Thursday, November 7, 2024

Student flooded with calls as his phone number appears in ‘Amaran’

Student flooded with calls as his phone number appears in ‘Amaran’



Wrong number: The callers wanted to have a word with Sai Pallavi or compliment her on her performance.

Vaageesan says the crumpled piece of paper that Sai Pallavi tosses at Sivakarthikeyan in a scene has a phone number resembling his own

S. Vijay Kumar

CHENNAI 7.11.2024 

Soon after the blockbuster movie Amaran, starring Sivakarthikeyan, hit the screens on Deepavali, Vaageesan V.V., a Chennai-based student, found himself flooded with unexpected calls. Strangely, he has no connection to the film or its cast.

It all started with a scene that hardly lasts a couple of seconds in the film. In it, actor Sai Pallavi tosses a crumpled piece of paper, with her phone number written on it, at Sivakarthikeyan.

Though not entirely legible, Mr. Vaageesan says it was his number that was shown on the screen. This touched off calls from strangers. The first few calls were enough for him to realise what was in store.

The callers wanted to have a word with Sai Pallavi or compliment her on her performance. Overwhelmed by the number of calls, Vaageesan put his phone on mute on the night of the festival.

“The next morning, I woke up to more than 100 missed calls and several voice messages from unknown numbers from across India and even abroad. The calls continued the following day. Some callers even believed that the number belonged to Indu Rebecca Varghese, the real-life wife of late Major Mukund Varadarajan, on whose life the film is based,” he says.


Saved on Truecaller

To make matters worse, someone had saved Vaageesan’s number as Vaageesan Indu Rebbbica VV on Truecaller, a caller identification application, further encouraging strangers to reach out to him. Unable to handle the increasing number of unknown calls and messages, he attempted to contact the film’s director, Rajkumar Periasamy, and protagonist Sivakarthikeyan by sending a message on social media, explaining that the phone number used in the movie was his.

“I haven’t received any response from them yet. Since the calls keep coming, I have to put my phone on silent mode. I am worried that I may miss an emergency call or an important message from my family members or friends. I have been using this number for two years. It is linked to my bank accounts, and I have given it to many of my contacts. I can’t afford to give it up,” he says.

Airtel’s response

For more than three days, Vaageesan has been declining calls from the numbers not on his contact list. “My number has even appeared in Instagram reels, reaching more people. I took up the matter with Airtel, my service provider, but they said it would not be possible to block incoming calls unless they were from a marketing source,” he said. Confirming that the issue was flagged by Vaageesan to customer care, a senior employee of the telecom company said the company was in the process of responding to the customer. When asked if there had been similar complaints from others, he said no other customer had highlighted any such problem. “If there is an abnormally large number of calls going to a particular number, the system will detect it and send an alert to the technical team. There is no such input as of now,” he said.

Incidentally, Vaageesan has not seen the film. His introduction to the heroic life of the Ashoka Chakra recipient came only through Instagram reels after the film was released and, of course, the unsolicited phone calls.

Wednesday, November 6, 2024

HC orders govt to appoint 292 auxiliary nurses

HC orders govt to appoint 292 auxiliary nurses 

TIMES NEWS NETWORK  6.11.2024 

Bhopal/Jabalpur : In a significant judgement, a division bench of MP high court ordered the state government to give appointments to 292 candidates on the post of ANM (Auxiliary Nurse Midwife) in the health department, who were denied posting at the time of verification of records for not fulfilling three conditions. The court said that if the order is not complied with, the commissioner, health, should personally appear in the court in the next hearing of the case. The order was issued by the HC bench on a petition filed by Rajnandini from Balaghat and 291 other candidates from across the state challenging their disqualification for the post of ANM on the pretext of not fulfilling three conditions – that they had not passed class 12th ex-am with biology, physics and chemistry as main subjects, had not received training as ANM in a govt hospital and duration of their training was not 2 years. 

According to the petitioners, according to 1989 rules it was not necessary for ANMs to have completed higher secondary with biology, chemistry and physics as compulsory subjects and the duration of training was 18 months. Similarly, a candidate could have received training in a private hospital as well, but the rules were changed in 2019 and the new conditions were inserted but by then, they had completed the ANM course. In 2023,when the vacancies of ANMs were advertised, they were not allowed to appear in the exam. They moved court challenging the decision not to allow them to appear in the exam. The court allowed them to appear in the exam and they cleared the exam but at the time of verification of documents, they were denied posting on the pretext that they don't fulfil the criteria for appointment as ANMS. 

The bench of chief justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Vivek Jain while allowing the petition ordered the state government to give them posting as ANMs and said if the order is not complied 



with, the commissioner, health, should be present in the court in the next hearing on Nov 20, 2024. Advocate Ishan Soni appeared in the case for the petitioners

HC: Clicking woman’s pic near her house not voyeurism

HC: Clicking woman’s pic near her house not voyeurism 

TIMES NEWS NETWORK 6.11.2024



Kochi : If a woman is in a public or private place where she would not typically expect privacy or protection from being seen or photographed, the offence of voyeurism is not applicable, the high court has held. Justice A Badharudeen made this ruling in response to a petition filed by two accused seeking to quash the charges against them for allegedly taking a photograph of a woman in front of her house and making gestures with sexual intent. 

According to the prosecution, the incident occurred in 2022 when the complainant was in front of her house, and the accused approached in a car, took photographs of her and the house, and, when confronted near the gate, made gestures with sexual implications. The police registered a case against the accused under sections 354C (voyeurism) and 509 (word, gesture, or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman) of the IPC. 

In considering the petition, the bench observed that the offence of voyeurism applies only when a woman is watched or photographed while engaged in a private act, under circumstances where she would usually expect not to be observed. Since the accused took the photograph while the complainant was in front of her house, the offence under section 354C IPC was not applicable, leading to its quashing. However, the bench noted that the accused’s actions could attract charges under Section 354A(1)(i) and (iv) (sexual harassment and punishment for sexual harassment) of the IPC.

NEWS TODAY 6.11.2024

 























NEWS TODAY 6.11.2024


























 

NEWS TODAY 21.12.2024