Dual seat allotments cause vacancies in PG med counselling

Dual seat allotments cause vacancies in PG med counselling 

TIMES NEWS NETWORK  30.11.2024

Chennai : At least 50 candidates in Tamil Nadu were allotted seats in both govt and management quotas after the first round of postgraduate medical counselling. Candidates can either accept one of the two seats or forgo both and apply for the next round. As a result, between 50 and 100 of these seats, besides others, are expected to remain vacant at the end of the first round. Officials have indicated that this trend of dual postings and subsequent vacancies may continue in the upcoming rounds of counselling this year. 

This year, the state selection committee relied on an error-riddled merit list prepared by the National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBE). Some students with lower scores were ranked higher, causing confusion. “The rank distribution in the govt quota differs from that in the management quota for nonservice candidates. This discrepancy is understandable for service candidates since they receive added incentive marks to their scores,” said Student Counsellor Manickavel Arumugam. 

For instance, a non-service candidate placed five ranks below another student in the state quota rank list was placed five ranks above the same student in the management quota list. To resolve inconsistencies between the state and manage ment lists, the selection committee conducted parallel counselling for both categories. It also issued a disclaimer and encouraged students to contact the national board for any clarifications regarding the merit list. “The fundamental purpose of an entrance test is to determine which candidate is superior. This test has failed to achieve that objective. It is worse for the state to wash its hands off the responsibility," Arumugam said. 

For the first time, the national board conducted NEET-PG in two batches on Aug 11 and declared results on August 23. The results came in percentiles instead of individual scores. This made it difficult for nearly a dozen states, including Tamil Nadu, which offer additional marks as incentives to in-service candidates. Tamil Nadu wrote to NBE seeking normalised marks so it could add incentive marks for counselling. This request was denied by the NBE. After discussions with the National Medical Commission, the apex body regulating medical education in the state, and the national board, it was decided that NBE would release the merit list using incentive marks given by states. At least two high courts – Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan – have already stayed the counselling following petitions of irregularities in rank lists. “We are hoping the state will do something here too,” said a candidate.