Monday, December 28, 2020

Colleges in a fix over five add-on seats


Colleges in a fix over five add-on seats

DU Yet To Issue Directions

Mohammad.Ibrar@timesgroup.com

New Delhi:28.12.2020

Following the controversial Delhi University notification of December 21regarding the addition of five new seats to courses this year, no new directions have been issued to colleges yet, even as admissions for 2020 end on December 31.

The notification signed by the registrar stated that college principals will be allowed to admit five students over and above the allotted number of seats, out of which the university may suggest two names. These five applicants would get 10% relaxation on the cutoff. This, DU claimed, was due to the Covid-19 pandemic and on the request of principals While most are waiting for directions, some colleges have forwarded the DU notice to their governing bodies, stating that principals do not have the right to take such decisions. Others have questioned the need for this notification at all.

A principal, on the condition of anonymity, dismissed the varsity’s claims. “Using Covid-19 as a crutch to conduct an activity similar to management quotas of private colleges is utterly shameful,” they said.

Principals say that most of them are unaware how the process will take place. “The university could have routed it through the Academic Council and the Executive Council, or at least from the admission committee,” said Manoj Khanna, principal of Ramjas College.

Suman Sharma, principal of Lady Shri Ram College said that no decision has been taken on this so far.

“We have no clarity on how to go about it as we have no directions,” said Kamala Nehru College principal Kalpana Bhakuni. “We also have to think about its implications.”

Principal Babri Moitra Saraf of IP College for Women said that the notification is unusual and is not supported by any ordinance or resolution. “I have forwarded it to my college GB for implementation as I don’t think the principal is empowered to select students for admission,” she said.

Saraf added that as she attended the last EC meeting in December as a member and there was no discussion on the topic. “We do not know which principals requested the notification,” she further said.

Speaking to TOI, DU’s dean of college Balram Pani was unsure of when directives would be issued. “The directions will go through the registrar. There was a meeting on the issue by the admission committee recently. We will get clarity by Monday.”

CITY CITY BANG BANG


CITY CITY BANG BANG

2020: The Year That Made Us All Think

SANTOSH DESAI

28.12.2020

Every year, the year-ender column is a bit of a ritual — it feels appropriate to look back and try and discern a pattern that defined the 12 months gone by. Sometimes the pattern really does exist, but on many occasions, it is a bit of a contrivance, this need to attribute meaning to a random period of time. This year, however, stands apart. For it is a year without parallel in recent history, and every individual on the planet has gone through an experience that was as constrictive as it was potentially transformative. 2020 seemed to have a plan for us all, and the emergence of a new variant just as we were getting hopeful about the vaccine makes it possible for us to ascribe to it a malevolence that is yet to play out fully.

This is a year that made us think. Wherever we came from, and whatever our station in life, we were forced to rethink so many ideas that we have taken for granted. It put us in a situation that we were not prepared for and had no physical and psychological equipment for. It was not a situation that could not have been foreseen, for there have been enough warnings, but the reality of going through this experience and that too collectively all across the world has been a deeply disorienting one.

Perhaps, the subject that was most unfamiliar given how hard we try and avoid it is that of death. For death and its prospect surrounded us. The most followed numbers in the year had to do with sickness and death. Daily new cases, daily deaths, the availability of ICU beds, the number of ventilators available. In the early days, Covid was something that happened to other people, but as the year wore on, it tightened its grip around us. People we knew were not only getting infected, but actually dying.

Death is always strange, for by definition we have no experience of it, and often sudden, but in Covid times, the randomness of death was even more striking than usual. The idea that being in a lift or in a shop or by clasping a door handle, one would bear such a dire consequence is a difficult idea to process; this mismatch between a truly trivial oversight and the heaviness of the price that needed to be paid.

The lottery aspect of the pandemic was underlined by the fact that some people who were infected showed no symptoms whatsoever. Most others got through without too much trouble. Only a few either perished or caught the longer-term version of the virus and struggled in the aftermath of their illness.

What made it worse was that people seemed to be dying not just of Covid, but in all sorts of ways. Young, old, healthy and those bursting with fitness all seemed susceptible. Whether it was a particularly aggressive form of cancer or massive heart attacks, the pages of social media seemed to fill up with terrible news. Statistically, it is unlikely that mortality rates went up last year, but it certainly seemed so. Perhaps, staying at home without the distraction of constant movement made us focus on the fragility of lives everywhere.

Time felt different last year. Time in pre-Covid times came neatly packed in little boxes. There was a rigidity about time, an inner insistence about its use that came pre-configured. Mornings meant getting ready, whether for school or work. The day was spent being and looking busy. Time wore appropriate clothes and followed prescribed behaviour. A uniform for school, formal attire for work, correctly informal clothes for work in a new-age workspace, relaxed chilling wear at home, celebratory attire that signaled fun for parties. Ditto for behaviour.

The last few months unglued time. Its structure fell apart, and its form became a shapeless blob. It went blank at the oddest time and overflowed its embankments frequently. We were in control now and a day later found ourselves overwhelmed. Life swirled all around us in the form of children’s wails and the incessant barking of dogs. Chores alternated with Zoom calls as life struggled to find a new rhythm. Thanks to the pandemic, we have experienced freedom from the structure of time as well as experienced its crushing weight.

Along with time came the question of priorities. If we spent most of this year stuck in a confined space, we also rediscovered the meaning of family ties in all their fullness. We were able to look at work from a whole new lens. Stripped of its accompanying paraphernalia, work took on a different colour. We could ask if this was the life we wanted to lead, and whether this was the place we needed to tie ourselves down to. A smaller town, perhaps, where commutes did not suck dry the ability and interest to do something more meaningful in life?

In some ways, this period was also a forced return to pre-liberalisation days where we made do with little. The experience of having to make do with what we had, particularly in the early days of the pandemic, underlined the fact that we consume more out of habit than out of need. Wardrobes felt bloated, cosmetic shelves looked ridiculously well-stocked, and cars and bikes sat by idly. If there was a loss, it was that of human contact. We missed being around people, interacting with those friends, making small talk with acquaintances and brushing shoulders with strangers in public spaces.

Will this experience make us re-evaluate how we lead our lives once we regain full control? Or will we slip back into familiar rhythms and comfortable habits because it is so easy to do so? Will we at least be more reflective versions of our old selves as we apply the wisdom that we have gained from this experience to new contexts? It all depends on whether 2021has a somewhat more optimistic script for us.

santosh365@gmail.com

My Times, My Voice: Like this article? SMS MTMVSAN <space> Yes or No to 58888

Is it time to resume offline coaching

Is it time to resume offline coaching

c-Jagriti.Kumari@timesgroup.com

28.12.2020

With exam season nearing, coaching institutes are waiting for the government approval to re-start offline classes. While most students are taking online lessons, final touches will be possible only if offline coaching is resumed to prepare them for Boards and entrance exams lined up from March. None of the states barring Bihar and UP has so far allowed the coaching institutes to resume offline classes. Just like any other sector, coaching institutes have faced major revenue losses since lockdown. While fee hike is ruled out, most institutes are hoping to get tax exemption as 18% GST is imposed on the fee.

“It is important for students to get into the grind which is possible only in offline mode. Excessive dependency on the digital medium has kept them away from peer competition and has also created psychological problems,” says Krishna Chaitanya Kasula, general secretary, Coaching Federation of India.

“It is not practical to increase the fee in 2021 as people are still grappling with financial problems and most students will opt out,” Kasula adds. Coaching institutes in Kota are waiting for the state government nod to start operating.

“Offline classes are more appropriate for preparation of competitive exams as it increases the interpersonal interaction and helps students in clearing their doubts which is restricted in digital mode,” says Naveen Maheswari, director, Allen Career Institute.

Full report on educationtimes.com

TALKING POINT


TALKING POINT

Should young doctors be compelled to serve government hospitals
UP govt has decided to fine students with Rs 1 crore if they do not serve government hospitals for 10 years after their post-graduation

28.12.2020

Devoting 10 years is a tough decision

Serving 10 years in an organisation means giving a major part of your career. Besides, allowing only those candidates who can serve this long in a government hospital or pay Rs 1 crore will drastically impact quality of doctors in the state.

MONIKA SHEKHAWAT

GENERAL SURGERY RESIDENT, THIRD YEAR, PGI ROHTAK

Government invests huge amount

The government invests a huge amount and resources in state medical colleges. The students who get a seat in these colleges avail the best medical education in extremely marginal fees. After getting their degrees most of these doctors join private hospitals. This consequently creates a shortage of doctors in rural areas and government hospitals.

ABHISHEK PANDEY

MBBS, THIRD YEAR, KD MEDICAL COLLEGE, HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE, MATHURA

Must reduce the duration

While, the move will give us more exposure to patients, giving 10 years to a hospital is long. A student can complete an MD/MS during this period. They can study to get a fellowship from prestigious universities. The decision to work in a government hospital is worth appreciating but it would have been better if doctors were asked to work for a relatively lesser duration such as 2-3 years.

PIYUSH MISHRA

MBBS STUDENT, GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE, BANDA

Should improve infrastructure

This step is taken keeping in view the shortage of doctors in government medical hospitals. The decision will help in improving the condition of state hospitals. People living in rural areas who are deprived of the required medical attention will benefit from the move. However, the government needs to work on improving the status of the government hospitals rather than such forceful compulsion.

UTKARSH SINGH

MBBS, THIRD YEAR, GS MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL, HAPUR

–As told to

Puniti Pandey

Universities to roll back fee refund policy post COVID


Universities to roll back fee refund policy post COVID

c-Puniti.Pandey@timesgroup.com

28.12.2020

UGC has come for the rescue of parents battling financial crisis due to lockdown and has instructed educational institutes to refund fees of students who withdraw their admission from the first-year undergraduate, postgraduate courses for the academic session 2020-21. Akhil Shahani, director, Thadomal Shahani Centre For Management observes that the move is introduced only during the pandemic and the decision will be rolled back once the situation normalises.

“Several universities in India have a policy of not refunding admission charges of students even if they drop out before the course starts. They make a huge amount of revenue from this. The UGC directive of refunding all fees is only for the year 2020-21 due to the hardships created by COVID, it will hit the revenues of universities as their expenses remain the same. It is unlikely that universities will change their refund policies post COVID,” he says.

The UGC directive is a special case for 2020-21, he adds. Once the situation returns to normal, the universities will go back to their old policies of non-refundable admission fees. The revenue from this is too large to give up easily.

The fee refund policy by UGC is already being followed at JK Lakshmipat University. Apart from the Rs 1,000 bank processing charges, the university refunds the entire admission amount.

“We have clearly mentioned the fee refund policy in the joining letter for respective courses. We just deducting the bank processing charges from the fees,” says KK Maheshwari, officiating registrar, JK Lakshmipat University, Jaipur.

Oxford vax may get nod in a few days


Oxford vax may get nod in a few days

‘SII Data OK, Govt May Not Wait For Approval In UK’

New Delhi:

India is likely to see the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine approved for emergency use in the next few days as the updated data submitted by Serum Institute of India appears “satisfactory”, top government sources said, reports Sushmi Dey. Once evaluation of data is done, the regulator may not wait for the vaccine’s approval from UK’s regulatory agency, MHRA.

Daily cases now 1/4th of Sept peak

Three months after Covid cases peaked on September 17, the average number of new cases has fallen by threefourth. Positivity rate is rising only in Kerala. P 6

‘3 vaccines likely to get emergency use authorization’

We can take our regulatory decisions independently. The company has submitted the same data here from clinical trials in the UK and Brazil and rolling reviews are going on. The updated information shared by Serum Institute also appears satisfactory. We are hopeful that based on regulatory assessment, the vaccine will be approved in a day or two,” a senior official told TOI.

However, it is quite possible that the UK may also meanwhile grant the emergency use authorisation as MHRA is already reviewing the data for the vaccine developed by Oxford University and pharma major AstraZeneca.

A PTI report said the drug major's CEO Pascal Soriot has reported the Covishield vaccine to have achieved a “winning formula” for efficacy. Soriot’s comments were carried in an interview with the Sunday Times newspaper. He added that he believes trials will show his firm has achieved a vaccine efficacy equal to Pfizer-BioNTech at 95% and Moderna at 94.5 per cent.

“We think we have figured out the winning formula and how to get efficacy that, after two doses, is up there with everybody else,” the chief executive said, while only adding that data would be published at “some point”. He also said that the vaccine “should be” effective against the new highly transmissible variant of the coronavirus.

The government plans to inoculate around 30 crore “priority” population in the first phase of the vaccination drive that is expected to roll out in the first week of January and end latest by July. This will include healthcare and frontline workers and those at higher risk of infection such as people over 50 years of age and others below 50 years but with severe co-morbidities that can lower immunity and increase chances of death due to Covid-19 infection.

“In the coming weeks we are likely to have around three vaccines with emergency use authorization, paving way for a large scale vaccine roll out,” the official said.

He added, once the availability of vaccine increases, the second phase will be rolled out simultaneously to expand the vaccine coverage.

Apart from Covishield – for which Pune based SII is a major manufacturing partner of AstraZeneca – two other vaccine candidates have sought emergency use authorisation in India. These are Pfizer and the locally developed Covaxin by Hyderabadbased Bharat Biotech.

Covishield has shown 62% efficacy when two full doses were given to trial participants, but 90% for a smaller subgroup given a half, then a full dose. In India, the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) is likely to approve the vaccine only in two full doses as the clinical trial protocol approved here as well as the bridging studies being conducted in the country involves only full doses.

The government also plans to conduct dry run on December 28 and 29 in four states to assess the readiness.

DATA AWAITED

›Case fatality rate among seniors in K’taka dips, P 4 ›Europe’s vaccination drive in full swing, P 13

Don’t fly in Chinese nationals, Centre informally tells airlines


Don’t fly in Chinese nationals, Centre informally tells airlines

Move Follows Beijing ‘Ban’ On Indian Flyers

Saurabh.Sinha@timesgroup.com

New Delhi:28.12.2020

In a strong retaliatory push, India has asked all airlines informally not to fly Chinese nationals into the country. This comes after China’s not-so-subtle move to stop Indians from flying into their country, something that has only tightened since November.

While flights between India and China are currently suspended, Chinese nationals eligible to travel as per current norms for foreigners have been doing so by first flying to a third country with which India has a travel bubble. And from there, they fly to India. In addition, Chinese nationals living in air bubble countries have also been flying to India from there for work and business.

Over the past weekend, airlines — both Indian and foreign — have been specifically asked not to fly Chinese nationals to India. At the moment tourist visas to India remain suspended but foreigners are allowed to travel here on work and some other categories of non-tourist visas. Industry sources say a majority of Chinese nationals flying to India have been coming from air bubble countries in Europe.

Some airlines, it is learned, asked the authorities to give them something in writing so that they can give reason for denying boarding to Chinese nationals booked on flights to India as per current norms.

New Delhi’s response comes when Indian seafarers are stranded in various Chinese ports because China is refusing to allow them on shore, or even to change crew. This has affected almost 1,500 Indians serving on international flag merchant vessels as they can’t even come back home.

Indian seafarers have taken collateral hit

Though the target is Australia, whose coal is now banned by China, Indian seafarers have taken a big collateral hit and Beijing does not seem to be willing to organise immediate relief. Questioned this week, the Chinese foreign ministry lobbed the ball back in the courts of local authorities.

But officials say there are no permissions forthcoming from any local authority. The Chinese government has given a list of steps to be followed, but, Indian officials say, they are designed to frustrate efforts.

In early November, China had suspended the entry of foreign nationals holding valid Chinese visas or residence permits from some countries including India due to the pandemic. "The Chinese embassy/consulates in India will not stamp the health declaration forms for the holders of the above-mentioned categories of visa or residence permits," the Chinese embassy in India had said in a statement on its website on November 5, while exempting some categories of visa holders like diplomats.

“The entry into China with visas issued after November 3, 2020 is not affected… suspension is a temporary measurement that China has to adopt to deal with the current pandemic. China will make further adjustment and announcement in accordance with the ongoing pandemic situation in a timely manner,” the statement had said. China’s decision had come after almost 20 passengers of an Air India Vande Bharat Mission Delhi-Wuhan flight of October 30 had tested Covid positive and another 40 were found to have Covid antibodies on arrival.

China’s special administrative region of Hong Kong suspends airlines for 14 days if five or more passengers on any single flight test positive on arrival. Hong Kong has so far barred AI four times and Vistara once during the pandemic for this reason.

NEWS TODAY 29.01.2026