Friday, August 28, 2020
[Breaking] NEET-JEE : Cabinet Ministers From 6 States File Review In SC Against Dismissal Of Pleas To Postpone Exams
வீட்டு கடன் வாங்கியவர் வங்கி முன் தீக்குளிப்பு
சான்றிதழ்களை மறுபதிவு செய்யச் சொல்வது எதற்கு? டாக்டர்கள் கொந்தளிப்பு
முழு ஊரடங்கு ரத்தாகுமா? முதல்வர் நாளை முடிவு!
Updated : ஆக 28, 2020 02:24 | Added : ஆக 27, 2020 23:32
நீலகிரிக்கு 'இ - பாஸ்' எளிதில் கிடைக்காது
15k ‘ghost beneficiaries’ of PM-KISAN scheme in UP
Bank fined for not providing AC facility
Move to retain e-pass is well thought out: CM
Justice Lakshmanan, ex-judge of SC & prolific writer, dead at 78
City couple loses ₹4L, gets ₹55L in fake notes as loan
Thursday, August 27, 2020
[Breaking] Students vs UGC : SC To Pronounce Judgment Tomorrow On Pleas Against Final Semester Exams
[Breaking] Students vs UGC : SC To Pronounce Judgment Tomorrow On Pleas Against Final Semester Exams
27
Aug 2020 7:03 PM
|
|
The Supreme
Court will pronounce verdict tomorrow in a batch of petitions which challenged
the direction issued by the University Grants Commission (UGC) on July 6 to
hold final semester examinations by September 30.
A bench
comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, R Subhash Reddy and M R Shah had reserved
the judgment on August 18, after elaborately hearing various parties in the
case.
The main
arguments from the students' side are :
Compelling students
to appear for physical exams when the COVID-19 pandemic is intensifying exposes
them to serious health risks, affecting their right to life.
The uniform
direction issued by the UGC without taking into account local situations will
put several students to grave prejudice, as several areas are containment zones
and local lockdown is in prevalence in many regions.
The
pandemic and the lockdown have disrupted the classes, and conducting exams
without requisite number of classess is arbitrary and unreasonable.
There are
many students of final semester who have either cleared job interviews or
secured admission for higher courses. So granting them degree certificates at
the earliest based on past performance is the best course available to protect
the future of the students.
The option
of online exams is also not viable given the stark digital divide, and the lack
of uniform access to the internet across the spectrum.
Examination
is not the only mode of evaluation. UGC follows the concept of 'continuous
evaluation' of the student from day 1. Hence, internal assessments and
performance of past semesters can be reckoned to award final degrees.
The UGC
stated that the direction was issued in the best interests of the students. The
Ministry of Home Affairs told the Court that it has given an exemption for
opening educational institutions for the purpose of conducting exams.
Disaster
Management Act vs UGC Act
The case
also threw up the issue of conflict between Disaster Managment Act and the UGC
Act. This was in the context of the State of Maharashtra acting on the decision
of the State Disaster Management Authority to direct the cancellation of final
term exams. Hence, an issue arose in the case as to whose directions will
prevail - whether that of the SDMA or the UGC.
The UGC
maintained that in matters related to higher education, it remains the final
word and the SDMA cannot interfere in that domain. On the other hand, the State
of Maharashtra submitted that in the backdrop of COVID-19 pandemic, which has
been notified as a 'disaster' within the meaning of the DMA, the State Disaster
Management Authority posseses vast powers to take appropriate decisions to deal
with the situation to protect the lives of people.
State
Autonomy
Another
crucial issue in the case was whether State Governments possess autonomy in the
matter. The Governments of the National Capital Territoriy of Delhi, West
Bengal, Odisha, Maharashtra etc, have issued directions to cancel final term
exams. Therefore, the question was whether UGC can override the State
Governments in that regard.
It was
argued by the State Governments that the UGC has only the power to lay down
standards or education and cannot issue peremptory directions to universities.
It was further argued that the UGC can only lay down guidelines, that too after
consulting the Universities as per Section 12 of the UGC Act. The States
contended that the UGC took the decision without consulting them and without
taking account of the local situations.
Senior
Advocates Dr AM Singhvi (for petitioner Yash Dubey), Syam Divan(for petitioner
Yuva Sena), Arvind P Datar (for Maharashtra), K V Vishwanathan (for Delhi),
Jaideep Gupta (for West Bengal), Advocate Alakh Alok Srivastava(for
petitioners), Solicitor General Tushar Mehta (for UGC) etc made arguments in
the case.
Reports
about various submissions in the hearing may be read below :
Breaking] UGC final year exams: Supreme Court to pronounce its judgment tomorrow in petitions seeking cancellation of exams
[Breaking] Students vs UGC : SC To Pronounce Judgment Tomorrow On Pleas Against Final Semester Exams
2 IGMC students suspended for ragging, abuse
TIMES NEWS NETWORK
Shimla: 27.08.2020
The police have registered a case against two students of the Indira Gandhi Medical College (IGMC), Shimla for allegedly ragging a third-year MBBS student. The accused senior students were also suspended after a decision to this effect was taken at a meeting of the Anti-Ragging Committee of the medical college on Wednesday.
In his complaint to the police, the third-year student has alleged that the two seniors in inebriated condition manhandled him near the hostel gate and the entire incident was recorded in the CCTV cameras installed there. The complainant also accused his seniors of ragging him.
Sources said that the CCTV footage shows two groups of students clashing with each other during the night hours. The Anti-Ragging Committee has submitted its report to the Shimla police, who are investigating the matter.
Shimla SP Mohit Chawla said based on the student’s complaint, a case under sections 323 (causing hurt on provocation) and 34 (acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention) of the IPC and Section 3 of the Himachal Pradesh Education Institutions Prohibition of Ragging Act has been registered at the Sadar police station.
He said the police are investigating the matter and a report has been sought from the principal of the college. As of now, a prima facie FIR has been registered on the complaint of the aggrieved MBBS student and his medical examination has been conducted.
IGMC principal Dr Rajnish Pathania said both senior students, against whom allegations have been made, have been suspended from the medical college. He said the action came on the basis of the report submitted by the Anti-Ragging Committee.
Covid patient stopped from boarding flight
Masks for Covid may end up eliminating TB by 2025 target
No passes needed to enter Noida from Delhi
NEET test centres doubled, frisking of students banned JEE (Main) From Sept 1 To Sept 6
Medical, paramedical students can pay fees in 4 instalments
Delaying entrance tests indefinitely will further disadvantage the batch of 2020
7 oppn CMs want NEET, JEE put off, will seek SC rethink
JEE aspirants wonder how to reach, how safe will it be Covid, Curbs, Floods & Lack Of Transport Worry Students
Don’t postpone JEE & NEET, say parents
Good news on vaccine by early 2021, says WHO chief scientist
Recruitment of staff in varsities on hold
Institutional quarantine for int’l travellers returning to UP waived, but with riders
‘Postpone or find another way to hold JEE, NEET’
-
கொலுசு அணிந்த சரஸ்வதி * நாகப்பட்டினம் மாவட்டம் கடலங்குடியில் உள்ள சிவன் கோவிலில் வளையல், கொலுசு அணிந்தபடி சரஸ்வதிதேவி காட்சியளிக்கிறாள். ச...
-
கட்சியிலிருந்து நேற்றே ஒதுங்கிவிட்டேன்! டி.டி.வி.தினகரன் தடாலடி பேட்டி vikatan news ராகினி ஆத்ம வெண்டி மு. படம்: ஸ்ரீநிவாசலு 'அ.த...