Register marriage between man and transwoman: Madurai Bench
The Court has also directed the Health Secretary to issue a G.O. prohibiting sex reassignment surgery on intersex infants and children.
Published: 24th April 2019 05:05 AM |
By Express News Service
MADURAI: The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court ordered registration of marriage between a man and a transwoman from Thoothukudi following a petition seeking a direction to the authorities concerned to register their marriage. The Court has also directed the Health Secretary to issue a G.O. prohibiting sex reassignment surgery on intersex infants and children.
The landmark judgment was passed on April 22 by Justice G R Swaminathan on a petition filed Arunkumar and Sreeja seeking direction to the Registration Department after the department ‘refused’ to register their marriage. The department stated that Sreeja, being a transwoman cannot be placed under the category of ‘bride’ as per the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and that the word ‘bride’ only refers to ‘woman’ on her wedding day.
However, Justice Swaminathan rejected the contentions by observing, “transgender persons who are neither male nor female fall within the expression ‘person’ and hence entitled to legal protection of laws in all spheres of State activity as enjoyed by any other citizen of this country”. Discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation or gender identity, therefore, impairs equality before the law, equal protection of the law and violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India, he added.
Referring to epics Ramayana and Mahabharata, he further held that the existence of a third category had been recognised even in the indigenous Hindu tradition. Hence the expression ‘bride’ occurring in Section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, would have to include within its meaning not only a woman but also a transwoman, he stated and directed the authorities to register the marriage solemnised between the petitioners.
Pointing out that one of the petitioners Arun Kumar belonged to a scheduled caste, the Judge also recommended that they can avail financial incentive under Dr Ambedkar’s Scheme for Social Integration through Inter-Caste Marriages. Justice Swaminathan also noted that intersex children must be given time and space to find their true gender identity. “But the parents make the infant undergo sex reassignment surgery (SRS), without providing them the opportunity (to decide),” he stated and directed the Health Secretary to issue a G.O prohibiting sex reassignment surgery on intersex infants and children.
The Court has also directed the Health Secretary to issue a G.O. prohibiting sex reassignment surgery on intersex infants and children.
Published: 24th April 2019 05:05 AM |
By Express News Service
MADURAI: The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court ordered registration of marriage between a man and a transwoman from Thoothukudi following a petition seeking a direction to the authorities concerned to register their marriage. The Court has also directed the Health Secretary to issue a G.O. prohibiting sex reassignment surgery on intersex infants and children.
The landmark judgment was passed on April 22 by Justice G R Swaminathan on a petition filed Arunkumar and Sreeja seeking direction to the Registration Department after the department ‘refused’ to register their marriage. The department stated that Sreeja, being a transwoman cannot be placed under the category of ‘bride’ as per the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and that the word ‘bride’ only refers to ‘woman’ on her wedding day.
However, Justice Swaminathan rejected the contentions by observing, “transgender persons who are neither male nor female fall within the expression ‘person’ and hence entitled to legal protection of laws in all spheres of State activity as enjoyed by any other citizen of this country”. Discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation or gender identity, therefore, impairs equality before the law, equal protection of the law and violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India, he added.
Referring to epics Ramayana and Mahabharata, he further held that the existence of a third category had been recognised even in the indigenous Hindu tradition. Hence the expression ‘bride’ occurring in Section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, would have to include within its meaning not only a woman but also a transwoman, he stated and directed the authorities to register the marriage solemnised between the petitioners.
Pointing out that one of the petitioners Arun Kumar belonged to a scheduled caste, the Judge also recommended that they can avail financial incentive under Dr Ambedkar’s Scheme for Social Integration through Inter-Caste Marriages. Justice Swaminathan also noted that intersex children must be given time and space to find their true gender identity. “But the parents make the infant undergo sex reassignment surgery (SRS), without providing them the opportunity (to decide),” he stated and directed the Health Secretary to issue a G.O prohibiting sex reassignment surgery on intersex infants and children.
No comments:
Post a Comment