Tuesday, May 7, 2024
Monday, May 6, 2024
Date Of Birth Recorded In HSC Pass Certificate Is To Be Taken As The Date Of Birth For All Purposes: Orissa High Court
Date Of Birth Recorded In HSC Pass Certificate Is To Be Taken As The Date Of Birth For All Purposes: Orissa High Court
5 May 2024 3:13 PM
A single bench of the Orissa High Court comprising of Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy while deciding a Writ Petition in the case of Madan Raul vs State of Orissa & Ors has held that date of birth recorded in the HSC Pass Certificate is to be taken as the Date of birth for all purposes.
Background Facts
Madan Raul (Petitioner) entered into service in 1968 as a Peon. His date of birth was recorded as 12.07.1948 in the service book opened after this appointment. The Petitioner had not passed his HSC Pass Examination conducted by the Board of Secondary Education, Odisha (Board) when he was appointed as a Peon. However, he cleared this examination in August 1970 and in the HSC Certificate issued by the Board, the date of birth of the Petitioner was recorded as 12.07.1950. Further the date of birth of the Petitioner in the Transfer Certificate was also mentioned as 12.07.1950.
Based on the HSC certificate and Transfer Certificate, the Petitioner was appointed as a Diarist-cum-Typist in 1973 and in the subsequent service book opened after his new appointment, his date of birth was recorded as 12.07.1950. Based on his date of birth to be 12.07.1950, the Petitioner was supposed to retire on 31.07.2008 but the Respondent passed an order of retirement of the dated 17.08.2006 by which the Petitioner was made to retire from service on 31.07.2006 considering his date of birth to be 12.07.1948.
The Petitioner challenged the retirement order before the Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal). However, the Tribunal was subsequently abolished and the matter was transferred to the High Court.
It was contended by the Petitioner that his date of birth recorded in his service book after joining as Diarist-cum-Typist was not objected to by anyone and was never corrected by following the due process of law. Further, since the date of birth in the 1973 service book was recorded after taking into account the HSC Pass certificate of the Petitioner, the Petitioner could not be made to retire in 2006.
On the other hand, it was contended by the Respondent that since the date of birth of the Petitioner while joining as a Peon was recorded as 12.07.1948, he was made to retire on attaining the age of 58 years, which fell due on 31.07.2006. Thus, no illegality had been committed by the Respondent.
Findings of the Court
The court observed that in both the HSC Certificate and the Transfer Certificate, the date of birth of the Petitioner was recorded as 12.07.1950. The said date of birth was also recorded in service book of the Petitioner opened after he joined as Diarist-Cum-Typist. The court further held that:
This Court is of the view that date of birth recorded in the HSC Pass Certificate is to be taken as the Date of birth for all purposes.
The court thus held that 12.07.1950 should be taken as the date of birth of the Petitioner and the Petitioner should have retired on 31.07.2008 instead of 31.07.2006. However, since the Petitioner had not discharged any duty for the period 01.08.2006 to 31.07.2008, he was not be entitled to get any salary for the said period. However, the court ordered the pay of the petitioner be notionally fixed and further ordered revision of pensionary benefits.
With the aforesaid observations, the court allowed the writ petition and quashed the order of retirement
Case No.- WPC (OAS ) NO.50 of 2018
Case Name- Madan Raul vs State of Orissa & Ors
Counsel for the Petitioner- Mr. L. Sahu, Adv.
Counsel for Respondents- nil
College of Pharmacy at MMC in Chennai staring at losing approval due to lack of qualified teachers
College of Pharmacy at MMC in Chennai staring at losing approval due to lack of qualified teachers
Peethaambaran Kunnathoor, Chennai
Thursday, April 11, 2024, 08:00 Hrs [IST]
Peethaambaran Kunnathoor, Chennai
Thursday, April 11, 2024, 08:00 Hrs [IST]
The College of Pharmacy at the Madras Medical College (MMC), the oldest pharmacy institution that started a diploma course in pharmaceutical sciences in the country 55 years ago, is now facing the threat of losing its approval or at least face penal actions like cutting short of student intake due to non-compliance of the Pharmacy Council of India (PCI) norms and the TN Dr MGR Medical University rules, it is learnt.
In a recent letter sent to the director of medical education (DME) through the dean of the MMC by the principal of the pharmacy college, it was informed to the director that the oldest pharmacy institution under the state government is suffering and struggling to provide quality education to the graduate and post graduate students. Apart from the B Pharm batches, the college runs four specializations in the post graduate level (M Pharm). All these classes are handled and managed by 17 teachers.
For the academic year 2024-25, the inspections by PCI and by the university are due; mostly it will be done after the general elections. What is now most distressing is that several of the teachers are not qualified as per the education regulation rules of the PCI, and the existing recruitment rule was made 55 years ago.
According to sources from the academic community, PCI has mandated that the basic qualification required for a faculty member for teaching degree class is first class B Pharm degree, and for post graduate course, the teacher must have passed M Pharm degree with first class. Sources have alleged that, in olden times, when there was shortage of qualified teachers, pharmacists working in the government hospitals with B Pharm qualifications were deputed to the college to teach the degree classes, and later on they got regularized as faculty members for the degree course. Many of these teachers do not possess first class degrees or first class M Pharm degrees, however they continue as professors on the advantage of experience. This shows that the College of Pharmacy at the Government Madras Medical College in Chennai is not following the rules and regulations mandated by the PCI and also by the TN Dr MGR Medical University.
Secondly, the college has no regular principal and the charge is given to a professor of a department. This phenomenon has been happening for the last several decades. It is alleged that the government is unwilling to create a post of principal for administrative purposes and to look after examination research, regulation and other academic related activities. The faculties want the government to create the post of principal at the earliest and it has to be a promotional prost from the professor cadre.
Thirdly, the teaching faculties are worrying mostly for not creating promotional cadres. Even the most qualified and experienced teachers are also working in the cadre of Assistant or Association professors.
In addition to all these, the grave problem that affects the very existence of the institution is the lack of adequate teachers. The government is neither appointing the sufficient staff including professors in all the departments to fulfill the sanctioned strength nor creating any additional post. Filling up of the vacant post of professors and associate professors is critical for approval and affiliation by regulatory bodies like PCI and the Tamil Nadu Dr.MGR Medical University. The present strength of faculties was fixed 55 years ago and that still continues without any amendment.
In anonymity a faculty member of the college told Pharmabiz that soon after the election is over, the inspections by the PCI and the University will take place. Currently, the college is facing insufficient number of teaching faculties as per the norms of the PCI. The reason he cites for the staff crunch including administrative staff is the apathy of the government. He said, despite repeated requests by the academic community and the alumni associations, the authorities are keeping mum on the issue, and that too for the last half a century.
The post of professor is vacant in the departments of pharmaceutics and in pharmacology for more than five years, whereas six posts of associate professors are vacant for more than nine years. Today the college has only 17 teaching faculties both for B Pharm and for M Pharm (4 specializations). As per the PCI rules, for B Pharm course alone, 19 teachers are required and for M Pharm 16 faculties are needed. The college’s sanctioned strength of teaching faculties is only 27, out of which 10 is lacking. As per the regulators’ norms, nine more posts need to be created.
Meanwhile, Pharmabiz has tried to take the response of the DME, but his office has informed that since the officers have to adhere to the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) for the general elections he is unable to comment on the issue.
Meanwhile, Additional Chief Secretary, Gagandeep Singh Bedi, who is holding the charge of Principal Secretary for Health, said that the government will positively consider the issues and try to resolve them after the election is over. He said the officers like DME are barred from commenting on issues related to the government because of the election.
Friday, May 3, 2024
NMC task force launches online survey to assess mental health of medical students, faculty
NMC task force launches online survey to assess mental health of medical students, faculty
Disability researcher Dr Satendra Singh questioned on the lack of diversity in representation in the NMC's National task force on mental health.
By Chetana Belagere
Published May 02, 2024 | 7:00 AM ⚊Updated May 02, 2024 | 7:00 AM
NMC has sought for reports from all medical colleges on the number of medicos who have died by suicide.
Concerned over the deteriorating mental health of medicos, the National Medical Commission (NMC) has launched a nationwide survey on the mental health of medical students.
The online survey aims to tackle increasing instances of depression, ragging, and suicides. The survey questionnaire, a Google form, is widely shared on several online platforms in all colleges.
The survey is part of the NMC’s exercise to uncover stress factors, issues the students fear the most, and how their workload affects them.
Why the survey?
The NMC issued a public notice a week ago, directing all Indian medical colleges to furnish the form by Friday, 3 May.
“Anti-ragging cell in NMC has constituted a National Task Force on mental and well-being of the medical students. The task force has decided to conduct an online survey of medical students as well as the faculty in medical colleges,” the notice by Aujender Singh, Deputy Secretary of the Post-Graduate Medical Education Board (PGMEB) and Member Secretary of the national task force, said.
The NMC has promised to keep the participants’ identities confidential. The notice also stated that the task force will use the responses only for analysis and recommendation in its report.
“Individual responses will not be shared publicly,” the notice stated.
Interestingly, the notice also had a disclaimer, saying the data would not be 100 percent secure.
“We have taken appropriate measures to ensure the security of the data collected in this survey. However, please be aware that no method of transmission over the internet or electronic stores is 100 percent sure,” it said.
Depression and suicides
According to reports, 122 medical students — 64 MBBS and 58 post-graduates — have died of suicide over the past five years. Mental health and suicides have been a concern for the entire medical community.
Medical associations lauded the survey. “This is a much-needed initiative to address the burning issue of mental health amongst medical graduates and postgraduates,” the Federation of Resident Doctors’ Association (FORDA) posted on X.
“Wheels are turning, we will fight and defeat this demon of mental stress together!” it added.
“It is a much stronger move by NMC to address the mental issues of the medical students and faculty. We appreciate the move,” National Secretary of the FAIMA Doctors Association Dr Rishiraj Sinha said on the social media platform.
Even as many appreciated the NMC initiative, Dr Satendra Singh, Director-Professor at the University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi, and a prominent disability researcher, questioned the lack of diversity in representation in the Commission’s National Task Force.
Speaking to South First, Dr Singh said a research paper published in Dialogues in Health raised a crucial question in January: Who drives the health policy agenda in India?
The study’s conclusion was alarming: Indian health committees from 1943 to 2020 lacked diversity in representation from multiple perspectives, failing to involve the real stakeholders.
Dr Singh had filed applications under the Right to Information (RTI) Act seeking details of the representation of stakeholders in the task force responsible for formulating India’s National Suicide Prevention Strategy.
The task force lacked representation from suicide-attempt survivors, individuals living with mental health conditions, and suicide loss survivors — key stakeholders whose voices should have been heard in framing national guidelines.
“Unfortunately, this oversight has been repeated by the anti-ragging committee of the National Medical Commission, which recently announced a 15-member National Task Force to address suicide concerns among medical students,” Dr Singh explained.
He raised a critical question. “Where are the voices of suicide survivors or those with psychological disabilities in these decision-making processes?”
Another study published in JAMA — American Medical Association’s peer-reviewed journal — found that Asian and Underrepresented Medicine students with multiple disability types faced the highest risk of burnout, with over a three-fold greater risk compared to their white peers without disabilities.
Access to accommodations has been shown to mitigate burnout among students with disabilities. However, unlike the General Medical Council in the UK (Welcomed and Valued), the NMC lacked a clear pathway for requesting accommodations. It indicated a gap in addressing the needs of medical students with mental health conditions.
Dr Singh highlighted a disconnect between the University Grants Commission (UGC)’s accessibility guidelines, Ministry of Education’s Wellness Committees in all colleges, UGC’s Enabling Units and the NMC UG PG guidelines not mentioning reasonable adjustments.
He said that when the forms are analysed and the task force is debating on the recommendations they should have ideally included voices of suicide survivors and those with psychological disabilities.
(Edited by Majnu Babu).
Wednesday, May 1, 2024
Cash Limit at Home: Income Tax Department can take action if you keep more cash at home than this
Cash Limit at Home: Income Tax Department can take action if you keep more cash at home than this
April 30, 2024
Cash Limit at Home: Income Tax Department can take action if you keep more cash at home than this
Cash Limit at Home: To control problems like tax evasion and black money, the government has made many rules regarding cash. You must know about these rules.
Cash Limit at Home: Digital transactions have increased rapidly since the Corona period. Now a large population prefers to do online transactions. But even after this, all types of transactions are still done through cash. At the same time, people who are not internet friendly also prefer to complete all their work through cash instead of online transactions.
Because of this, people still keep a lot of cash at home. But to control problems like tax evasion and black money, the government has made many rules regarding cash. In such a situation, there is a question which comes to mind many times, but we do not discuss it and that is how much cash can you keep at home? Know about it here-
What are the rules for keeping cash?
According to Income Tax rules, no special rule or limit has been made in the matter of keeping cash at home. If you are financially capable then you can keep any amount of cash at home. But you must have a source for that amount. If ever you are interrogated by the investigating agency, you will have to show the source. Besides, ITR declaration will also have to be shown. This means that if you have not earned money by wrong means, then no matter how much cash you keep at home, you do not need to worry.
Action can be taken in these situations
If you are not able to tell the investigating agency the source of the money, then it can be a big problem for you. In such a situation, the investigating agency is informed about this matter. Then the Income Tax Department checks how much tax you have paid. Meanwhile, if undisclosed cash is found in the calculations, then action can be taken against you by the Income Tax Department. In such a situation, tax up to 137% of the undisclosed amount can be charged from you.
What are the other rules regarding cash?
According to the Central Board of Direct Taxes, if you withdraw more than Rs 50 thousand cash at a time, you will have to show your PAN card. Under Section 194N of the Income Tax Act, if a person withdraws more than Rs 20 lakh in a financial year, he will have to pay TDS. However, this rule is only for those people who have not filed Income Tax Return (ITR) for 3 consecutive years.
– People who have filed ITR get some relief in this matter. Such people can withdraw cash up to Rs 1 crore in a financial year from bank, post office or co-operative bank account without paying TDS. In this situation, if you withdraw more than Rs 1 crore cash from the bank in a year, you will have to pay 2% TDS. If you have not filed ITR for the last three years, then you will have to pay 2% TDS on transactions of Rs 20 lakh and 5% on transactions of more than Rs 1 crore.
– Transactions above Rs 1 lakh at a time through credit-debit cards may be subject to scrutiny. Apart from this, you cannot pay more than Rs 2 lakh in cash to buy anything. If you want to do this, you will have to show PAN and Aadhaar here also.
Campus Talk: 4 days to go for NEET, but dress code panic grips candidates, parents
Campus Talk: 4 days to go for NEET, but dress code panic grips candidates, parents
Parents say the chaos at some exam centres is due to lack of training for the staff on-ground regarding the dress code and other dos and don’ts to be followed for the NEET-UG.
Written by Pallavi Smart
Mumbai | Updated: April 30, 2024 17:03 IST
With only four days left for the single largest national level entrance test, panic levels among candidates and their parents are at their peak. (PTI/ File photo)
Candidates appearing for National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) – Under Graduate (UG) for admission to medical courses are not allowed to take anything inside the exam hall, except their admit card, according to guidelines. The NEET exam follows a strict dress-code and students are subject to extensive and compulsory frisking at the entrance.
The all-India pre-medical test for those who wish to pursue undergraduate medical or dental courses will be held on May 5, Sunday. With only four days left for the single largest national level entrance test, panic levels among candidates and their parents are at their peak.
But all the stress is not about studies alone. In fact, there are more worries about the dress code and other dos and don’ts to follow for the NEET-UG, thanks to multiple reports on chaos outside NEET exam centres in the past.
The National Testing Agency (NTA) information booklet on NEET has dedicated pages to these instructions. However, according to parents, reports of instances from outside NEET exam centres contribute to their stress, for example, last year, one exam centre in Tamil Nadu allegedly asked girls to remove bras for having metal as metallic objects are not allowed inside the exam.
“Now who would have thought metal on bras will be considered a metallic object,” said Sudha Shenoy, a parent and an expert in guiding medical aspirants on technical matters of NEET and is currently addressing multiple questions from candidates and parents on the same topic. “They are worried as any smallest mistake can lead to last minute panic.”
Shenoy shared how candidates and parents are asking questions like “Is it okay to have brand-name on footwear?” “Is it allowed to wear palazzo-pants?” among all.
Blaming the chaos on the lack of training for the staff on-ground, Shenoy said, “The information booklet on NEET does provide details on the instructions. But its implementation does not seem to be universal due to lack of proper training to the staff. This confusion causes chaos at some centres, which makes it to the news and thus result in general panic among candidates and parents, who are new every-year.”
Tamil Nadu: Court convicts Nirmala Devi in Madurai Kamaraj university sex racket case
Tamil Nadu: Court convicts Nirmala Devi in Madurai Kamaraj university sex racket case
After the case became linked to the office of then Governor Banwarilal Purohit, Raj Bhavan refuted allegations of his involvement.
Nirmala Devi, the prime accused in the Madurai Kamaraj University (MKU) sex racket case Photo| K K Sundar
Updated on:
30 Apr 2024, 7:23 am
VIRUDHUNAGAR: The Fast Track Mahila Court in Srivilliputhur on Monday convicted Nirmala Devi, the prime accused in the 2018 case involving a bid to lure female college students into giving sexual favours to Madurai Kamaraj university officials in exchange for marks and financial support.
The high-profile case came to light after an audio clip purportedly of the former Devanga Arts college assistant professor attempting to lure the female students was circulated online. After the case became linked to the office of then Governor Banwarilal Purohit, Raj Bhavan refuted allegations of his involvement.
While Nirmala Devi was convicted, the court acquitted the other two accused, former MKU assistant professor V Murugan and former MKU research scholar S Karuppasamy. Judge T Bagavathi Ammal said the quantum of punishment will be pronounced on Tuesday (April 30). According to sources, she was convicted under five sections, including sections of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act.
Nirmala Devi, who was teaching at Devanga Arts college in Aruppukottai, was arrested by Aruppukottai Town police on April 16, 2018 under Sections 370 and 511 of the IPC and 67 of the IT Act following a complaint from the college’s secretary Ramasamy, stating that four female students had complained to him that Nirmala tried to engage them to provide sexual favors to MKU officials in return for marks and financial support.
The case was transferred to CB-CID within days and Sections of 9 of Immoral Traffic Act and 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act were also included. During the investigation, Murugan and Karuppasamy were also alleged to be involved in the crime and were arrested.
TN to appeal against acquittal of two accused
Governor Purohit, who addressed a press conference to refute the allegations against him, also set up a one-man committee led by retired IAS officer R Santhanam to probe the matter and file a report to him.
Trial in the Fast Track Mahila court began in 2018.
On Friday, the court adjourned the judgment to Monday as Nirmala wasn’t present due to health issues. After the judge pronounced the verdict on Monday, Nirmala was arrested and remanded in Madurai Central Prison. Addressing reporters, the special public prosecutor M Chandrasekaran said the state would appeal against the acquittal of Murugan and Karuppasamy. He added that witnesses from MKU had turned hostile.
One-man panel
Former governor Banwarilal Purohit also set up a one-man committee to probe the matter and file a report to him
Madurai Kamaraj varsity V-C to resign over ‘health issues’
Madurai Kamaraj varsity V-C to resign over ‘health issues’
According to sources, MKU has been facing a financial crisis for over four years. Every month, officials face challenges in obtaining funds from the higher education department.
Updated on:
30 Apr 2024, 8:08 am
MADURAI: Madurai Kamaraj University (MKU) Vice-chancellor J Kumar is set to resign, citing health issues. Kumar assumed office on April 1, 2022, and his tenure is for a period of three years. Even though he has 11 months before his tenure ends, Kumar reportedly wishes to retire before.
According to sources, MKU has been facing a financial crisis for over four years. Every month, officials face challenges in obtaining funds from the higher education department. Over 6,000 audit objections prevented the university from getting grants from the state government, accumulated over 15 years during the former VC’s tenure. The higher education department has also imposed conditions, including restructuring salaries, reassigning administrative designations in accordance with the ministerial staff and cancelling inappropriate appointments, among others.
Even though Kumar tried to implement the conditions, the administrative staff approached the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court and got an interim stay. The court later ordered not to restructure the salaries or reassign the designations. Since the higher education department did not disburse funds to release the salaries as per the court orders, Kumar has decided to resign, sources said.
Speaking to TNIE, Kumar said that plans to submit a resignation letter within two weeks, citing his health condition. “There is no rule to submit my resignation. However, I have to discharge my responsibilities to the convener committee,” he said.
Tuesday, April 30, 2024
Employee Appointed Through Valid Process Can't Be Denied Regularization If Performing Permanent Role For Considerable Time: Supreme Court
Employee Appointed Through Valid Process Can't Be Denied Regularization If Performing Permanent Role For Considerable Time: Supreme Court
26 Apr 2024 9:17 PM
The Court distinguished the 'Umadevi' case dictum by noting that it has differentiated between "illegal" and "irregular" appointments.
Listen to this Article
The Supreme Court held that procedural formalities cannot be used to deny regularization of service to an employee whose appointment was termed "temporary" but has performed the same duties as performed by the regular employee over a considerable period in the capacity of the regular employee.
Setting aside the High Court's decision which had declined to regularize the employment of employees who were serving continuously in the capacities of regular employees, the Bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and KV Viswanathan observed that since the employees were appointed through a valid selection process akin to the selection process of the regular employee and were serving continuously for about 25 years, therefore, "the failure to recognize the substantive nature of their roles and their continuous service akin to permanent employees runs counter to the principles of equity, fairness, and the intent behind employment regulations."
"The continuous service of the appellants in the capacities of regular employees, performing duties indistinguishable from those in permanent posts, and their selection through a process that mirrors that of regular recruitment, constitute a substantive departure from the temporary and scheme-specific nature of their initial engagement.", the order dictated by Justice Vikram Nath said.
Before the Supreme Court, in support of the High Court's decision to reject the regularization of the appellants/employees' service, the respondent upon placing reliance on the Judgment of Secretary, State of Karnataka vs. Umadevi contended that the appellant's employment under a temporary scheme could not confer upon them the rights akin to those held by permanent employees.
Umadevi's Distinguished By Supreme Court
The court held that the High Court had incorrectly applied the ratio of Umadevi in the present case. The court in Umadevi termed appointments through back door entry as irregular and invalid. Distinguishing Umadevi's case from the present case, after recording that the appellants have gone through the valid selection process by appearing in the written exams and viva voce, the court held that service conditions of the appellants warrant a reclassification from temporary to regular status.
It is worthwhile to mention that in Umadevi's case, the court had distinguished between “irregular” and “illegal” appointments underscoring the importance of considering certain appointments even if were not made strictly in accordance with the prescribed Rules and Procedure.
"The appointment cannot be said to have been made illegally if they had followed the procedures of regular appointments such as the conduct of written examinations or interviews as in the present case.", the court observed while referring to Umadevi.
Accordingly, the court allowed the appeal and directed the regularization of the appellant's services.
Case Title: VINOD KUMAR & ORS. ETC. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Citation : 2024 LiveLaw (SC) 330
NEET-PG : Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Seeking Extension Of Internship Cut-Off Date For NEET PG 2024
NEET-PG : Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Seeking Extension Of Internship Cut-Off Date For NEET PG 2024
29 Apr 2024 2:55 PM
The Supreme Court today (April 26) refused to entertain a petition seeking an extension of internship cut-off for the upcoming NEET PG 2024 examinations.
The counsel appearing for the petitioners stressed that non-extension may lead to him losing out on the time and efforts which were put in as a candidate. He urged "My precious year will be at a lost ....eligibility till 15 August is already given."
Seemingly in disagreement to interfere, the CJI remarked, " We cannot extend that. ...I mean people are bound to fall on the side of a particular line when there is a cut-off. "
The bench of CJI Chandrachud and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra dismissed the petition, considering it to be an issue falling strictly within the policy domain. The Court however allowed the petitioners to approach the competent authorities in pursuance of the previous representations which have already been made.
The bench directed the following: "The fixation of a cut-off for appearing in the NEET-PG Examination is a matter of policy. Any cut-off would affect students. It will be open to the Petitioners to pursue the representations within one week."
NEET PG 2024 is scheduled to take place on June 23, 2024. The present cut-off date for internship is August 15, 2024.
Earlier, a petition was filed in the Supreme Court seeking the extension of the internship cut off for the NEET-MDS. Responding to the petition, the Centre informed the Court in March that the cut-off for NEET MDS was extended from March 31 to June 30.
Case Details : RIDDHESH vs. UNION OF INDIA W.P.(C) No. 000263 - / 2024
Monday, April 29, 2024
Retrospective Re-Fixing Of Salary And Pension Benefits After Retirement Is Against Law: Madras High Court
Retrospective Re-Fixing Of Salary And Pension Benefits After Retirement Is Against Law: Madras High Court
29 Apr 2024 1:30 PM
The Madras High Court recently set aside an order of the Registrar of Madurai Kamaraj University reducing a former Lab Assistant's scale of pay and subsequently reducing the pension amount.
Justice RN Manjula that after retirement, the employer-employee relationship between the petitioner and the University had come to an end and the University held no authority to re-fix the salary and consequential benefits of the petitioner.
“The petitioner was retired from service by superannuation and hence, the employer - employee relationship between the petitioner and the second respondent University had come to an end and hence, the second respondent University holds no Authority to re-fix the salary and the consequential benefits of the petitioner,” the court observed.
The court also observed that as far as universities were concerned, only a Syndicate had the power to appoint the university and fix their emoluments. Thus, in the court's view, the retrospective re-fixation of salary and subsequent reduction of pension amount based on Local fund audit objection was against the law and liable to be set aside.
“As held in the above Judgment, only the Syndicate has the power to appoint the University staffs and fix their emoluments. The re-fixation of salary and consequential pensionary benefits post retirement retrospectively, in the opinion of this Court, is not in accordance with law and hence the impugned orders are liable to be set aside,” the court said.
The court made the orders on a plea by R Rajamani, who was working as a Lab Assistant at Madurai Kamaraj University. Rajamani had retired from service on November 11, 1988. He had challenged an order from the University Registrar reducing his scale of pay on the basis that it was wrongly fixed. The registrar stated that the Local Fund Audit Department had raised objections and observed that the pay fixation was wrongly made on a higher scale.
Rajamani informed the court that though the pension amount was reduced from December 2023, the impugned order was passed only in March 2024. He added that he was not issued with any prior notice before issuing the impugned order.
The court relied on an earlier order wherein it had observed that Government Order could not superseded by any statutory provisions that govern the service conditions of the employees. The court also relied on the Apex Court order in State of Jharkhand vs. Jitendra Kumar, wherein the Apex Court had held that the right to receive a pension was a right in property and executive instructions could not have a statutory character and could not be called as law.
The court thus set aside the order of the Registrar and directed the University to reimburse the recovered amount with interest within a period of 12 weeks.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.T.C.S.Thillainayagam
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr.T.Amjadkhan Government Advocate, Mr.Ashaiq Ismail for Mr.T.Cibi Chakraborthy
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 175
Case Title: R Rajamani v The State of Tamil Nadu
Case No: W.P.(MD)No.9989 of 2024
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
கொலுசு அணிந்த சரஸ்வதி * நாகப்பட்டினம் மாவட்டம் கடலங்குடியில் உள்ள சிவன் கோவிலில் வளையல், கொலுசு அணிந்தபடி சரஸ்வதிதேவி காட்சியளிக்கிறாள். ச...
-
கட்சியிலிருந்து நேற்றே ஒதுங்கிவிட்டேன்! டி.டி.வி.தினகரன் தடாலடி பேட்டி vikatan news ராகினி ஆத்ம வெண்டி மு. படம்: ஸ்ரீநிவாசலு 'அ.த...