Wednesday, September 8, 2021

Won’t suspend govt staff on last working day: CM


Won’t suspend govt staff on last working day: CM

08.09.2021

Chief minister M K Stalin on Tuesday said the state government would end the practice of suspending government employees facing disciplinary action and other charges on their last working day. In a statement in the assembly, the CM announced a slew of measures, including advancing disbursement of hike in dearness allowance by three months, which will entail an additional expenditure of ₹620 crore a year, regularize the strike and suspension periods of government employees who participated in strikes in 2016, 2017 and 2019. The state will also cancel disciplinary actions initiated against teachers for such strike and in cases where promotion is affected, they will be rectified, the CM said.

DHANALAKSHMI SRINIVASAN JOB NOTIFICATION





 

Karpagam Faculty of Pharmacy Notification






 

‘Write judgments with clarity on laws & facts’


‘Write judgments with clarity on laws & facts’

SC Concerned Over Some HC Judges’ Verdicts

AmitAnand.Choudhary@timesgroup.com

New Delhi:08.09.2021

The Supreme Court on Tuesday underscored the need for high court judges to be clear and precise on facts and laws while writing verdicts, saying that “it is not adequate that a decision is accurate, it must also be reasonable, logical and easily comprehensible”.

Expressing concern over some of the judgments written by HC judges, a bench of Justices D Y Chandrachud and M R Shah said it was very difficult to appreciate what the judge wants to convey through the judgment and the court is forced to remand the case for fresh consideration.

Observing that a verdict, delivered by Allahabad HC while granting bail to five life convicts, lacked clarity, the bench said that it is very unfortunate that the SC bench has to explain how the judgment should be written and and what should be contained in it. The SC set aside the bail orders.

“A judgment should be coherent, systematic and logically organised. It should enable the reader to trace the fact to a logical conclusion on the basis of legal principles. It is pertinent to examine the important elements in a judgment in order to fully understand the art of reading a judgment,” the bench said.

“The judgment replicates the individuality of the judge and therefore it is indispensable that it should be written with care and caution. The reasoning in the judgment should be intelligible and logical. Clarity and precision should be the goal. All conclusions should be supported by reasons duly recorded. The findings and directions should be precise and specific. Writing judgments is an art (and) involves skilful application of law and logic,” the bench said. Though the bench said that it is conscious that judges are overburdened with work, but said that quality can never be sacrificed for quantity.

“...whenever a judgment is written, it should have clarity on facts; on submissions made on behalf of the rival parties; discussion on law points and thereafter reasoning and the ultimate conclusion and findings and the operative portion of the order. There must be a clarity on the final relief granted. “ it said.

Observing that a verdict, delivered by Allahabad HC while granting bail to five life convicts, lacked clarity, the bench said that it is very unfortunate that the SC bench has to explain how the judgment should be written and and what should be contained in it

TN AGRI UNIVERSITY ADMISSIONS 2021-22





 

Retd govt bank employee ties himself to tree to protest felling

Retd govt bank employee ties himself to tree to protest felling

Shivani.Azad@timesgroup.com

Dehradun:08.09.2021

Shoppers at a major market in Rishikesh were greeted with a strange sight on Tuesday morning — an elderly man tied to a tree. Hemant Gupta, a retired senior clerk at a government bank, sat quietly under a peepal tree, a yellow rope wrapped around his torso.

The 64-year-old man had sent multiple letters to authorities to protest against trees that were being felled for a national highway. When he didn’t hear back from them, he decided to take matters into his own hands. “I want to make sure they don’t fell another tree. I’m not against the development of the highway but we must find a way to preserve the trees, perhaps, transplant the younger ones elsewhere,” said Gupta.

Gupta is ready to “adopt” the trees and exhaust his savings to bear their transplantation and maintenance expenses. “I will break my fixed deposits if I have to. But our environment must be protected,” he said.

Full report on www.toi.in

SILENT PROTEST: Hemant Gupta under the peepal tree

Jayaraj-Bennix case: SC refuses bail to two cops


Jayaraj-Bennix case: SC refuses bail to two cops

TIMES NEWS NETWORK

Chennai:08.09.2021

The Supreme Court has declined to grant bail to two police officers – inspector S Sridhar and sub-inspector P Raghu Ganesh – in connection with the death of trader P Jayaraj and his son J Bennix in June 2020 due to custodial torture by Sathankulam police in Tuticorin district. “…considering the facts and circumstances, at this stage, we are not inclined to interfere with the high court’s order refusing bail,” held a division bench of Justice Vineet Sarann and Justice Dinesh Maheshwari on Tuesday.

On June 19, 2020, Jayaraj, 59, and Bennix, 31, were picked up by Sathankulam police on charges of keeping their mobile phone shop open during pandemic lockdown hours. Due to brutal third-degree treatment in custody, the two suffered severe injuries. While still in judicial custody, Bennix died at Kovilpatti hospital on June 22, and Jayaraj died the next day. Owing to public uproar, Tamil Nadu government handed over the case to CBI, which has filed chargesheet as well. Trial is on at present.

On Tuesday, S Nagamuthu, senior counsel representing inspector Sridhar and Raghu Ganesh, argued in the Supreme Court that the father-son duo did not die due to the injuries sustained at the police station, and that they died due to respiratory illness and heart ailment. As the accused officers would not abscond, they should be enlarged on bail, he argued.

Additional solicitor general KM Natraj, representing the CBI, however, pointed to photographs and forensic reports and said there were at least 18 injuries recorded on the victims’ bodies.

Senior advocate Indira Jaisingh, representing Bennix’s mother, said the two officers were very much present at the station when the victims were being tortured. Noting that two eye witnesses have gathered courage and gave statements against their senior officers, Jaisingh said enlarging the police officers on bail at this stage would collapse the trial.

NEWS TODAY 07.07.2026