Friday, September 4, 2020

King cobra sighting at 2,400m sets new altitude record for the species

King cobra sighting at 2,400m sets new altitude record for the species

Prashant.Jha@timesgroup.com

Nainital:04.09.2020

Forest officials in Uttarakhand have for the first time recorded sightings of king cobra (Ophiophagus hannah) at heights of 2,200m to 2,400m in the Himalayas, a new altitude record for the species which has led to several experts calling for a detailed study on the how the world’s largest venomous snake was thriving at such elevations.

The observations, part of a report prepared by the Uttarakhand forest department’s research wing in Haldwani, a copy of which is with TOI, put the species’ habitat range as varying from 400m in Terai region to up to 2,400m in the hills. The report said that such a wide variation in habitat for a cold-blooded or ectothermic species was “unusual” and demands scientific investigation.

Reptiles are cold-blooded, meaning they depend on external heat sources for thermoregulation and generally prefer warmer climates. But during a ninemonth study, forest officials found nests of the snakeclassified as ‘vulnerable’ in the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) list— at heights of up to 2,400m in Mukteshwar (Nainital district) where winter temperatures are close to freezing and snowfall is common.

Chief conservator of forests (research) Sanjeev Chaturvedi, who led the study, said that the research involved field investigations as well as interviews with local residents. “This is the highest altitude at which a king cobra has ever been sighted,” Chaturvedi told TOI.

A study published in the journal Herpetology Notes in 2018 authored by Jignasu Dolia, a researcher at the Dehradun-based Wildlife Institute of India, had mentioned the highest recorded altitude for the king cobra—India’s national reptile— at 2,303m after a hatchling was found in the Indian Veterinary Research Institute’s (IVRI) campus in Mukteshwar in 2012. The species has been sighted at 1,840m in Sikkim, 1,170m in Mizoram and 1,830m in the Nilgiris.

(Inputs by Shivani Azad)
Universities can hold exams for 1st & 2nd year UG courses: SC

Dhananjay.Mahapatra@timesgroup.com

New Delhi:04.09.2020

Lakhs of students in first and second year undergraduate courses may have to appear for examinations this year to get promoted to the next year as the Supreme Court on Thursday said the University Grants Commission (UGC) has left it to the discretion of universities whether or not to conduct such exams.

Ayush Yesudas, a Delhibased 24-year undergraduate student of Indira Gandhi National Open University (Ignou), through counsel Manish Pratap Singh, argued before a bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan, R S Reddy and M R Shah that the July 22 notification of Ignou asking first and second year students to appear in examinations in December would not only keep them in confusion since many universities had decided to promote them to the next year without examination but also put them in grave danger because of the Covid-19 pandemic.

The bench said the UGC had left it to the discretion of universities to hold or not to hold examinations for first and second year undergraduate students. “It is for each university to decide. UGC has given discretion. If a university decides to hold an examination, it is not subject to judicial review. We cannot start deciding whether examination is necessary or not. It (Ignou’s decision) does not violate the UGC’s July 6 guidelines,” the bench said.

Each year, around 2.5 lakh students enrol for various undergraduate courses offered by Ignou. This means, around five lakh students will have to prepare for first and second year undergraduate examinations in December. The petition, filed through Pratik Bombarde, said most students who enrolled in undergraduate courses of Ignou came from poor backgrounds and would find it difficult to appear in online examinations.

The bench had recently upheld UGC’s July 6 guidelines making it mandatory for final year undergraduate and postgraduate students to appear in examinations to be entitled to their degrees. However, it softened the September 30 deadline set by UGC for completion of final examinations by ruling that states, under the Disaster Management Act, could defer final examinations given the Covid-19 situation.

Covid norms go for a toss on buses

Covid norms go for a toss on buses

Deepak Karthik & Sukshma R TNN

Trichy/Madurai:  04.09.2020

Twodays after intra-district bus services resumed, there has been significant improvement in patronagefrom passengers in Trichy and Madurai. However, buses that stop at borders of neighbouring districtswereovercrowded in Trichy despite inter-district services not resuming. Passengers have been taking the buses plying within the district to reach the border and then walking the remaining distance.

Though services resumed after two monthsfrom September 1,TNSTC had been blaming the poor patronage on absence of inter-district operations. However, the past two days saw more people, particularly women, taking buses to reach their workplace. In Trichy, Pettaivaithalai which shares borders with Karur and Thuvakudi that has a border with Thanjavur saw a surge in footfall. Besides locals travelling to reach Trichy city, inter-district travellers constitute a sizeable chunk.

In Madurai, buses connecting Melur and Thirumangalam witnessed overcrowding in peak hours. Between 8am and 10am, safety measures such as wearing face masks and social distancing had gone for a tosson these buses. “During peakhours, nobody maintains social distancing. Certain buses connecting Trichy city with Pettaivaithalai were overcrowded,” P Aiyarappan, a resident of Allur said. TNSTC officials in Trichy said the situation will improve once inter-district bus services resume. “Inter-district passengers are also a reason for overcrowding,” an official said.

In Coimbatore, the situation was not alarming. TNSTC officials said buses that were operated to places abutting the district borders had more passengers than city buses, but even in those vehicles masks were worn by most passengers. But, buses plying in Coimbatore had fewer passengers. Hesitation and fear to use public transportation as Covid-19 is peaking in the district were cited as the reasons for poor patronage for TNSTC buses in Coimbatore.

(With inputs from A Subburaj)

PATRONAGE POURS IN: A scene at Chathiram bus stand in Trichy on Thursday

S Rly to run 9 spl trains from city

S Rly to run 9 spl trains from city

Chennai: 04.09.2020

Southern Railways will operate nine special trains from Chennai to various cities in the state including Madurai, Coimbatore, Trichy and Tuticorin from September 7. Reservations for the trains will start at 8am on Sunday.

The trains include Chennai Egmore – Karaikkudi – Chennai Egmore Superfast Special (02605/02606) (daily), Chennai Egmore – Madurai – Chennai Egmore Superfast Special (02635/02636) (daily), Chennai Egmore – Madurai Chennai Egmore Superfast Special (02637/02638) (daily), Chennai Egmore – Tuticorin - Chennai Egmore Superfast Special (02693/02694) (daily), Chennai – Coimbatore – Chennai Superfast Intercity special (02675/02676), Coimbatore – Mayiladuthurai – Coimbatore Janshatabdi special (02084/ 02083) (except Tuesdays), Chennai – Coimbatore – Chennai Superfast Express special (02679/02680), Chennai – Coimbatore – Chennai Superfast Express special (02673/ 02674) and Chennai Egmore – Trichy – Chennai Egmore special (06795/06796) via Main line. TNN

Persons, Not Having Even Gone To Regular School/College, To Get Into Law College For First Time In Life : Madras HC Urges BCI To Amend Rules [Read Order]

Persons, Not Having Even Gone To Regular School/College, To Get Into Law College For First Time In Life : Madras HC Urges BCI To Amend Rules [Read Order]: The Madras High Court has urged the Bar Council of India to take a cue from its judgment and make necessary changes in Rule 5 of its Legal Education Rules to ensure that the candidates who

Persons, Not Having Even Gone To Regular School/College, To Get Into Law College For First Time In Life : Madras HC Urges BCI To Amend Rules

Persons, Not Having Even Gone To Regular School/College, To Get Into Law College For First Time In Life : Madras HC Urges BCI To Amend Rules [Read Order] 


3 Sep 2020 9:41 PM 

The Madras High Court has urged the Bar Council of India to take a cue from its judgment and make necessary changes in Rule 5 of its Legal Education Rules to ensure that the candidates who complete their Higher Secondary and UG through regular course alone are made eligible to participate for selection in the 5 year or 3 year LLB courses. 

"In the absence of the same, persons who have not even gone to the regular school or college will get into a law college for the first time in their life and that may not be a healthy trend to maintain the quality of education in Law", cautioned Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, stating that the Bar Council of India should seriously take this suggestion into consideration and make necessary changes to the Rule. 

The case of the petitioner before the Single Judge was that he had completed SSLC (10th) in the year 2010 and thereafter, he completed the Higher Secondary Course (+2) in the year 2014. The petitioner thereafter completed three years BCA Degree Course in the year 2017 through Distance Education mode from Tamil University, Thanjavur. The petitioner applied for the three year L.L.B. Degree Course under the MBC category and the petitioner has also obtained necessary 

cut off marks. At the time of counselling, the petitioner was informed that he was not eligible to be considered for selection for the 3 year L.L.B Course on the ground that the petitioner did not satisfy the requirements under Rule 5 of the 

Bar Council of India Rules. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition had been filed before the Court. Reliance was placed on the Full Bench Judgment of the Madras High Court, in the case of Mohammed Mustafa v. the Chairman, Tamil Nadu Dr.Ambedkar Law university and two others dated 13.03.2018, making it very clear that a person who has obtained the qualification even through distance/ correspondence education is eligible to be considered for admission to the 3 year course. 

Rule 5 reads as follows: 

Eligibility for admission.- (a) Three Year Law Degree Course: An applicant who has graduated in any discipline of knowledge from a University established by an Act of Parliament or by a State Legislature or an equivalent national institution recognised as a Deemed to be University or foreign University recognised as equivalent to the status of an Indian University by an authority competent to declare equivalence, may apply for a three years' degree programe in law leading to conferment of LL.B. Degree on successful completion of the regular program conducted by a University whose degree in law is recognised by the Bar Council of India for the purpose of enrolment. 

(b)Integrated Degree Programe: An applicant who has successfully completed Senior Secondary School course (+2) or equivalent (such as 11 + 1, 'A' level in Senior School Leaving certificate course) from a recognised University of India or outside or from a Senior Secondary Board or equivalent, constituted or recognised by the Union or by a State Government or from any equivalent institution from a foreign country recognised by the Government of that country for the purpose of issue of qualifying certificate on successful completion of the course, may apply for and be admitted into the program of the Centres of Legal Education to obtain the integrated degree in law with a degree in any other subject as the first degree from the University whose such a degree in law is recognised by the Bar Council of India for the purpose of enrolment. Provided that applicants who have obtained +2 Higher Secondary Pass Certificate or First Degree Certificate after prosecuting studies in distance or correspondence method shall also be considered as eligible for admission in the Integrated Five Years course or three years' LL.B. Course, as the case may be. 

Explanation.- The applicants who have obtained 10 +2 or graduation / post graduation through open Universities system directly without having any basic qualification for prosecuting such studies are not eligible for admission in the law courses. 

On a careful reading of Rule 5 of the Bar council of India Rules, it became clear to the Single bench that an applicant must graduate through a regular programme conducted by a University for the purpose of being considered for admission in the 3 year Law Course. "If the Rule had stopped there, obviously the petitioner will not be eligible since he has not completed the minimum education through regular course. However the proviso, which should be considered as an exception to the main Rule, expands the eligibility. The proviso makes it clear that even the applicants who have obtained Higher Secondary or Under Graduation through Distance Education will also be eligible for admission for the 5 year course or the 3 year course, as the case may be", noted the bench. 

The bench opined that the explanation clearly states that the applicant should not have obtained 10+2 or UG or PG through the Open University system directly without having any basic qualification. The bench explained it to mean that a person who has not completed 10th cannot qualify for 10+2, a person who has not completed 10+2 cannot qualify for UG and a person who has not completed UG cannot qualify for PG. "This is the literal meaning for the explanation appended to Rule 5 of Bar Council of India Rules. This Rule has been interpreted by the Full Bench in the judgement referred supra, and the Full Bench has made it very clear that a person who has obtained the qualification even through distance/correspondence education is eligible to be considered for admission to the 3 year course", said the bench. 

Noting the concern expressed by the counsel appearing for the respondent-law university to the effect that a candidate who has right through undergone education through distance education in 10th Standard, 10+2 and UG and who has never undergone regular course at any point of time, is knocking the doors of this Court claiming himself to be eligible for being considered for the 3 year Law Course, the bench, however, observed that the Rule viz., Rule 5 of the Bar Council of India Rules does not seem to match the concern so expressed. 

"The Rule itself provides for an exception to undergo education through distance/correspondence mode. Till this Rule is in force, a candidate who satisfies the requirements of this rule will have to be considered for admission to the course", stated the bench. 

The bench held that as per the existing Rules, the petitioner is eligible for being considered as a candidate for the 3 year B.L Course subject to the condition that the petitioner again participates in the selection for the academic year 2020-2021 and obtains necessary cut off marks. 

At the same time, the bench urged that the Bar Council of India can take a cue from this judgment and make necessary changes in Rule 5 to ensure that the candidates who complete their Higher Secondary and UG through regular course alone are made eligible to participate for selection in the 5 year course or 3 year course.

Thursday, September 3, 2020

"I have dealt with every case with my conscience", Justice Arun Mishra bids farewell to the Supreme Court


"I have dealt with every case with my conscience", Justice Arun Mishra bids farewell to the Supreme Court

"Analyse every Judgment and don't colour it this way or that way. If I have hurt anybody then please pardon me, pardon me, pardon me", the retiring judge said.



Chief Justice of India SA Bobde and senior members of the Bar bid farewell to Justice Arun Mishra, who retires as a judge of the Supreme Court today.

As per tradition, Justice Mishra shared the Bench with CJI Bobde on his last working day.

In a short farewell speech, Justice Mishra said that whatever he could do "came from the Supreme powers of this Court". He said,

"I always tried to borrow the weapon of power given to me by my learned brothers. All of you were the power behind whatever I have done."

Paying tribute to the Bar, he said,

"I have learnt so much from the members of the Bar. So many branches of law I have learnt from the Bar members. You can master the facts but there are so many local laws... And interpretation of those by lawyers."

Justice Arun Mishra

Justice Arun Mishra said that over the course of his career as a judge, he has "dealt with every case with his conscience."

"Sometimes I have been very harsh in my conduct directly or indirectly. Nobody should feel hurt. Analyse every Judgment and don't colour it this way or that way. If I have hurt anybody then please pardon me, pardon me, pardon me."

Justice Mishra

Referring to the Prashant Bhushan contempt case that he heard and decided, Justice Mishra stated,

"...even in the last case of contempt, AG said that he didn't want any punishment (for Prashant Bhushan) but.....".

CJI Bobde remarked that it was the very first time that he and Justice Mishra were sitting together, and would be the last time too. He said,

"It has been a privilege to have Justice Arun Mishra as a colleague. It is a peculiar thing that this is the first time I am sitting with him in Court and this happens to be his last time. You have been a beacon of courage and fortitude in discharging your duties."

CJI SA Bobde

Attorney General KK Venugopal, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, Supreme Court Bar Association President Dushyant Dave and Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association President Shivaji Jadhav were among the lawyers logged in to Court 1 to address Justice Mishra on his last day in office.

While AG Venugopal addressed Justice Mishra as the "iron judge of the Supreme Court," other law officers wished him well for his "second innings." The AG said,

"It is disappointing that this farewell is done through video conferencing. We are hoping he will be in Delhi, after all, he is only 65 years of age. I have had a good relationship with Justice Mishra for the last 30 years. He is the iron judge of the Supreme Court. We will miss him in Supreme Court and we wish him good health."

AG Venugopal

SC orders all-India audit of pvt & deemed universities Focus On Structural Opacity & Examining Role Of Regulatory Bodies

SC orders all-India audit of pvt & deemed universities Focus On Structural Opacity & Examining Role Of Regulatory Bodies   Manash.Go...