Apex court issues notice on PIL questioning NAAC functioning

Apex court issues notice on PIL questioning NAAC functioning 

‘Working Is Marred By Corruption And Lack Of Transparency’

AmitAnand.Choudhary@timesofindia.com 10.04.2025

New Delhi : Supreme Court on Wednesday decided to go deep into the functioning of National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) which assesses and grades the higher education institutions in the country after it was alleged that its working is marred by corruption and lack of transparency and arbitrariness which is also reflected in CAG audit report and a case registered by CBI against its officials . 

Sensing that the allegations levelled in PIL was very serious which could affect higher education in the country, a bench of Justices P S Narasimha and Joyamalya Bagchi said that it would examine the petition questioning the functioning of the council. 

Pleading for the court’s intervention, advocate Mohammad Shoeb Alam and advocate Manan Verma told the bench that the issue was very serious as the very credibility and fairness of the council’s working was questionable. 

The petition filed by NGO ‘Nostro Destino Foundation’, which works with Tihar jail prisoners to impart them education and help them in rehabilitation, requested the court to set up a committee to scrutinise and check assessments and gradings done by the Council of Higher Education Institutions in the last 5 years. 

Agreeing to hear the plea, the bench said “We want to go deep into the matter as to how they are functioning.” The petitioner submitted that the CAG audit done in March 2023 revealed glaring discrepancies in NAAC’s assessment processes and CBI recently in Feb registered a case against NAAC officials and certain educational institutions for accepting bribes in exchange for favorable accreditation scores.

The bribes reportedly included cash payments, gold, mobile phones and laptops highlighting the transactional nature of the accreditation process, it said. “After the allegations of corruption surfaced in the grading process in February, 2025, NAAC removed over 900 assessors without conducting re-assessments of the institutions evaluated by them. 

Further, NAAC arbitrarily initiated a re-DVV process (data validation and verification) after the first process ended for several insti tutions, reducing their previously awarded scores without affording any opportunity of hearing them. The 

 absence of transparency in the NAAC assessment process has led to widespread uncertainty regarding its credibility and fairness,” the petition said. The bench, after a brief hearing, issued notice to UGC, NAAC and Centre’s HRD ministry and sought their response. The petition said the assessment and grading done by NAAC not only affects the reputation of the institutions but also affects the quality of education being provided and the process followed by NAAC is violative of Article 14 and Article 21 of Constitution. It said arbitrary and non-uniform grading processes lead to discrimination among HEIs, as some institutions benefit from corrupt practices while others suffer due to a lack of transparency. “The opaque process of peer team selection and institutional assessments has led to inconsistent and unreliable grading,” the petition said. UNDER SCANNER: We want to go deep into the matter as to how they are functioning, said the SC agreeing to the plea