Quota bill challenged in Supreme Court, day after passage
. Updated: 11 Jan 2019, 01:36 AM IST Priyanka Mittal
The petition challenging the quota bill in Supreme Court says the 124th amendment violates several basic features of the Constitution, including the equality code
mint-india-wire quota bill supreme courtquota bill supreme court petition quota bill detailsgeneral category reservationupper caste reservation10% general category reservation124th AmendmentConstitution of India
New Delhi: A constitution amendment bill granting 10% reservation for economically weaker sections of the general category was challenged in the Supreme Court on Thursday, a day after Parliament approved the draft law.
The petition challenging the quota bill was filed by Youth for Equality, an organization opposing caste-based reservations. Its president, Kaushal Kant Mishra, claimed that the amendment violates several basic features of the Constitution.
The amendment, which introduced Articles 15(6) and 16(6) into the Constitution, violates the equality code of the Constitution and was in “breach of the basic structure of the Constitution", he added.
The petition also raised questions on the use of the expression “economically weaker sections" as this remains undefined under the amendment. This is left to be notified by the states, which is “arbitrary and unworkable", said the petitioners.
The petition relied on the 1992 Supreme Court judgement in the Indira Sawhney vs Union of India case, where a Constitution bench had specifically stated that economic criteria cannot be the sole basis for reservations under the Constitution. Other cases upholding the 50% limit on quota such as the 2006 judgement in the M. Nagaraj vs Union of India case and the 2018 verdict in the Jarnail Singh vs Lachhmi Narain Gupta case were also cited by the petitioners.
“The impugned amendment fails to consider that Articles 14 (equality before law) and 16 (equality of opportunity in public employment) form the basic feature of equality, and that they have been violated with the doing away of the restraints that were imposed on the reservation policy, i.e. the 50% ceiling limit and the exclusion of economic status as a sole criterion," the plea added.
On Wednesday, the Rajya Sabha passed the Constitution (124th Amendment) Bill, 2019, with the opposition divided over its stance on the legislation. The quota bill was passed in the Rajya Sabha by 165 votes, more than two-thirds the majority of the House. Seven members voted against it.
The Lok Sabha had passed the bill on Tuesday. The bill will become law after the President’s assent, which is expected soon.
The passage of the bill, with all major opposition parties supporting it, is significant as it comes ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections due by May. The immediate trigger for the bill was the backlash faced by the Bharatiya Janata Party from upper castes in the recently concluded assembly elections in Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Rajasthan which it lost in a direct contest with Congress.
The 124th Amendment Bill provides for 10% reservation to economically weaker sections in the general category, especially upper castes.
“Weaker section beneficiaries" include people earning less than ₹ 8 lakh annually; owning less than five hectares of agricultural land, residential property of less than 1,000 sq. ft and a residential plot less than 109 square yards in a notified municipality, or 209 square yards in a non-notified municipality.
. Updated: 11 Jan 2019, 01:36 AM IST Priyanka Mittal
The petition challenging the quota bill in Supreme Court says the 124th amendment violates several basic features of the Constitution, including the equality code
mint-india-wire quota bill supreme courtquota bill supreme court petition quota bill detailsgeneral category reservationupper caste reservation10% general category reservation124th AmendmentConstitution of India
New Delhi: A constitution amendment bill granting 10% reservation for economically weaker sections of the general category was challenged in the Supreme Court on Thursday, a day after Parliament approved the draft law.
The petition challenging the quota bill was filed by Youth for Equality, an organization opposing caste-based reservations. Its president, Kaushal Kant Mishra, claimed that the amendment violates several basic features of the Constitution.
The amendment, which introduced Articles 15(6) and 16(6) into the Constitution, violates the equality code of the Constitution and was in “breach of the basic structure of the Constitution", he added.
The petition also raised questions on the use of the expression “economically weaker sections" as this remains undefined under the amendment. This is left to be notified by the states, which is “arbitrary and unworkable", said the petitioners.
The petition relied on the 1992 Supreme Court judgement in the Indira Sawhney vs Union of India case, where a Constitution bench had specifically stated that economic criteria cannot be the sole basis for reservations under the Constitution. Other cases upholding the 50% limit on quota such as the 2006 judgement in the M. Nagaraj vs Union of India case and the 2018 verdict in the Jarnail Singh vs Lachhmi Narain Gupta case were also cited by the petitioners.
“The impugned amendment fails to consider that Articles 14 (equality before law) and 16 (equality of opportunity in public employment) form the basic feature of equality, and that they have been violated with the doing away of the restraints that were imposed on the reservation policy, i.e. the 50% ceiling limit and the exclusion of economic status as a sole criterion," the plea added.
On Wednesday, the Rajya Sabha passed the Constitution (124th Amendment) Bill, 2019, with the opposition divided over its stance on the legislation. The quota bill was passed in the Rajya Sabha by 165 votes, more than two-thirds the majority of the House. Seven members voted against it.
The Lok Sabha had passed the bill on Tuesday. The bill will become law after the President’s assent, which is expected soon.
The passage of the bill, with all major opposition parties supporting it, is significant as it comes ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections due by May. The immediate trigger for the bill was the backlash faced by the Bharatiya Janata Party from upper castes in the recently concluded assembly elections in Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Rajasthan which it lost in a direct contest with Congress.
The 124th Amendment Bill provides for 10% reservation to economically weaker sections in the general category, especially upper castes.
“Weaker section beneficiaries" include people earning less than ₹ 8 lakh annually; owning less than five hectares of agricultural land, residential property of less than 1,000 sq. ft and a residential plot less than 109 square yards in a notified municipality, or 209 square yards in a non-notified municipality.
No comments:
Post a Comment