NEET PG: 52% top rankers in state choose general med

NEET PG: 52% top rankers in state choose general med

Preference In Sync With Nat’l Trend 

Sruthysusan.Ullas@timesofindia.com  12.11.2026

Bengaluru: The favourite MD/MS programme of NEET-PG aspirants in Karnataka is in tune with the national trend. While the first student to take a seat chose MD in radio diagnosis, around 52% of the students who picked a seat through Karnataka Examinations Authority (KEA) counselling went for general medicine. 

As per the final allotment list of the first round of counselling, 52 of the top 100 students chose general medicine. MD in radio diagnosis was the second most chosen branch (25 seats), followed by MD in dermatology (11 seats). Together, these top three non-surgical specialties accounted for 88% of all allotments. 

Surgical and procedural specialties like MS in orthopaedics, general surgery and obstetrics & gynaecology (OBG) and MD in paediatrics made up the remaining 12 seats. The trend is similar to that witnessed at the medical counselling committee’s counselling. 

“Radio diagnosis has taken a hit after a general feeling that artificial intelligence will affect the prospects of the stream. Orthopedics and surgery seem to have reached a saturation stage. General medicine is the new favourite now. It covers a wide range of subjects and aspirants feel they have a lot of options to pursue in super speciality ranging from nephrology to geriatric medicine. 

They can work independently in their own clinics and also have the opportunity to have constant interaction with patients,” said Bhagavan BC, vice-chancellor, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (RGUHS). Meanwhile, colleges are worried about seats in pre- and para-clinical courses going vacant. 

“Like last year, we will continue to waive the fees for some of the pre- and para-clinical courses as we are unable to find takers. The number of queries are low for these programmes this year too. The students will get stipends,” said the chairperson of a private college in Bengaluru. Many colleges also provide placements for these students as faculty in their departments. Karnataka has 9,887 seats this academic year, the highest in the country. Last year, over 700 seats were vacant in the state.

Adult vaccination remains low, elderly miss cover against flu, pneumonia and shingles

Adult vaccination remains low, elderly miss cover against flu, pneumonia and shingles 

10.11.2026  TIMES BHOPAL

Anuja.Jaiswal@timesofindia.com New Delhi: 

Despite vaccines being available to prevent several infections that can be particularly serious for older people, adult immunisation remains low in India. Influenza, pneumococcal disease and shingles are among the key vaccine-preventable illnesses that pose a risk to older people, but studies point to poor awareness and low uptake of these vaccines. 

Ahead of World Immunisation Day Tuesday (Nov 10), the findings highlight a significant gap in protection beyond childhood. A multicentre study of 4,998 people aged 60 and above across Chennai, Ballabgarh, Kolkata and Pune found only 1.4% had ever received an influenza vaccine. While just 19.7% had heard of influenza, 35.9% considered vaccines safe and 65.3% were unwilling to pay for vaccination. 

However, uptake rose to 29.7% when vaccines were offered free of cost at community health camps. Published in ‘BMC Public Health’ in 2026, the study highlights gaps in awareness, acceptance and access to vaccination among older people. The disease burden is substantial. A separate study published in ‘Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses’ in April 2026 estimated that influenza among Indians aged 60 and above accounted for 5.3 million respiratory infections, 36,149 hospitalisations and 84,613 deaths in 2021. 

The researchers found that an annual influenza vaccination programme for older adults could be cost-effective under most of the scenarios assessed. “Influenza and pneumococcal infections cause a significant burden among older Indians, accounting for an estimated 1.2 lakh deaths annually. Studies show that influenza vaccination can reduce influenza-associated pneumonia cases by 52% and deaths by 70%, while pneumococcal vaccination can lower hospitalisations by around 27% and deaths by 34%. 

Yet vaccination coverage among the elderly remains very low,” said Dr Neetu Jain, senior consultant, pulmonology, critical care and sleep medicine, PSRI Hospital. “Annual flu and pneumococcal vaccination is particularly important for people above 60 and those with COPD, asthma, diabetes or heart disease, as infections can lead to serious complications, including respiratory failure and prolonged hospitalisation,” she said. 

Evidence is also emerging of the economic value of pneumococcal vaccination. A study published in ‘Infectious Diseases and Therapy’ in Oct 2026 examined the cost-effectiveness of a single dose of the 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) for older adults and people at higher risk. It found that the vaccine could be a cost-effective option compared with existing vaccination approaches. Another infection of concern among older adults is shingles, caused by reactivation of the virus responsible for chicken pox. It can lead to prolonged nerve pain, known as postherpetic neuralgia. 

A 2026 paper in ‘Indian Journal of Community Medicine’ noted the lack of robust population-based data on shingles in India, while citing an estimate of around 45 lakh cases annually. An Indian phase-3 trial of the recombinant zoster vaccine, published in ‘Vaccine’ in 2025, reported an immune response in 85.7% of participants aged 50 and above. “Influenza and pneumococcal vaccines can reduce cases of severe illness, hospitalisation and complications, particularly among older people and those with chronic conditions such as diabetes, heart disease and COPD. 

Both are non-live vaccines and can be given to elderly people, including those with multiple conditions,” said Dr Jatin Ahuja, infectious disease specialist, Apollo Hospitals, Delhi. “India also needs to expand adult vaccination to cover shingles. The two-dose recombinant zoster vaccine is recommended for adults aged 50 and above and offers over 90% protection. Tdap or Td boosters, hepatitis B and, where indicated, Covid-19 and RSV vaccines should also be considered,” he said. Goa has taken a step towards expanding vaccination beyond childhood through its Lifecourse Immunisation Policy 2026-2036, launched in Sept. 

The policy identifies influenza, pneumococcal and hepatitis B vaccination among its priorities for elderly, those with chronic illnesses, immunocompromised individuals and healthcare workers. 

Anti-cancer drug prices revised; consumers to save 3,540cr/year

Anti-cancer drug prices revised; consumers to save 3,540cr/year 

10.11.2026  TIMES AHEMEDABAD

New Delhi: Revised Maximum Retail Prices (MRPs) of 1,364 anti-cancer formulations came into effect Monday, a move projected to save consumers an estimated Rs 3,540.38 crore annually, according to an official release. 

National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA), functioning under the Department of Pharmaceuticals, capped trade margins on the MRP of 137 anti-cancer drugs based on recommendations submitted on Oct 17, 2026, by an Expert Committee constituted by the directorate general of health services (DGHS), ministry of health & family welfare. 

According to the ministry, 85 pharmaceutical companies reported revised MRPs for 1,364 anti-cancer formulations across 121 drugs as of Nov 8, 2026. Price reductions of over 50% have been reported for 679 brands, with the highest price cut recorded at 96.45%, ministry of chemicals and fertilizers: department of pharmaceuticals said in the release. 

The ministry stated that no chemist or hospital pharmacy is permitted to charge more than the revised MRP. Consumers can verify medicine rates via the revised MRP printed on packs, the ‘Pharma Sahi Daam’ mobile application, or the official NPPA website (nppa.gov.in), it said. Consumers can lodge complaints against instances of overcharging or other pricing-related issues through the Pharma Jan Samadhan portal or contact the NPPA helpline at 1800-111- 255, the release added. PTI

‘No salary discrimination must be there between clinical & non-clinical branch residents’

No salary discrimination must be there between clinical & non-clinical branch residents’ 

04.11.2026. TIMES CHENNAI

The report was filed after detailed deliberations and consideration of suggestions made by senior advocate Maninder Singh, who is assisting Supreme Court as amicus curiae. 

“NMC is in process of issuing new regulations, which are yet to be finalised wherein only rank-based system for NEET PG & SS counselling will be adopted; no percentile marks will be declared in results; only ranks will be given to the candidates. 

A letter dated Oct 1 has been written by secretary, NMC to DGHS informing proposal for changing the existing percentile-based system to a rank-based merit system for NEET-PG and NEET-SS which is under consideration by the commission. 

The commission has accorded in-principle approval for the proposed change with a view to address the issues arising from the existing system,” the report said. On reduction of the minimum qualification, the report said, “The sanctity of NEET examinations should be maintained and minimum qualifying standards in postgraduate medical education is not diluted to the extent of permitting candidates with grossly inadequate or negative performance to become eligible for admission”. 

It also suggested that there should be no salary discrimination between residents of clinical and non-clinical branches and incentives should be provided to doctors to work in rural areas. SC is examining various petitions challenging Centre’s decision to drastically reduce the qualifying cut-off percentiles for NEET-PG 2025. Under the revised criteria, the qualifying score for general category was reduced from 276 to 103, while that for the SC/ST/OBC categories was brought down from 235 to -40.

NMC weighs five-year rotation of HoDs after stakeholder feedback

NMC weighs five-year rotation of HoDs after stakeholder feedback

TNN | Oct 24, 2026, 07.43 PM IST

NEW DELHI: The National Medical Commission (NMC) is considering a revised proposal to rotate heads of departments (HoDs) in medical colleges every five years, instead of the three-year tenure proposed earlier, following feedback from stakeholders.

Under the revised proposal, rotation would be restricted to professors, rather than including both professors and eligible associate professors as envisaged in the draft amendment published in May 2025, M K Ramesh, president of the Medical Assessment and Rating Board (MARB), told TOI.

Ramesh said the commission had received substantial feedback on the earlier proposal and that valid points raised by stakeholders would be considered. Suggestions included rotation periods of five or 10 years, as well as doing away with mandatory rotation altogether.

The original draft amendment to the Postgraduate Medical Education Regulations, 2023, proposed rotating the HoD post every three years among eligible professors and associate professors, based on seniority. Nearly a year and a half after the draft was published, the proposal remains unresolved.

Ramesh said the proposal would need to be taken up afresh and that the revised draft would be moved shortly. Once initiated, the process would be completed within six weeks, he said.

He did not confirm whether the NMC would invite stakeholders to comment again on the revised proposal or take a decision based on the feedback already received.

The delay had also prompted an RTI application by Dr A N Dattatri, professor and head of the department of pharmacology at Karnataka Medical College and Research Institute, Hubballi, seeking the PGMEB’s detailed note on stakeholder feedback and its views on the proposal. In a reply dated September 16, 2026, the board said the matter was under consideration and declined to disclose the information, citing Section 8(1)(i) of the RTI Act.

The proposed change could affect how leadership positions are assigned in medical college departments. The five-year rotation plan remains a proposal and has not yet been formally notified.

All MBBS seats allotted in state counselling stray round

All MBBS seats allotted in state counselling stray round 

24.10.2026 TIMES CHENNAI

Chennai: The state selection committee allotted every MBBS seat under its counselling process by the end of the stray round. This is in sharp contrast to central counselling, which left more than 800 seats in deemed universities unfilled. While annual fees of up to 35 lakh kept students away from deemed universities, a late fee cut helped one private university fill more than 100 seats in the state’s final round. 

The state’s stray round opened with 311 MBBS seats. The allotment list published on Thursday showed that the committee had allotted every seat based on NEET merit and reservation rules. In BDS, 49 seats remained vacant, none in govt colleges. 

Officials in the committee say most students who opt for seats in the stray round take them as penalties are high. Closing ranks showed that in govt colleges, admissions reached further down the state merit list in the open, BC and BCM categories, even though the corresponding NEET scores rose. “This was because more students got into govt medical colleges this year. The state added 150 seats to its seat matrix,” an official said. MBC, SC, SCA and ST categories, however, closed at better ranks than last year. In self-financing colleges, where annual tuition for govt-quota students is up to 4.50 lakh, open-category, BC and MBC admission ranks rose marginally, while BCM showed a larger shift. SC, SCA and ST admissions closed at better ranks. 

The largest shifts came in private universities. At Sri Venkateswaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, the prescribed annual tuition for govt-quota students was 5.40 lakh, but the institution said that it would charge 20 lakh, said student counsellor Manickavel Arumugam. “Fee is one of the key factors in admissions,” he said. “After three rounds, the college had more than 130 vacant seats. It reduced tuition to 7.40 lakh for govt quota seats and 16.40 lakh for management-quota seats. All seats were allotted.” Times News Network

FMG interns detained after protest for equal stipends

FMG interns detained after protest for equal stipends

23.10.2026

Sakshat.Tornekar@timesofindia.com  TIMES HYDERABAD 

Hyderabad: Foreign Medical Graduates (FMGs) interning at govt general hospitals in Telangana were allegedly detained by Hyderabad police during a protest outside the Directorate of Medical Education (DME) office in Koti on Thursday. The protesters were demanding stipend parity with Indian Medical Graduates (IMGs). A Sultan Bazaar police officer said around 91 protesters were taken into preventive custody at 3 pm and released at around 7 pm. 

Police said the protesters were taken to the Malakpet, Dabeerpura and Chikkadpally police stations. The action was taken because “protests were not permitted outside the DME office,” the officer said. “We have been asking for equal pay for equal work, but nobody is willing to meet us. The DME is avoiding us, and neither the health secretary nor the health minister has agreed to meet us. We have not received any written assurance so far,” said Suhas Mareedu, 27, an FMG intern who studied medicine in Jamaica. 

The protesting doctors cited a National Medical Commission (NMC) public notice dated Nov 22, 2023, in support of their demand for stipend parity. The notice provides for stipends on a par with those of IMGs for specified categories of FMGs, including students who completed their medical education in Ukraine. However, the applicability of these provisions to the protesting doctors, including those who graduated from other countries, remains to be clarified. 

The FMGs said they had been raising the issue for nearly a month after informing the DME of their proposed protest on Sept 23. They had earlier staged demonstrations at Dharna Chowk, People’s Plaza and the Telangana State Medical Council office before gathering outside the DME office on Thursday

Denotification of rules won’t dilute med edu standards: NMC

Denotification of rules won’t dilute med edu standards: NMC 

23.10.2026

The National Medical Commission (NMC) has said that the denotification of the 2023 medical standards regulations was done only as a “measure of regulatory rationalisation intended to remove overlapping procedures” and that it would not “in any manner, dilute the prescribed standards of medical education or the regulatory oversight exercised by NMC”. 

It said that under the NMC Act, undergraduate and post-graduate medical education boards were primarily entrusted with prescribing academic standards, while the Medical Assessment and Rating Board (MARB) was empowered to initiate “appropriate regulatory measures against institutions found deficient”. 

The 2023 regulations created a “parallel mechanism” and the NMC decided after “judicial observations and a detailed examination of the statutory framework” to “remove this duplication”. “NMC remains committed to maintaining the highest standards of medical education while ensuring that regulation is transparent, effective and free from unnecessary duplication,” it said. tnn

NMC denotifies medical education standards rules

NMC denotifies medical education standards rules 

22.10.2026 TIMES BENGALURU

The National Medical Commission has denotified the Maintenance of Standards of Medical Education Regulations, 2023 (MSMER-2023). 

With the denotification, all specific penalties against medical institutions that fail to comply with any of the statutory provisions and regulations or minimum standards are no longer applicable. 

The notification states that any action taken while the regulation was in force would not be affected by the denotification. However, the NMC has not taken any action against many colleges found flouting regulations as in the case of non-payment of mandatory stipend to MBBS interns and doctors doing postgraduation. 

With the denotification, medical colleges have little to fear if they do not pay stipend in future as the penalty for specific violations is not specified in the NMC Act. The Act only states that the Medical Assessment and Rating Board (MARB) shall take such measures, including issuing warning, imposition of monetary penalty, reducing intake or stoppage of admissions or recommendation for withdrawal of recognition against a medical institution for failure to maintain the minimum essential standards specified.

 “Notwithstanding such de-notification, the requirement of furnishing the Annual Disclosure Report (ADR) shall continue to operate” in accordance with the relevant sections of the NMC Act 2019, stated the denotification announcement gazetted on October 14. The NMC Act stipulates that the Under-Graduate Medical Education Board and the Post-Graduate Medical Education Board shall specify norms for compulsory annual disclosures, electronically or otherwise, by medical institutions. 

The 2019 Act also states that MARB may conduct evaluation and assessment of any medical institution at any time without prior notice to assess and evaluate the institution’s performance, standards and benchmarks. However, denotification has also removed requirements for evaluation reports to verify physical infrastructure, required faculty numbers and review student feedback.

AIIMS Madurai to open with 150 beds in Jan, says MP

AIIMS Madurai to open with 150 beds in Jan, says MP 

21.10.2026

Madurai: All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Madurai will begin functioning with 150 beds from Jan 2027, AIADMK Rajya Sabha MP IS Inbadurai said on Tuesday following a meeting with institute director Dr Vir Singh Negi. Inbadurai, who was nominated to the institute’s governing body by the Union health ministry in Sept, said Negi briefed him on construction progress at Thoppur. 

“I am happy to learn that Madurai AIIMS will begin functioning with 150 beds in the first phase from January,” he said in a post on X, adding that construction had reached its final stages. The announcement follows Centre’s Sept 17 submission before Madras high court that fullfledged outpatient services would commence on Jan 1, 2027. However, that undertaking did not specify when inpatient services would begin. In its status report, the Centre said overall project completion would reach 59% by Sept-end, with 88% of Phase I and 35% of Phase II works completed. Five batches of MBBS students, previously accommodated at Ramanathapuram Government Medical College, were shifted to the Thoppur campus by Aug 31. Prime Minister Narendra Modi laid the foundation stone in January 2019, but construction began only in May 2024. The project is largely financed through a Japanese development loan. Times News Network

Cardiologists conference held in city

Cardiologists conference held in city 

21.10.2026

Chennai: About 350 cardiologists from India and abroad attended an interventional cardiology conference organised by Promed Hospital in association with Chip-Cto over the weekend. 

The conference, inaugurated by school education minister A Rajmohan, had doctors from Japan, the US and Australia lead the faculty panel. Doctors in Canada, Saudi Arabia and the UK beamed live procedures into the hall. 

Sessions covered torn arteries, valve replacement and cardiac shock. Doctors practised with devices at a training village. “Complications in angioplasty are uncommon, but they will happen to every cardiologist. This will prepare them for that,” said Dr Arun Kalyanasundaram, the organising chairman. TNN

NMC withdraws medical education regulations: What colleges need to know

NMC withdraws medical education regulations: What colleges need to know

The NMC has withdrawn its 2023 medical education standards regulations with immediate effect, retaining mandatory Annual Disclosure Reports.

Existing approvals remain valid, while pending and fresh cases will follow the applicable legal framework.

NMC medical education rules: Commission scraps 2023 regulations, ADR filing remains mandatory

By:India Today Education Desk

New Delhi,Oct 18, 2026 15:30 IST

The National Medical Commission, NMC, has scrapped its 2023 regulations on maintaining standards in medical education, but medical colleges will still have to file Annual Disclosure Reports (ADRs) as required by law.

The decision was announced in a notification dated October 14 and published in the Gazette of India. The regulations, which came into force following their notification on September 19, 2023, and publication in the official gazette on September 21, 2023, have now been withdrawn with immediate effect.

Issued under Sections 10, 24, 25 and 57 of the National Medical Commission Act, 2019, the notification also explains how existing approvals, legal obligations and pending regulatory matters will be handled following the withdrawal.

NMC WITHDRAWS 2023 RULES: WHAT DOES THE NOTIFICATION SAY?

The commission has not specified a separate reason for withdrawing the Maintenance of Standards of Medical Education Regulations, 2023.

However, the notification makes clear that the decision will not retrospectively cancel actions taken while the regulations were in force. Approvals, renewals, orders, decisions and directions issued under the earlier framework will continue to remain valid.

Similarly, rights and privileges already acquired, along with obligations and liabilities incurred before the withdrawal, will not automatically cease to exist. These provisions establish that the removal of the regulations does not, by itself, reverse earlier regulatory decisions or extinguish existing legal responsibilities.

Despite the withdrawal, medical colleges and other medical institutions must continue submitting Annual Disclosure Reports under the applicable legal framework.

"The requirement of furnishing the Annual Disclosure Report (ADR) shall continue to operate in accordance with Section 24(i) and 25(h) of the National Medical Commission Act, 2019 and the regulations applicable from time to time," the notification stated.

ADRs form part of the statutory disclosure requirements applicable to medical institutions. The latest notification does not exempt colleges from these obligations. Institutions must therefore continue to follow the reporting requirements prescribed under the provisions currently in force.

For medical colleges, this means that the withdrawal of the 2023 regulations should not be interpreted as the end of their mandatory disclosure responsibilities.

HOW WILL PENDING NMC CASES AND APPLICATIONS BE HANDLED?

The notification also sets out how regulatory matters already underway will be treated.

Applications, appeals, inquiries, proceedings and other pending matters may continue to be dealt with under the withdrawn 2023 regulations, wherever applicable and in accordance with the conditions specified in the notification.

Matters arising after the date of withdrawal, meanwhile, will be governed by the NMC Act, 2019, and the statutory or regulatory provisions applicable at the time.

The distinction provides continuity for certain matters initiated under the earlier rules while establishing the legal framework for cases arising after their withdrawal.

advertisement

Medical institutions with pending applications or proceedings will need to refer to the notification and the relevant provisions to determine how their individual cases are affected.

WHAT MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS NEED TO KNOW

The withdrawal changes the regulatory framework under which medical education standards were governed, but it does not automatically invalidate earlier approvals or remove existing statutory obligations.

Medical colleges must continue filing Annual Disclosure Reports and comply with the legal and regulatory requirements applicable to them. The status of pending cases will depend on the transitional provisions set out in the NMC notification.

The National Medical Commission is the statutory authority responsible for regulating medical education and the medical profession in India. Its latest notification clarifies the consequences of withdrawing the 2023 regulations while preserving the treatment of specified earlier decisions and pending matters.

(With inputs from PTI)

NEET PG Counselling 2026 Round 1: Complete Timeline and Key Dates

NEET PG Counselling 2026 Round 1: Complete Timeline and Key Dates

https://medadmit.in/updates/neet-pg-counselling-2026-round-1-registration-nri-quota-documents

The Medical Counselling Committee (MCC) has announced that registration for NEET PG Round 1 counselling will open on October 12, 2026. This is a critical window for all MBBS graduates who have cleared the NEET-PG exam and are preparing to secure a postgraduate seat in MD, MS, PG Diploma, or DNB programmes across India. Alongside regular Indian candidates, the MCC has also detailed the specific eligibility criteria and document requirements for candidates applying under the NRI (Non-Resident Indian) quota. Understanding these requirements now will help you prepare your application smoothly and avoid delays during the counselling process.

NEET PG Round 1 registration opens October 12, 2026; NRI candidates must submit category-specific documents during registration, with a document verification process and correction window built into the timeline.

The MCC has released the full schedule for NEET PG Round 1 counselling, which will run from October 12 to November 2, 2026. Registration and fee payment will occur from October 12 to 21, while choice filling and locking will run concurrently from October 13 to 22. This overlap means you can begin selecting your preferred colleges and specialities even as the registration window remains open, giving you flexibility to refine your choices as you gather information.

The allotment process will take place on October 22 and 23, with results announced on October 24. Candidates who receive a seat allocation will then have until November 2 to report to their allotted college. This compressed timeline underscores the importance of having all documents ready before October 12, as delays in verification could cost you the opportunity to lock in your choices during the choice-filling window.Registration and fee payment: October 12–21, 2026

Choice filling and locking: October 13–22, 2026

Allotment process: October 22–23, 2026

Seat allotment result: October 24, 2026

Reporting to colleges: October 26 – November 2, 2026

Who Is Eligible for NRI Quota Admissions in NEET PG?

The NRI quota in NEET PG is open to candidates who meet specific residency and relationship criteria. If either of your parents is an NRI (Non-Resident Indian) and residing abroad, you qualify for NRI quota admission. Similarly, if a first-degree relative—defined as a real brother or sister, or a parent—is an NRI and residing abroad, you are eligible. This definition is important because it clarifies that only blood relations count; in-laws or extended family do not qualify.

Additionally, candidates who initially registered as Indian during the NEET-PG exam but now wish to apply under the NRI category are permitted to do so during counselling registration. This flexibility is valuable for candidates whose family circumstances may have changed or who did not initially realize they were eligible for the NRI quota. However, such category conversion requires submission of additional documentation and verification by the MCC's Document Verification Committee (DVC).

One or both parents are NRI and residing abroad

Real brother or sister is NRI and residing abroad

Candidates can convert from Indian to NRI category during counselling registration

NRI Category I: Standard NRI, Parent, Sibling, or Relative Applicants

Category I is the most common NRI quota pathway and applies to candidates whose parent, real brother, or real sister is an NRI. To apply under this category, you must submit a comprehensive set of documents that establish your educational history, medical qualifications, and the NRI status of your sponsor. The documents begin with your Date of Birth Certificate and extend through your 10th and 12th mark sheets, along with equivalence certificates from the Association of Indian Universities (AIU) if your schooling was outside India.

Your MBBS examination mark sheets from all three professional years are mandatory. If you completed your MBBS outside India, you must also provide your FMGE (Foreign Medical Graduate Examination) scorecard. Your NEET-PG scorecard issued by the National Board of Examinations (NBE) is essential, as is a valid passport. Critically, you must obtain an NRI Certificate from the competent authority—either the Indian Embassy or an Indian Consulate in the country where your sponsor resides. This certificate is the official proof of NRI status and cannot be substituted.

Finally, you must submit a notarised affidavit on Rs 100 stamp paper from your NRI sponsor (parent, brother, or sister) confirming their commitment to fund your entire course fees and living expenses during your postgraduate studies. 

This affidavit must be supported by bank account documentation—specifically, an NRE (Non-Resident External) or NRO (Non-Resident Ordinary) Bank Account Passbook showing the sponsor's financial capacity. 

A revenue authority officer (Tehsildar, Patwari, or Government Officer in the Revenue Department) must also verify your relationship to the sponsor.

Date of Birth Certificate

10th and 12th mark sheets with AIU equivalence certificate (if applicable)

MBBS 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Professional Examination mark sheets

FMGE scorecard (if MBBS completed outside India)

NEET-PG scorecard from NBE

Valid passport

NRI Certificate from Embassy or Indian Consulate

Notarised affidavit (Rs 100 stamp paper) from NRI sponsor confirming financial support

NRE/NRO Bank Account Passbook of sponsor

Relationship verification by revenue authority officer

NRI Category II: OCI (Overseas Citizen of India) Applicants

Overseas Citizens of India (OCI) form a distinct category within the NRI quota. OCI status is granted to foreign nationals of Indian origin or their descendants who wish to maintain a connection with India. If you hold an OCI card, you can apply for NEET PG postgraduate seats under this category. The document requirements for OCI applicants are similar to Category I in most respects but differ in one critical way: instead of an NRI Certificate and a sponsorship affidavit, you must submit your valid OCI Card.

Like Category I applicants, you must provide your 

Date of Birth Certificate, 

10th and 12th mark sheets (with AIU equivalence certificates if applicable), 

MBBS examination mark sheets from all three years,

FMGE scorecard (if your MBBS was outside India), 

NEET-PG scorecard, and a valid passport. 

The OCI Card itself serves as proof of your eligibility and status, eliminating the need for an Embassy certificate or sponsorship documentation. This streamlined requirement reflects the fact that OCI status is already a recognized legal status granted by the Government of India.

Date of Birth Certificate

10th and 12th mark sheets with AIU equivalence certificate (if applicable)

MBBS 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Professional Examination mark sheets

FMGE scorecard (if MBBS completed outside India)

NEET-PG scorecard from NBE

Valid passport

Valid Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) Card

NRI Category III: Foreign National Applicants

Foreign nationals who have completed their MBBS in India or abroad and have qualified in NEET-PG can also apply for NRI quota seats. This category is designed for candidates who hold citizenship of a country other than India and do not hold OCI status. The document requirements are largely identical to those for OCI applicants, with one key difference: instead of an OCI Card, you must submit your citizenship certificate along with your foreign passport.

All other documentation—

Date of Birth Certificate, 

10th and 12th mark sheets, 

MBBS examination mark sheets, 

FMGE scorecard if applicable, and NEET-PG scorecard—remains the same. 

The citizenship certificate serves as proof of your nationality and is typically issued by the government of your country of citizenship. This category ensures that international medical graduates who have qualified through NEET-PG have a clear pathway to postgraduate medical education in India.

Date of Birth Certificate

10th and 12th mark sheets with AIU equivalence certificate (if applicable)

MBBS 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Professional Examination mark sheets

FMGE scorecard (if MBBS completed outside India)

NEET-PG scorecard from NBE

Valid foreign passport

Citizenship certificate

NRI Category IV: Indian Candidates Converting to NRI Status During Counselling

Some candidates register for NEET-PG as Indian citizens but later discover they are eligible for the NRI quota—for example, if a parent recently obtained NRI status or if they were unaware of their eligibility at the time of exam registration. The MCC permits such candidates to convert their category from Indian to NRI during the counselling registration phase. This conversion requires submission of all standard educational and examination documents, plus proof of NRI status and sponsorship.

In addition to the documents required for Category I applicants, candidates converting from Indian to NRI must provide evidence of guardianship if they claim sponsorship by a legal guardian rather than a parent or sibling. 

This evidence might include school or college fee receipts showing payment by the claimed guardian, educational records reflecting the guardian's involvement, bank or payment records evidencing financial support, or other relevant documentation establishing that the person has genuinely cared for and supported the candidate for the required period. 

A notarised affidavit from the guardian is also mandatory, confirming their commitment to sponsor the entire course and living expenses, supported by NRE/NRO Bank Account documentation.

Date of Birth Certificate

10th and 12th mark sheets with AIU equivalence certificate (if applicable)

MBBS 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Professional Examination mark sheets

FMGE scorecard (if MBBS completed outside India)

NEET-PG scorecard from NBE

Valid passport

NRI Certificate from Embassy or Indian Consulate

Notarised affidavit from NRI sponsor or legal guardian (Rs 100 stamp paper)

NRE/NRO Bank Account Passbook of sponsor

Documentary evidence of guardianship (fee receipts, educational records, bank statements, etc.)

Relationship verification by revenue authority officer

Step-by-Step Process for NRI Document Submission and Category Verification

The MCC has established a structured 10-step process to ensure transparent and fair verification of NRI documents. The process begins when you select the NRI quota during registration on the MCC portal on October 12. If you initially registered as Indian during the NEET-PG exam but now wish to apply as NRI, you must still select the NRI option at this stage. Next, you will select your specific NRI subcategory (Category I, II, III, or IV) based on your eligibility.

You will then upload all supporting documents as scanned copies through the MCC portal during registration. The MCC's Document Verification Committee will scrutinise these documents online. If discrepancies or deficiencies are found—such as missing pages, unclear scans, or incomplete information—the committee will raise a document discrepancy query. You will be notified of any issues via SMS and email, and a correction window will be provided to resolve the query within a stipulated timeframe. During this window, you can edit, modify, or resubmit corrected documents online.

Once all documents are found to be in order, your category will be converted from Indian to NRI (if applicable), and you will become eligible to access the NRI category seat list and select NRI quota seats during choice filling. 

Importantly, if you are unable to produce required documents within the correction window during Round 1, you can still participate in Round 2 counselling, giving you a second opportunity to submit and verify your documents.

Step 1: Select NRI quota during registration on MCC portal

Step 2: Select your NRI subcategory (I, II, III, or IV)

Step 3: Upload all supporting documents as scanned copies

Step 4: MCC Document Verification Committee reviews documents online

Step 5: Committee raises discrepancy query if issues are found

Step 6: Candidate notified via SMS and email of discrepancies

Step 7: Correction window provided to resolve issues and resubmit documents

Step 8: Category converted to NRI once all documents are verified

Step 9: Candidate becomes eligible to access NRI seat list and select choices

Step 10: Candidates unable to complete verification in Round 1 can participate in Round 2

Practical Checklist: What NRI Candidates Must Do Before October 12

To ensure a smooth registration and verification process, begin preparing your documents immediately. Gather all original certificates and mark sheets, and arrange for certified scans or digital copies. If any of your educational documents are from outside India, obtain equivalence certificates from the Association of Indian Universities (AIU) well in advance, as this process can take time. If your MBBS was completed outside India, ensure you have your FMGE scorecard. Verify that your passport is valid and will remain valid throughout your postgraduate course.

If you are applying under Category I, contact the Indian Embassy or Consulate in your sponsor's country of residence to obtain the NRI Certificate. This is a critical document and should not be delayed.

Prepare the notarised affidavit from your NRI sponsor on Rs 100 stamp paper, and gather the NRE/NRO Bank Account Passbook pages showing the sponsor's financial capacity. If you are converting from Indian to NRI status, collect all guardianship evidence (fee receipts, educational records, bank statements) and arrange for relationship verification by a revenue authority officer. Finally, ensure all documents are scanned clearly in PDF or JPG format, as poor-quality scans may be rejected during verification.Gather and certify all educational mark sheets and certificates

Obtain AIU equivalence certificates for education completed outside India

Secure FMGE scorecard if MBBS was outside India

Verify passport validity

Obtain NRI Certificate from Embassy/Consulate (Category I applicants)

Prepare notarised affidavit from NRI sponsor on Rs 100 stamp paper

Collect NRE/NRO Bank Account Passbook pages

Gather guardianship evidence if converting from Indian to NRI

Arrange relationship verification by revenue authority officer

Scan all documents clearly in PDF or JPG format

Why This Matters for Your NEET PG Admission Journey

The NRI quota represents a significant pathway for eligible candidates to secure postgraduate medical seats in India. For MBBS graduates with NRI family connections, this quota often offers competitive advantages in terms of seat availability and choice options. However, the document verification process is rigorous, and incomplete or incorrect submissions can delay your category conversion and limit your ability to select from the full range of available seats during choice filling.

Understanding the specific requirements for your NRI category now—before registration opens—allows you to prepare methodically and avoid last-minute scrambling. The MCC's structured verification process, while thorough, includes a correction window, but relying on this window means you may miss the opportunity to lock in your preferred choices during the main choice-filling period. By submitting complete, accurate documents on the first attempt, you maximise your chances of swift verification and full participation in the counselling process.

NMC refuses to disclose information on action against private colleges over unpaid PG stipends

NMC refuses to disclose information on action against private colleges over unpaid PG stipends

In 2023, NMC said 2,110 students reported no stipend, 4,288 said they were paid less than students at govt medical colleges in their states, 1,228 said colleges took back money after paying them.

Sneha Richhariya

13 October, 2026 05:09 pm IST

New Delhi: The National Medical Commission (NMC) has refused to disclose action taken against private medical colleges accused of withholding or underpaying stipends to postgraduate (PG) medical students, citing an exemption under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005.

In a reply dated 8 October 2026 to an RTI application filed by Kerala-based doctor K. V. Babu, the medical regulator declined to share details of action taken following its own 2023 survey, which found that thousands of postgraduate students at private medical colleges were either not receiving stipends, being paid less than their counterparts in government colleges, or being forced to return the money.

The refusal comes after the commission told the Supreme Court in August 2026 that all 564 medical colleges offering postgraduate courses had reported paying stipends to their students and resident doctors. The affidavit listed the amounts reported by individual colleges but did not reveal whether payments had been independently verified or whether complaints recorded in the earlier survey had been resolved.

In its 24 August 2023 advisory, the NMC’s Post Graduate Medical Education Board said 2,110 students reported receiving no stipend, 4,288 said they were paid less than students at government medical colleges in their respective states, and 1,228 said their colleges took back the money after paying them.

The regulator had then warned private medical colleges of strict action for non-compliance. However, the latest RTI reply does not clarify whether any institution was penalised for non-payment or underpayment.

“There is not even a single instance of NMC taking any action against those medical colleges, which are defaulters in paying stipend to PG doctors/interns. Still, they have no hesitation in filing entirely different data in the Supreme Court of India. It is time to take action against NMC officials, who are not submitting the exact data in the SC,” Dr Babu said.

Last week, a senior NMC official told ThePrint that the commission would take stricter action against institutions violating stipend rules, including financial penalties and possible consequences for accreditation.

The official also said the Undergraduate Medical Education Board had recently imposed monetary penalties on eight institutions for failing to submit stipend-related information. However, Dr Babu said these penalties were for not submitting records, not for failing to pay stipends.

Stipend rules and enforcement

Under Section 5.4 of the Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2023, postgraduate students pursuing degree, diploma and super-speciality courses at private colleges must receive stipends at par with students at state or central government medical institutions in the same state or Union Territory.

The issue also extends to undergraduate interns. The NMC’s Compulsory Rotating Medical Internship (CRMI) Regulations, 2021, require interns to be paid the stipend fixed by the appropriate authority applicable to their institution, university or state. Unlike the postgraduate regulations, they do not explicitly require parity with interns at government medical colleges in the same state.

Dr Babu said he had raised this discrepancy with the Union Health Ministry in June 2022. Following this, the ministry’s Medical Education Policy section asked the NMC in November 2025 to examine the issue and sent a reminder on 15 December 2025.

Later, in a response dated 18 February 2026, the NMC’s Undergraduate Medical Education Board said any amendment to the CRMI regulations would require consideration through the statutory process and consultation with authorities concerned.

In an RTI reply dated 17 July 2026, the commission then said the February letter had been sent in response to inputs sought by the ministry and that stakeholders would be consulted when the regulations were revised or amended.

Responding to ThePrint’s queries on whether a decision had been taken to initiate amendments to CRMI regulations, a senior NMC official said, “The fixation of stipend rates involves the respective state governments and competent authorities, and requires wider stakeholder consultation. The regulatory intent & stated position of the commission is very clear on this. No definitive timeline can be indicated at this stage, as the action lies at the level of respective states. The issue is a continuous discussion point with the states.”

Regarding actions taken against defaulter colleges, the official said, “NMC has consistently maintained that payment of the prescribed stipend to postgraduate medical students is mandatory and that the regulatory non-compliance is viewed seriously. Complaints regarding non-payment or irregular payment are examined, and appropriate action is initiated against defaulting institutions in accordance with the applicable regulations.”

On the denial of information in response to the RTI, the official said, “The response to a particular RTI application needs to be checked with the concerned CPIO (Central Public Information Officer) and the same has to conform to the provisions of the RTI Act.”

HC upholds striking down of G.O. cancelling retired govt. doctors’ enhanced pension

HC upholds striking down of G.O. cancelling retired govt. doctors’ enhanced pension

The Hindu Bureau

MADURAI 13.10.2026

A two-judge Bench of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has upheld a single judge’s order quashing a Government Order (G.O.) issued in 2025, which cancelled the enhanced pension and family pension granted to retired State government doctors/medical officers and their families.

A Division Bench of Justices C.V. Karthikeyan and R. Sakthivel said the G.O. had been issued only under Rule 56 of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978. But, there should be a corresponding amendment to the Rules providing for deprivation of pension even after the pension had been sanctioned. “Though it could be stated that the government is waiving recovery, still reduction of pension is deprivation, and there can never be such deprivation except under the authority of law. There is no indication that Article 162 of the Constitution had been applied while passing the G.O.,” the court said.

The judges said the doctors had discharged their noble duty while in service. There was no complaint about lack of dedication during their period of service. They had retired in October, 2009. As on date, the youngest of them would be 76 years of age (taking 60 as the age of superannuation).

“They are thus a diminishing class. More than 50 of them had died. The family pension would only be 50% of the pension payable to a retired public servant. The financial commitment decreases on death,” they said.

Degradation of services

The judges held there cannot be a reduction of pension just to satiate the pleasure of Executive Officers deciding these issues. The plight of retired pensioners should be seen. “It is not a question of mere reduction of pension, but the hurt caused owing to degradation of the services rendered by them. Their services rendered to hundreds and thousands of patients should be recognised and should not be just washed away by citing other financial commitment by the government,” the judges said. They added, the government as a welfare State has a duty to recognise the loyal services rendered by a public servant. Deprivation of sanctioned pension could be resorted to only in the manner known to law.

“When the law does not authorise such deprivation, the government can never take away a part of the pension under the umbrella of a G.O, which has no statutory value. Though it is claimed to have been passed under Rule 56 of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules there are no corresponding amendments to the Rules. There is no claim that Article 162 of the Constitution had been applied by the government,” the court said and dismissed the appeals filed by the State.

Why MBBS seats under ‘freedom fighter’quota, 79 years after independence?

Why MBBS seats under ‘freedom fighter’quota, 79 years after independence? With Fake Certificates, An Adoption Claim & One Beneficiary Born In 2008, The Question Is No Longer JustWho Qualifies But How Long The Quota Can Continue | Vyapam Whistleblower Seeks A Six-Year Audit 

P.Naveen@timesofindia.com 10.10.2026 TOI BHOPAL

Bhopal: Seventy-nine years after Independence, Madhya Pradesh’s 3% freedom fighter quota for medical admissions is under scrutiny. Seven certificates were reportedly found fake during the 2025 MBBS/BDS counselling, and the admissions were cancelled. The admission rules provide for eligible sons, daughters, grandsons and granddaughters of recognised freedom fighters, subject to prescribed documentation. The freedom fighter must be registered in the Collectorate concerned, and the prescribed certificate has to be issued by the competent authority. The provisions available do not expressly extend the benefit to great-grandchildren or later generations. Yet one beneficiary’s date of birth is listed as 2008, 61 years after Independence. Age alone does not establish ineligibility or wrongdoing, but the case has brought the verification process under the scanner. 

Of the seven certificates found fake among candidates admitted in the first round of counselling, six were for MBBS and one for BDS. The category had 66 seats, of which 36 were allotted and 22 candidates took admission. Authorities also sought verification of other certificates after a suspicious document surfaced. The issue has also reached the criminal justice system. Shivpuri police registered an FIR on Dec 31, 2025, after a freedom fighter certificate submitted during the first round of NEETUG 2025-26 counselling came under scrutiny. 

The aspirant had sought admission under the category at Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Medical College, Shivpuri. The college sought verification from the Collector, Chhatarpur, and the FIR alleges that the certificate was fake. The case has been registered under sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. In another instance, a student has secured an MBBS seat by claiming his father had been ‘adopted’ by a freedom fighter. The certificate was reportedly verified by Gwalior authorities. However, the available provisions do not expressly clarify whether a candidate  can claim the benefit through an adopted parent or whether a biological relationship is required. 

The question is whether a legally valid adoption makes the candidate a grandson of the freedom fighter for the purposes of the quota. The courts have repeatedly stressed the need for documentary proof of both the freedom fighter’s status and the claimant’s relationship. In Krati vs State of Madhya Pradesh, MP high court had rejected a claim based on a grandfather after finding that the material produced did not establish the required Freedom Fighter status and that the prescribed Madhya Pradesh certification was not available. In Kushal Saxena vs State of Madhya Pradesh, the court had rejected a claim based on a grandfather registered as a freedom fighter in Uttar Pradesh, even though the candidate himself was a resident of MP. 

The cases show that residence, a claimed family relationship or a certificate from another authority cannot by themselves establish entitlement to the MP quota. The original freedom fighter record and the prescribed chain of relationship have to satisfy the applicable rules. 

Whistleblower seeks six-year audit: Vyapam whistleblower Dr Anand Rai has sought details of certificates and admissions for the past six years, saying the entire system needs to be examined. “How is this possible? Many more would come saying their fathers were adopted by freedom fighters. It’s a scam which needs investigation,” Rai said. He said govt should conduct a comprehensive audit instead of examining cases individually. He has sought district-wise information on freedom fighter certificates and medical admissions, including the candidates who used the certificates, the relationship claimed with the original freedom fighter, certificates rejected during verification, certificates later cancelled and cases referred to police. The data, he said, should be matched with original Collectorate registers, freedom fighter records and pension records. Such a comparison would establish whether the family relationship claimed at the time of admission existed in the original govt records or was added or established later. 

The audit could also show whether the adoption-based claim and the 2008 case are isolated instances or whether wider weaknesses exist in the verification system. Govt review: MP’s Director of Medical Education Dr Aruna Kumar said govt was considering the category. “The govt is thinking over the freedom fighters category. A  decision will be taken once the current admission season is over,” she said. Asked how these certificates are verified, she said, “We don’t do that; it’s up to the deans to verify it.” Why the age pattern calls for a probe: The numbers alone do not prove wrongdoing, but they raise questions that only a probe can answer, says Dr Anand Rai. A person who took part in the freedom movement by 1947 was most likely born between the 1900s and the 1920s. Their children would typically have been born between the 1930s and the 1960s, and their grandchildren between the 1960s and the 1990s. 

A candidate sitting NEET in 2025 is usually 17 to 25 years old, born roughly between 2000 and 2008. On this count, most such candidates would be great-grandchildren, a generation the rules do not expressly cover. A grandchild born around 2008 would require a freedom fighter born in the 1920s, whose child was born in the 1960s or later, and whose own child arrived in the mid-2000s. That chain is possible, but stretched. It cannot be settled by looking at a certificate alone. Only the original Collectorate registers, freedom fighter records, pension files and family documents can show whether each link in the chain existed in the govt’s own records or was added later. 

“That is why a probe is needed. It would establish whether the 2008 case is a rare exception, since late fatherhood, large age gaps and adoptions can all produce long generational gaps, or whether claims that look improbable on a generational count have been passing verification year after year. If the probe finds the chains hold, the system is cleared. If it finds gaps, the question of which eligible candidates lost seats follows,” asks Dr Rai.