NRI students prefer Anna University

Chennai: ECE (Electrical and Communication Engineering), Computer Science and Mechanical Engineering were the subjects most favored by non-resident Indian students during the counselling at Anna University on Thursday.Of the 101 candidates who attended the counseling, 97 have taken admission under NRI category at three different collegesCollege of Engineering Guindy, MIT Chrompet and Alagappa College of Technology.

There is 5 per cent reservation in each of these colleges for NRI category.K. Shobiita had been staying in Doha in Qatar for the past seven years. She has already cleared in Carnegie Mellon in US in Pennsylvania.Yet she wanted to come to Anna University to check her status. “I am undecided whether to go to the U.S. or study in India. I got Computer Science here,” she said. But her mother believes Anna University is a good institution for her. “Anna University is a very reputed one.

It was a dream to make her study in this college,” Shobita’s mother said.. Nisha from Singapore came for counselling for the same reason as her father thinks that Anna University is the best college to be at.

GMC Chanda: MCI’s rejection sans re-inspection deliberate?

NAGPUR: The decision of Medical Council of India (MCI) to reject permission to Chandrapur Government Medical College (GMC) to fill up 100 MBBS seats has raised many doubts. MCI rejected the permission without physically conducting a re-inspection even after it was directed to do so by the union ministry for health and family welfare, say college authorities. MCI was censured by the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court on Wednesday, stating that MCI officials had used their "supernatural powers" to inspect the GMC from sitting in their AC chambers in New Delhi.

The Maharashtra government's affidavit filed by Chandrapur GMC dean Pradeep Dixit reveals how MCI "deliberately" reported about presence of 274 beds to union ministry, despite the fact that it had 300 beds since 2006. MCI pointed out 24 deficiencies in the college in an inspection it conducted there on December 29 and 30 last year. The government reduced a majority of the shortcomings.

Dixit's affidavit, which contained photographs of actual conditions, clearly proved that they tried hard to improve the infrastructure as required by the apex body for medical education. MCI chairman Jayashree Mehta did not answer TOI's calls seeking comments.

Counsel for petitioners Anil Kilor clarified the procedure of inspection, while blaming MCI for deliberately neglecting GMC's genuine claims. A new medical college must fulfill five basic criteria including 25-acre land, finance, well-equipped building, adequate faculty and a 300-bed hospital for getting a permission to start the academic session. Other requirements like hostels can be built eventually after getting permission. In government colleges, land and finances are considered so seriously, but the number of beds is thoroughly verified.

"The surgery department of GMC Chandrapur has 90 beds and gynaecology has 40. During MCI's inspection, there were more patients of gynaecology on that day which were shifted to surgery ward. The MCI inspector didn't count 26 beds of surgery ward which were allocated to gynaecology patients. He noted 64 beds in surgery but failed to add 40 beds of gynaecology, thus he marked 274 beds, instead of 300 which were in existence since 2006," Kilor said.

GMC officials told TOI that despite GMC authorities' demand for a hearing, MCI ignored their pleas. At a hearing with the union health ministry, GMC officials provided the entire list of infrastructure and facilities and also detailed how the college had removed all deficiencies that MCI had pointed out. The ministry then asked MCI to conduct a re-inspection by going to Chandrapur and submit a report before April 15.

But the MCI cited a Supreme Court verdict that observed that there was no need for inspection, if the college fails to make any of the five necessary requirements like the number of beds. MCI also took legal opinion from the additional solicitor general by allegedly misinforming him. All this led to the ministry rejecting GMC's genuine claims which otherwise would have been a big loss to 100 students from Vidarbha, officials said.

MCI INSPECTION: MANY QUESTIONS REMAIN UNANSWERED


MCI: THESE ARE THE DEFICIENCIES

1. Deficiency of Faculty - 41%

2. Deficiency of Residents - 44%

3. Out of 90 beds only 64 beds are available in surgery department

4. Demo rooms not available in ward area

5. College building is yet to be constructed, dean/principal office functions from hospital, staff room, college council hall

6. Lecture theatres and library is to be constructed

7. There are no books and journals

8. Staff is not available

9. UG Hostel not present

10. Resident doctors hostel absent

11. Nurses hostel are to be constructed

12. Residential quarters for teaching and non-teaching staff not there

13. OPD Registration counter - computer not working on day of inspection. Also no. of rooms for examination of patients (required four for all departments) are not available

14. Laboratory investigation workload is inadequate

15. MRD: It is located in one half of a hall; in other half there is a library without any wall or partition

16. Casualty: Disaster trolley, crash cart, defibrillator, ventilator not available

17. OT: Only three are available against requirement of four. Monitoring and resuscitation equipment are inadequate as detailed in report

18. Mobile X-ray 30 mA: Not available and AERB approval for X-ray machine not made available

19. Intercom is available but not working

20. Nursing Staff - 164 nurses are available against requirement of 175

21. College website not available

22. College building is yet to be constructed. Hence department of anatomy, biochemistry, physiology are not available

23. All teachers have been transferred from GMC Nagpur on December 9, 2014

24. No proper joining report is there and declaration forms are also incomplete

GMC: NO DEFICIENCIES EXCEPT THESE POINTS

3. Presence of additional beds in OBGY not mentioned in Inspectors Assessment report. Hence, total number of beds shown in assessor's report A-II is shown as 274 in the table instead of available 300 as shown in sentence above the table

15. Now complete hall will be utilized for MRD. Hence no deficiencies

18. a) New machine proposed this financial year and b) Sanction awaited

19. Sanction awaited. However individual phone lines are present

22. Equipments will be ready as per undertaking


DEFICIENCIES POINTED OUT IN ASSESSMENT REPORT

1. Playground and gymnasium not available

2. Capacity of teaching area in each department (30 students/departments required)

3. No proper boards displayed for various clinics

4. On the date of assessment OPD attendance/casualty attendance/indoor admissions are low

5. On the day of assessment operative works are low

6. Minor OT available but not functioning

7. Equipment not available in OT Block-Defibrillator/Multipara Monitor with Capnograph/Infusion Pumps

8. Static X-ray 500mA: Not available

9. PNDT Approval; Not made available

10. RHTC - No Government order has been shown nor it has been annexed hence not visited by Assessors. As per MCI norms only identification must at LOP inspection

11. UHTC - No Government order has been shown nor it has been annexed hence not visited by Assessors. As per MCI norms only identification is must at LOP inspection

Chennai flouts helmet rule, cops hapless..times of india

In the week since the court-mandated drive against two-wheeler riders not wearing hel mets began on July 1, police booked close to 7,200 cases across Chennai. That is a little more than 1,000 cases a day, a substantial number of which involved police impounding the offender's vehicle.
Senior police officers are convinced that they are doing a fine job. The situation on the road, however, wouldn't warrant such confidence because motorists are only getting bolder with every passing day .

A large number of motorbike riders simply place their helmets on the petrol tank or strap them to the handle bar so they can put them on in a jiffy when they spot a traffic policeman.

Away from the main roads, where there are no checkpoints, motorists have no fear whatsoever of breaking the helmet rule. Most users of two-wheelers are now aware of where police set up check points and easily avoid them. But they may not be able to do that for much longer.

"We have asked each sub-inspector to choose three to four locations and keep rotating between them," a senior police officer said.

But a police officer at Guindy told TOI that senior officers had specifically directed them not to check for violations of the rule and impound vehicles on all stretches because that would not allow them to regulate traffic.

Asked why the traffic police cannot enforce a strict crackdown, he said, "We have been advising and warning people on the issue for six months but no bothers to pay heed. It's not possible to enforce a crackdown indefinitely . How long can we keep doing the same thing? It's ultimately up to motorists to realise the danger of not wearing helmets."

Senior police officers say they constantly remind constables and sub-inspectors about the need to wear helmets themselves. "We have also put up signs and banners across the city , asking those who use twowheelers to wear helmets," an officer said. "We send text messages to people reminding them about the rule."

Police also face logistical limitations. They book 1,000 cases daily , but the courts can dispose of only 300 to 350 cases day , the officer said.

"With a big backlog, we also have a pile up of seized vehicles and documents," he said. "But the pressure is on us to enforce the rule come what may ."

தவறான உத்தரவை திருத்திக்கொள்ளும் துணிச்சல் தேவை: உயர் நீதிமன்றம்

தவறுதலாக உத்தரவு பிறப்பித்துவிட்டால், அந்தத் தவறை திருத்திக் கொள்ளும் துணிச்சல் நீதித் துறைக்கு தேவை என்று சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் தெரிவித்தது.
தமிழக அரசுத் துறைகளில் பணியாற்றும் வாகன ஓட்டுநர்களுக்கு 5-ஆவது ஊதிய குழு அடிப்படையில் தமிழக அரசு சம்பளம் நிர்ணயம் செய்தது. இதுதொடர்பாக ஓட்டுநர்கள் சிலர் சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் வழக்கு தொடுத்தனர்.
இந்த வழக்கை விசாரித்த உயர் நீதிமன்றம், கடந்த 2008-ஆம் ஆண்டு ஓர் உத்தரவு பிறப்பித்தது. அந்த உத்தரவின்படி, அந்த ஓட்டுநர்களுக்கு ரூ. 5 ஆயிரம் முதல் ரூ. 5,500 வரை சம்பளம் விகிதம் நிர்ணயம் செய்யப்பட்டது.
இதையடுத்து, பிற அரசு துறை ஓட்டுநர்களும், ஓய்வுபெற்ற ஓட்டுனர்களும் தங்களுக்கும் இந்த உத்தரவின்படி பணப் பலன்கள் வேண்டும் என்று வழக்கு தொடுத்தனர்.
அவர்களுக்கும் உயர் நீதிமன்ற உத்தரவுப்படி, தமிழக அரசு பலன்களை வழங்கி வந்தது. இதற்கிடையே அரசுத் துறை ஓட்டுநர்கள் சிலர் தொடுத்த வழக்கை விசாரித்த நீதிபதி டி.ஹரிபரந்தாமன், ஓட்டுநர்களுக்கு ரூ. 4,000 முதல் ரூ. 4,300 மட்டுமே ஊதிய விகிதம் இருக்க வேண்டும் என்று கூறி மனுக்களை தள்ளுபடி செய்தார். இந்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் பலர் மேல்முறையீடு செய்தனர்.
இந்த வழக்குகளை விசாரித்த நீதிபதிகள் வி.ராமசுப்பிரமணியன், டி.மதிவாணன் ஆகியோர் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவு:
கடந்த 2008-ஆம் ஆண்டு இதுபோன்ற வழக்கை விசாரித்த நீதிபதி, தவறுதலாக உத்தரவை பிறப்பித்துள்ளார். இதன் தொடர்ச்சியாக பலர் வழக்கு தொடுத்து ஊதிய பலன்களைப் பெற்றுள்ளனர். இதனால், அரசுக்கு பெரும் இழப்பு ஏற்பட்டுள்ளது.
முந்தைய நீதிபதி பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவில் உள்ள தவறைக் கண்டுபிடித்த நீதிபதி ஹரிபரந்தாமன், அதன் பின்னர் தொடுக்கப்பட்ட வழக்குகளைத் தள்ளுபடி செய்துள்ளார். இதில் எந்தத் தவறும் இல்லை.
தவறுதலாக ஓர் உத்தரவைப் பிறப்பித்து விட்டால், அதை ஏற்றுக் கொண்டு அந்தத் தவறைத் திருத்திக் கொள்ளும் துணிச்சல் நீதிமன்றத்துக்குத் தேவை என்று கூறி, மேல் முறையீட்டு மனுக்களைத் தள்ளுபடி செய்து உத்தரவிட்டனர்.

S’pore team likely to start training govt hospital staff from July-end

TRICHY: A refresher course for obstetrics and gynaecology staff, including doctors, by a team from Singapore International Foundation (SIF), SingHealth, and KK Women's and Children's Hospital in Singapore is likely to commence this month-end at the Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Government Hospital (MGMGH).

A two-member team from Singapore visited the hospital on Thursday as a precursor to the training programme. A source in the hospital said the team discussed with authorities on the date of commencement of the training programme and identify suitable place to conduct the programme inside the hospital premises. The training programme is expected to begin on July 27 or 28.

"A team of experts from Singapore may visit the hospital as part of the programme on providing technical expertise to the staff selected from various government health centres in the state," said an official requesting anonymity.

The experts attached to the project had visited the facilities related to the obstetrics and gynecology in MGMGH in September 2014 and April 2015. The purpose of the visit was to study the status of the maternal mortality rate (MMR) and infant mortality rate (IMR) in the state.

The six-month training programme is aimed at providing training to reduce maternal mortality rate (MMR) and infant mortality rate (IMR).

The programme also consists of onsite training in Singapore. "The decision on the onsite training may be taken after the first six months programme here," an official said.

However, director of medical education (DME) Dr S Geethalakshmi maintained that the decision on the training programme by a team from Singapore in the state was not taken yet.

"The Singapore medical team is carrying out the survey and they would submit the report to the government for the next decision. So, the decision on the launch of the programme has not been taken," DME told TOI.

Appearing for AIPMT? Don’t wear shoes!

NAGPUR: Candidates appearing for the All India Pre-Medical Test (AIPMT) on July 25 will have to pay as much attention to the dress code as they do to their academic preparation. The exam conducting body, CBSE, has banned shoes along with various other clothing and accessories inside examination hall fearing that it might aid in concealing electronic communication devices.

TOI had earlier reported about CBSE's plans to lay down strict security plans and a dress code for the exam after a hi-tech cheating scandal led to the Supreme Court ordering a retest.

Female candidates will have to leave even their basic ornaments like earrings, rings, bracelets, nose pin etc at home, else they won't be allowed to appear for the exam. Don't count on divine intervention either as lucky charms, pendants and tabeez are also barred from the hall. Shoes make way for open slippers as the central board needs to be sure that no communication device is hidden there. Only half sleeves T-shirt/kurta is allowed and that too ones with small buttons.

For the first time ever, the central board has written specifically to parents of candidates, urging them to ensure that their ward adheres to the strict guidelines and does not lose out on the chance to appear for the exam. The emotional appeal is aimed at providing an extra layer of security and putting onus on parents to ensure smooth conduct of AIPMT.

Clarifying on the need for a retest, the CBSE wrote to parents: "Board is aware that you have put in lots of efforts as well as spent your hard earned money in preparation of your ward for this examination. But because of dishonest intentions of a few persons, your efforts and money both have gone waste". It then appeals to parents to support CBSE and see that their ward complies with the instructions.

Sameer Phale, a medical exam trainer, said, "Re-conducting the exam was a wrong decision as students who study throughout the year suffer since their rhythm is broken. However, the strict guidelines will definitely discourage cheating to some level."

Exam details

Date |July 25 (Saturday)

Time | 10am to 1pm

Entry to centre closes | 9.30am

Physical frisking |Compulsory for all candidates


Dress code for exam

* Wear light clothes with half sleeves shirt / T-shirt / kurta not having big buttons, brooch or any badge, flower and trouser/salwar etc

* Don't wear shoes, only open slippers

* Earrings, rings, bracelets, nose pin, lucky charms, pendants and tabeez are also barred

After 7 yrs, HC admits to error in judgment

CHENNAI: In a rare but bold gesture, the Madras high court has admitted that it passed an incorrect order seven years ago that resulted in an avalanche of petitions, hundreds of incorrect subsequent rulings and loss of crores of rupees to the exchequer. " Greatness of the court lies only in its courage and ability to correct its mistakes. An illegality will not undergo a metamorphosis and become legal merely because it received the seal of approval of a court of law," the court said.

A division bench of Justice V Ramasubramanian and Justice T Mathivanan made the observation on Wednesday while rejecting the claim of a batch of government vehicle drivers who demanded a payscale of Rs 5,000-5,500 without any entitlement and legal right.

The association of government vehicle drivers had been fighting legal battles at several levels to correct perceived anomalies in their payscale since Fifth Pay Commission days. Even while one batch of cases was pending in the Supreme Court, a single judge of the Madras high court passed an innocuous - and legally untenable - order on September 30, 2008, directing the government to grant higher selection grade and special grade benefits to the drivers.

Though the order did not mention any specific payscale, it opened a floodgate of litigations, with even people who had retired long ago and those who had not questioned the issue for years together rushing to court demanding monetary benefits on the strength of the order. In the name of 'judicial discipline', subsequent judges started issuing specific rulings directing the government to fix Rs 5,000-5,500 as payscale for these drivers, without tracing the origin of the demand.

It was only after several thousand drivers, both in service and retired, had managed to extract their pound of flesh that the racket was noticed by Justice D Hariparanthaman, who traced the genesis of the problem and refused to pass orders favouring the drivers on November 18, 2013. All those " affected" by the order then queued up before the division bench headed by Justice Ramasubramanian demanding parity in treatment.

Narrating how the illegality unfolded over a period of seven years and how the government was bleeding under the threat of contempt and coercion, the bench of Justice Ramasubramanian and Justice Mathivanan said: " We have gone through the government orders many times, to find out what scale of pay the drivers are entitled to in selection and special grades. We are unable to find, however lenient our approach is, that the drivers could legitimately lay a claim selection grade scale of pay of Rs 5,000-8,000 and special grade scale of pay of Rs 5,500-9,000. Therefore, what they have claimed and got in most of the previous decisions of this court is not what they are lawfully entitled to."

Dismissing all the appeals of drivers, the bench made it clear that they were entitled to a selection grade scale of pay of Rs 4,000-100-6,000 and a special grade scale of pay of Rs 4,300-100-6,000, but not more than that.

Citing the Supreme Court, the bench said: " In rectifying an error, no personal inhibitions should debar the court, because no person should suffer by reason of any mistake of the court. The Supreme Court focused on the elementary rule of justice that no party should suffer due to the mistake of the court."