SC slams govt. for denying pension to freedom fighter
Centre had filed repeated appeals against HC order
26/08/2019, KRISHNADAS RAJAGOPAL,NEW DELHI
Centre had filed repeated appeals against HC order
26/08/2019, KRISHNADAS RAJAGOPAL,NEW DELHI
The SC ordered the government to deposit ₹10,000 in the Advocates’ Welfare Fund within two weeks.
The Supreme Court has slammed the Centre for harassing a 90-year-old freedom fighter by filing repeated appeals in higher courts, often at the last minute, to deny him a freedom fighter’s pension.
The government had challenged a Delhi High Court order directing the Centre to pay Dev Narayan Mishra his freedom fighter pension. The High Court attempted to make the government realise that the objective of the pension under the Swatantra Sainik Samman Pension Scheme of 1972 is not to “reward” patriotic men and women who threw their lives into the Freedom Movement, but to honour them and mitigate their suffering.
“The scheme was introduced with the object of providing pension to freedom fighters and families of martyrs,” the High Court had explained to the government in its October 2018 order.
Both the single Judge and Division Bench of the Delhi High Court consistently recognised Mr. Mishra's claim for freedom fighter pension from 2015 onwards.
The High Court said the “standard of proof required in such cases (of freedom fighters) is not as required in criminal cases and once on the basis of evidence it is probable that the respondent (Mishra) had suffered imprisonment during freedom struggle, a presumption is required to be drawn in his favour”.
But, instead of granting him pension in compliance of the high court orders, the Supreme Court Bench of Justices S.K. Kaul and K.M. Joseph found the government opted to harass Mr. Mishra, choosing to file an appeal in the apex court after delaying it by 190 days.
Ordering the government to deposit costs of ₹10,000 in the Advocates’ Welfare Fund within two weeks, the apex court dismissed the Centre’s appeal, saying, “We are surprised that such a matter should have been found fit to be filed in this court. It is a sheer waste of judicial time”.
Mr. Mishra's application for pension dates back to March 1982. He had participated in the Freedom Movement and remained underground from August 1942 to 1946. He had produced government records to support his claim for pension.
The Supreme Court has slammed the Centre for harassing a 90-year-old freedom fighter by filing repeated appeals in higher courts, often at the last minute, to deny him a freedom fighter’s pension.
The government had challenged a Delhi High Court order directing the Centre to pay Dev Narayan Mishra his freedom fighter pension. The High Court attempted to make the government realise that the objective of the pension under the Swatantra Sainik Samman Pension Scheme of 1972 is not to “reward” patriotic men and women who threw their lives into the Freedom Movement, but to honour them and mitigate their suffering.
“The scheme was introduced with the object of providing pension to freedom fighters and families of martyrs,” the High Court had explained to the government in its October 2018 order.
Both the single Judge and Division Bench of the Delhi High Court consistently recognised Mr. Mishra's claim for freedom fighter pension from 2015 onwards.
The High Court said the “standard of proof required in such cases (of freedom fighters) is not as required in criminal cases and once on the basis of evidence it is probable that the respondent (Mishra) had suffered imprisonment during freedom struggle, a presumption is required to be drawn in his favour”.
But, instead of granting him pension in compliance of the high court orders, the Supreme Court Bench of Justices S.K. Kaul and K.M. Joseph found the government opted to harass Mr. Mishra, choosing to file an appeal in the apex court after delaying it by 190 days.
Ordering the government to deposit costs of ₹10,000 in the Advocates’ Welfare Fund within two weeks, the apex court dismissed the Centre’s appeal, saying, “We are surprised that such a matter should have been found fit to be filed in this court. It is a sheer waste of judicial time”.
Mr. Mishra's application for pension dates back to March 1982. He had participated in the Freedom Movement and remained underground from August 1942 to 1946. He had produced government records to support his claim for pension.
No comments:
Post a Comment