 35 marks considering the Covid-19 situation.

Students who did not take part in theory exam, internal assessment and practical exam in Class XI and XII would be considered as private candidates, the release added.

Saturday, June 26, 2021

Customer ‘without mask’ shot at by bank guard


Customer ‘without mask’ shot at by bank guard

Kanwardeep.Singh@timesgroup.com

Bareilly:26.06.2021 

A railway employee, in his 40s, who had gone to the bank to get his passbook updated was shot in the leg by the security guard there for not wearing a face mask. The incident occurred in the Civil Lines area of Bareilly on Friday and a purported video has gone viral.

Rajesh Rathore, who works with the telecom department of Indian Railways, has been admitted to a private hospital. Inspector general (Bareilly range) Ramit Sharma along with senior police officials rushed to the spot and carried out an investigation.

Rajesh’s wife Priyanka told TOI, “My husband had gone to the Bank of Baroda branch. He was not wearing a mask and was denied entry. After some time, he returned with a mask, but the same guard again denied him entry, saying it was lunch time. It was 11.30 am then. He then pushed my husband and shot him with his gun. No one at the bank helped my husband who made a call on my daughter’s mobile phone and informed us about the incident. I rushed to the bank where my husband was lying on the floor while none of the bank officials bothered to help him. I took him to hospital in an e-rickshaw.”

In a statement, the Bank of Baroda said, “We deeply regret the unfortunate firing incident that took place at Station Road branch, Bareilly, today as a result of a reported altercation between the guard and the victim. The injured has been immediately admitted in the district hospital and is reportedly out of danger.”

NEWS TODAY 07.07.2026