Sunday, November 26, 2017

ரூ.312-க்கு விமானப் பயணம்: கோ ஏர் அறிவிப்பு

Published : 24 Nov 2017 18:31 IST

பிடிஐ
 


கோ ஏர் விமான நிறுவனம் ரூ.312-க்கு சென்னை, பெங்களூரு, கொச்சி உள்ளிட்ட 7 நகரங்களுக்கு ஒரு வழி விமானப் பயணத்தை அறிவித்துள்ளது.

2017-ம் ஆண்டு டிசம்பர் மாதம் 1-ம் தேதியிலிருந்து 2018-ம் ஆண்டு அக்டோபர் மாதம் 18-ம் தேதி வரை பயணம் செய்ய விரும்புபவர்களுக்கு கோ ஏர் நிறுவனம் இச்சலுகையை வழங்கியுள்ளது.


விமானப் பயணத்திற்கான துவக்க டிக்கெட்டின் விலை ரூ.312. இன்று (நவம்பர் 24) முதல் இந்த மாதம் 29-ம் தேதி வரை இதற்கான முன்பதிவு நடைபெறுகிறது.

குறிப்பிட்ட இருக்கைகள் மட்டுமே சலுகை விலையில் வழங்கப்படும் என்று கோ ஏர் நிறுவனம் தெரிவித்துள்ளது. மேலும் முதலில் வருவோர்க்கு முன்னுரிமை என்ற அடிப்படையில் டிக்கெட் விற்பனை நடைபெறும் என்றும் கோ ஏர் தெரிவித்துள்ளது.

இந்த சலுகைக் கட்டணத்தில் வரிகள் எதுவும் அடங்காது. இந்த சலுகையில் சென்னை, பெங்களூரு, டெல்லி, கொச்சி, ஹைதராபாத், அகமதாபாத் மற்றும் லக்னோ ஆகிய நகரங்களுக்கு மட்டுமே பயணிக்க முடியும்.
Tamil Nadu school girls suicide: ‘We were shivering and crying as teachers shouted at us, called us names’
The 11 girls were allegedly threatened with dismissal from school unless they brought their parents along the next day. On Friday, four of them killed themselves by jumping into a well in the village, about a kilometre away from the school.

Written by Arun Janardhanan | Chennai | Updated: November 26, 2017 7:34 am




 Four schoolgirls jumped into the well on Friday

By Thursday evening, the 11 students of Class 11B at the Government Girls Higher Secondary School at Panapakkam, a village near Vellore, were exhausted. “I just got up and went home at 5.30 pm after the special class. But I decided I wouldn’t tell my parents about what had happened to us in school,” says one of them.

The 11 girls were allegedly threatened with dismissal from school unless they brought their parents along the next day. On Friday, four of them killed themselves by jumping into a well in the village, about a kilometre away from the school.

On Saturday, as half a dozen students of 11B stood waiting for ambulances from Vellore General Hospital to bring home the bodies of the four girls after their postmortem procedure, the girls shared stories of that harrowing day at school that had left many of them insulted and intimidated.

“Our Tamil teacher was giving out answer sheets of the quarterly exam. My friend Sankari got only half a mark for a two-mark question. She called me from the backbench, where she was sitting, and asked me how much I had got. I said I got full marks for that question. The teacher caught us whispering, got angry and shouted at us. Sankari told the teacher that we were only asking each other’s marks. She called us names, said she would report us to the headmistress and left the room. After that, we went home for lunch and when we came back, the entire class was asked to assemble at the ground,” said the girl.

Sankari’s body was among those fished out from the well on Friday.

The girls told The Sunday Express that the special assembly turned out to be a public trial, where headmistress Rama Mani and the other teachers allegedly picked on students, scolded them and threatened them with action for their “bad behaviour” – talking in the classroom, talking back and being disrespectful to teachers.

“They said we were worse than ‘Mumbai dons’. Another teacher blamed our behaviour on our parents lack of education. We were all shivering and crying as the headmistress threatened to issue us transfer certificates,” said one of the students, talking through her tears. She was among the 11 whom the teachers had singled out.

The girls said the entire class stood in the school ground between 2 pm and 4.30 pm. “The teachers even gave us our botany answersheets while we there. I had got 17, full marks. But the teacher shouted at me too, saying full marks were of no use if I wasn’t disciplined. They told us to continue standing there, both hands raised, our botany sheets in one hand,” she says.

Later, they were made to sit, after which the teachers allegedly singled out 11 students and said they were the worst of the lot. “Every time we tried to explain, they got angrier and hurled insults at us,” says one of the girls.

She says Sankari, Revathi, Manisha and Deepa — the four who committed suicide — were among those who cried throughout this ‘trial’. At 4.30 pm, as the other students left, as punishment, the 11 were sent back to their classes for a special class of one hour.

“We were told to bring our parents the next day. Sankari was scared as her father was very short-tempered. Revathi parents are daily-wage labourers in Chennai and she stayed with her grandmother. We were all scared about how our parents would react,” she said.

“We were all upset that we had been scolded and called names – naai (dog), erumai (buffalo) and so on. Before we left for home, Sankari, who was the most upset, took down all our signatures on a sheet of paper. We didn’t know why she did that. I don’t think she knew either because she tore the paper soon after. Then, she told us to reach school at 8 am on Friday,” says another girl, adding that most of them didn’t tell their parents about the incidents at school. “Even if we had brought our parents, the teachers would have insulted them in front of everyone.”

One of the girls, who was not in school on Thursday, says that on Friday, when she walked into the classroom, “everybody was talking about how Manisha and Sankari were missing, that they had left their bags on the desk”.

By 10 am, news of the missing students reached the headmistress and she summoned some of the students, among them Sankari’s relative in Class 12. “Where are those dogs,” the headmistress allegedly shouted at her. “I told the headmistress what I knew. On Friday, when I reached the school at 8.10 am, I saw Sankari and Manisha cycling out through the gates. They looked sad. I told them to wait till I had parked my cycle inside, but they simply said ‘bye’ and left. The headmistress asked me to take Sankari’s bag to her parents and inform them that she was missing,” the girl says.

By noon, a senior official from the education department reached the school. Sankari’s “best friend” says, “The official asked me about Sankari, if she had boyfriends.”

Meanwhile, some of the students and the families of the missing girls began looking for them. Two of the girls said they were with Manisha’s parents when, at Samathvapuram Anna Nagar village, less than 2 km from the school, they spotted the girls’ bicycles near a well. “We spotted chappals too. When we looked inside the well, we saw one set of chappals floating,” said a student, breaking down.

At their home, Saraswathy, aunt of Revathy, one of the girls who died, is inconsolable, “Her parents are in Chennai and I was taking care of her and her grandmother. What will I tell her parents now?” Nearby, Revathi’s 9-year-old brother is busy preparing for his sister’s funeral.

About 500 metres away, the loud wails at Deepa’s house rise about the din of the powerlooms. Deepa’s cousin Kavitha says Deepa always rode her bicycle to school, with Revathy riding pillion.

“Sankari’s mother is a farm labourer. She usually leaves home at 6 am and comes back at 6.30 pm. Since she has no phone, she didn’t know of the incident until she came home. But by then, they had taken Sankari’s body for the post-mortem procedure and the mother is still waiting,” says Sankari’s neighbour Susheela.

Repeated calls to headmistress Rama Rani went unanswered.

Pradeep Yadav, Principal Secretary, School Education Department, says two teachers, including the headmistress, have been suspended. “I am waiting for a detailed probe report. The teachers found guilty will face severe action,” he said.

Vellore SP P Pakalavan said, “Our probe is on. There have been no arrests so far. It is a case of suicide.”
Pay up or return land to owner, encroacher told in Kancheepuram

By Express News Service | Published: 26th November 2017 07:42 AM |



CHENNAI: A lower court in Kancheepuram has directed an encroacher to pay the land cost for the private land in Pillaipakkam, Sriperumbudur taluk, on which he had encroached, within two months or return the land after demolishing the superstructure. The encroacher had let out the land to the Department of AYUSH attached to the Union Ministry of Health & Family Welfare and managed to dodge the land-owner for four years

G Karunanidhi, judge, district court-II in Kancheepuram, gave the directive while passing orders on an original side application from Hugo John Gozmao (74) of Kollam in Kerala. According to the applicant, he had purchased the property from one Dhanapal and four others and got it registered in the Sub-Registrar’s office in Sriperumbudur in March, 1996.

However, Dr V Dharmalingam of Adyar took advantage of Gozmao’s absence as he resided in Kerala and encroached upon 6,540 square feet of the property, constructed a pucca building and let it out to the department of AYUSH in 2013.

When Gozmao visited his property and confronted Dharmalingam on this count, the latter allegedly brushed off the entire incident and said that the land was required for his convenience and enjoyment. Dharmalingam had also said he wanted to buy the land at the prevailing market value.

Left with no other option, Gozmao agreed to sell the occupied portion for Rs 35.97 lakh. He entered into an agreement with Dharmalingam, which said that he would be paid an advance amount of Rs 50,000 and the balance cleared within two months. However, Dharmalingam failed to honour the deal. Hence, Gozmao issued a legal notice to him.

However, Gozmao was forced to enter into another agreement in January 2015, which said Dharmalingam had remitted Rs 15 lakh and assured to pay the balance in two months. Again, Dharmalingam did not honour this assurance and Gozmao moved the district court.

On November 7, feeling satisfied that the land did, indeed, belong to Gozmao and that Dharmalingam had encroached upon it, the district judge directed the latter to pay the balance amount of Rs 20.97 lakh within two months, failing which he would have to restore the land to its original condition after demolishing the superstructure.

Retd bank staff gets relief as probe restrained in certificate validity case

By Express News Service  |   Published: 26th November 2017 07:43 AM  |  

CHENNAI: Coming to the rescue of a retired bank employee, the Madras High Court has restrained DSP, SC/ST Vigilance Cell, from holding an enquiry to ascertain the genuineness of the community certificate produced by him, five years after retirement.

A division bench of Justices C T Selvam and M V Muralidharan granted the injunction while passing interim orders on a petition from A Jayaraman of Sundapalayam in Coimbatore on November 23 last. The bench also issued notice to the authorities concerned, returnable in two weeks.

According to advocate Yogesh Kannadasan, Jayaraman was appointed as a probationary officer in State Bank of India under ST quota in 1980. He retired as manager of Ambattur Industrial Estate branch in February 2012 and the retirement benefits were settled. He was drawing pension. During service, his employer, by a circular dated January 13, 1998, had called upon various ST employees to produce another community certificate authenticated by the respective District Collectors. The ST Employees Welfare Association moved the Madras High Court, which in July 2005 had quashed the circular.

While so, by a letter dated May 23 last, the DSP, SC/ST Vigilance Cell, informed Jayaraman to appear before the cell on June 9 last. By a letter dated June 10, the petitioner asked for a copy of a communication dated February 14, 2017, based on which the letter was issued, to defend his case effectively. However, the DSP, without acceding the request, told him to appear before him on June 12.

Yogesh wondered under what authority the enquiry was to be commenced, in the absence of any adverse material to show to the contrary. It could not be done so after a lapse of five years from the date of his retirement, that too after the High Court quashing a similar circular, Yogesh contended and sought to quash the June 9 communication.

Waste don’t lie Segregated at home, mixed later

By S Shivakumar | Express News Service | Published: 26th November 2017 02:07 AM |

The two-dustbin system introduced in some areas hasn’t taken off yet, and the blame doesn’t lie with households alone. Conservancy workers and transfer stations have been callously combining degradable & non-biodegradable trash, contributing to poor waste management

CHENNAI: Twenty three-year-old Amarnath carefully takes out wet waste in a black garbage bag every morning except on Wednesdays. “Wednesdays are for the non-biodegradable waste,” he says. He is one of the few residents in Tambaram who have changed the way they dispose solid waste from their homes since the new source segregation system was rolled out a few months back.

“It is a good system and this is the least I can do. Hopefully, it will ensure better solid waste management,” he says. But little does he know that his ‘civic drop’ will not inspire an ‘ocean of change’. At least not if the current system of solid waste management system continues in the municipalities of the southern suburbs.



Amarnath’s segregated waste is mixed with the unsegregated waste of his neighbours during door-to-door collections and further mixed at the transfer stations. The waste from five municipalities — Tambaram, Pallavaram, Sembakkam, Anakaputhur and Pammal — finally end up in the Vengadamangalam waste-to-energy plant, where it is segregated, treated and then sent to the landfill in the 50-acre compound.

After door-to-door collections, solid waste from the Tambaram and Sembakkam municipalities are sent to the Kannadapalayam transfer station while the waste from Pallavaram, Pammal and Anakaputhur municipalities are sent to the Ganapathipuram transfer station.
Every day, around 280 metric tonnes of unsegregated solid waste is compacted in these transfer stations before being sent to the Vengadamangalam waste-to-energy plant operated by the Essel group.

No change

“There has been no change at all after the source segregation campaign was launched,” says a conservancy worker at the Kannadapalayam transfer station. While this is seemingly undebatable, he also says that though the practice of segregating waste at source is burgeoning in some places, it won’t result in a big change if the present system of waste management continues.

Why are the municipalities so complacent about source segregation? Because the waste management machines in the Vengadamangalam plant can process mixed waste. Since the plant was established before the new solid waste management rules came out in 2016, it is designed to handle mixed domestic waste. This, however, does not mean the plant cannot handle segregated waste and in fact the plant manager, Manikandan, claims segregated waste can pave way for “a more efficient management of solid waste” and reduce the amount of non-recyclable waste which goes to the landfill by 15-20%.

Currently, the Vengadamangalam waste-to-energy plant, which became operational in 2013, has a daily capacity of 300 metric tonnes and the daily waste output of the five municipalities has already reached 280 metric tonnes. When Express visited the Vengadamangalam plant, a worker said “it is a good time to start decentralising compost operations to reduce the amount of waste which reaches the plant”. But that will be possible only if the waste is source-segregated and kept segregated by the municipalities before it reaches the Vengadamangalam plant, which is expected to start generating power from waste by early 2019.

“The unsegregated waste is ground at the plant and is filtered using a hopper. It is then segregated into biodegradable and non-biodegradable waste. The biodegradable waste is taken for composting while the non-biodegradable part is treated to produce refuse derived fuel (RDF), which will fuel power generators once the mechanisms are in place,” said Balaji, a supervisor at the Vengadamangalam plant.
He told Express that segregation after grinding is not comprehensive and leaves traces of non-biodegradable waste in the compost while also increasing non-recyclable waste that reaches the landfill.

Alarming numbers

Academics also believe the two-dustbin system can work wonders. Kurien Joseph, a professor at the Centre For Environmental Studies, Anna University, deems the two-dustbin system essential. “Around 80 per cent of the waste generated can be either composted or recycled,” he says. “With public cooperation, waste which reaches landfills every day can be brought down by one-fifth.”

The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, when it released the new rules for solid waste management in 2016, estimated that the solid waste production in the country will increase from 62 million tonnes annually to 162 million tonnes by 2031 and that if the cities continue disposing the waste like they have, 1240 hectares of land will be have to be converted into landfills to accommodate the waste generated.

The source segregation system introduced by the Chennai Corporation in October yet to pick up but decentralised compost pits in each zone will ensure that only waste which can’t be recycled will reach the landfills in Perungudi and Kodungaiyur, thereby drastically reducing the influx in the long run.
Town panchayats included

The town panchayats in the outskirts of the city are also planning to emulate the corporation’s model at the Keerapakkam solid waste management facility.

“Eight town panchayats have been allocated land for disposal of solid waste in Keerapakkam. As the facility is being readied, we are scouting for compost pits in each panchayat to ensure only the waste which can’t be recycled or composted will come to Keerapakkam,” said Malaiaman Thirumudikari, joint director (schemes), Directorate of Town Panchayats.

The sanitary officer of the Pallavaram Municipality, Selvaraj, when contacted by Express said he greatly advocates the two dustbin system. “Segregation of solid waste is a key concern the municipality is addressing with our door-to-door campaigns,” he said. He however remained silent when the futility of the exercise was pointed out as the municipality mixes even the segregated waste at the transfer stations.
Albert, the sanitary inspector at the Tambaram Municipality, gave a similar response. The nodal officer of the Vengadamangalam plant, Shivakumar and the commissioner of the Pallavaram Municipality were unavailable for comment.

While the corporation and the town panchayats surrounding Chennai have restructured their solid waste management methods to comply with the 2016 rules for solid waste management, the municipalities are continuing with a system that sends 15-20 percent of total volume of solid waste generated to landfills.
The concession period of 20 years for Essel at the Vengadamangalam plant continues upto 2033. If the municipalities keep discouraging its citizens to adopt the two-dustbin system, by indiscriminately mixing the waste collected, the landfill in Vengadamangalam will soon not be enough to contain the solid waste generated in the suburbs.

Recycle, reduce, reuse

There is no doubt that reducing waste is vital for environmental conservation. Experts say countries like India with several large cities should get their act together fast

Source-segregation is the only long-term solution to reduce amount of waste that reaches landfills
Landfills release leachate, which contaminate groundwater. It can also release dangerous gases, and are a breeding ground for vectors such as rats and flies
A report estimated that the solid waste production in the country will increase from 62 million tonnes annually to 162 million tonnes by 2031

300 Daily capacity (in metric tonnes) of the Vengadamangalam waste-to-energy plant, which became operational in 2013. Daily waste output of just five municipalities in Chennai has already reached 280 metric tonnes

Want marriage registration in Chennai? Can’t do without parents’ nod


By Sushmitha Ramakrishnan | Express News Service

| Published: 25th November 2017 02:33 AM |

 

CHENNAI: Want to get your marriage registered? It’s not just your spouse’s consent that matters. Registration offices in Chennai and neighbouring districts are demanding consent letters from the groom’s parents. What is more weird, they don’t insist on such a document from the bride’s side, as a Chennai couple recently found out.

Sandya Raj* (25), of Chennai decided to get her marriage registered earlier this week. Sandya, parents, husband Rohan* (29) and his parents went to Thiruporur registration office with documents mandated under TN Registration of Marriages Act 2009.

Upon arrival, the officials asked her to produce a consent letter from the groom’s dad. “They also claimed my father-in-law’s letter had to be notarised, else the marriage would not be registered,” she said.
When Express did some fact checking, all officials unanimously agreed they seek such letters. One official in a registration office in Kancheepuram claimed she actually sought consent letters from parents on both sides to prevent “illegal” weddings.

The official said she started insisting on the letter ever since the “Supreme Court passed some order in this regard”. If the couple fails to produce the letter, she would hold an inquiry and talk to the parents. “It is up to the parents to stop the wedding. If they don’t get back, we do the registration.”

The official of Thiruporur town panchayat, who did not want to be identified, admitted he had asked for the letter and justified it, claiming he was acting on a “circular issued by the office of Inspector General of Registration a couple of months ago”.

But Inspector General of Registrations J Kumaragurubaran denied the existence of any such circular and said the last one sent by his office was on January 14, 2016.

“Registration officials cannot insist on parent’s consent. We will warn them if they force couples for it,” he said. He, however, added that the registrar has the right to refuse to register the marriage if he or she finds the documents suspicious.

Vaikunt Ramesh*, in his mid-twenties, and his girlfriend decided to get married last year, but did not want to inform their parents. The couple, along with their friends visited the registration office in Nungambakkam where they too were asked to produce the consent letter. However, he said he got around the problem by paying a few thousand rupees as bribe.

“We wanted to get done with the wedding without drawing too much attention. We were scared that they might go to the police, which is why we decided to pay the speed money,” he said alleging that the officials at the registration office deliberately make the procedure cumbersome till you are frustrated and don’t mind having a lighter wallet so as to celebrate the union in peace.
(*Names changed to protect identity)

Can't help a man sleeping over his rights for 50 years: Supreme Court 

DH News Service, New Delhi, Nov 25 2017, 23:36 IST



The Supreme Court, DH file photo

The Supreme Court has confirmed the Karnataka High Court's view that the court cannot come to aid of a man who sleeps over his rights for 50 years.

The top court dismissed a plea of a man seeking denotification of land in Bagalkot district that was acquired more than 50 years ago but was not used for the intended purpose.

A bench of Justices Arun Mishra and Mohan M Shantanagoudar found no ground to interfere with the Karnataka High Court's judgement of November 22, 2016, dismissing a writ appeal filed by Sangappa.

The petitioner's adopted father owned five acres and three guntas of land in Bagalkot district. In 1959, the said land was acquired by the state government for laying railway siding and water pipe for Kanoria Cement Industry Ltd. He had claimed that the land was not put to use for the purpose it was acquired.

The HC rejected his contention saying that there was a possibility that the land was used for the intended purpose till 1970. The HC also said, "It is trite to state that a litigant who sleeps over his rights for 50 long years cannot expect the court to rush to his rescue, and to unsettle the position concretised in 1959."

NEWS TODAY 07.07.2026