In live-in relationship, sex does not become rape: SC Even Women Should Not Promise To Marry And Break Away: CJI

In live-in relationship, sex does not become rape: SC

Even Women Should Not Promise To Marry And Break Away: CJI

Dhananjay.Mahapatra@timesgroup.com

New Delhi:  02.03.2021 

The Supreme Court on Monday said in a prolonged live-in relationship, consensual sex between a couple could not be categorised as rape if the man failed to keep his promise of marriage to the woman.

“Making a false promise to marry is wrong, Even a woman should not promise to marry and then break away. But that does not mean in a prolonged live-in relationship, the sexual intercourse would be categorised as rape,” a bench of Chief Justice S A Bobde and Justices A S Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian said.

The case related to two call centre employees who were in a live-in relationship for five years. The man finally married another woman, leading to the spurned lover slapping rape charges against the man and accusing him of indulging in sexual intercourse on the false promise of marriage.

Appearing for the man, senior advocate Vibha Datta Makhija said if consensual sex in a live-in relationship between two adults could result in rape charges, which invariably leads to arrest of the man, it would set a dangerous precedent. The complaint's counsel Aditya Vashishth said the man had displayed to the world that they were living as husband and wife and had married the complainant in a temple but had wriggled out of the promise after brutally assaulting the woman and extorting money.

When Makhija said there was a “habitual” aspect to the complainant and alleged that she had done the same to two other men, the bench said using the word “habitual” for rape survivors was impermissible under law. Makhija said she was aware of the sensitivity of the issue but termed the complainant's allegations false.

The bench protected the man from arrest for eight weeks and asked him to find out from trial proceedings whether the prosecution was able to produce evidence to substantiate rape charges. “It is a good case for you to seek discharge from the trial court,” the bench said while disposing of the man's petition.

In 2018, the SC in two successive judgments had held that if a woman was voluntarily in a live-in relationship, it would be difficult to categorise sexual intercourse as rape. In Shivashankar alias Shiva vs Karnataka on April 6, 2018, the SC had said, “It is difficult to hold that sexual intercourse in the course of a relationship which has continued for eight years is 'rape', especially in the face of the complainant's own allegation that they lived together as man and wife.”

Full report onwww.toi.in

The bench protected the man from arrest for eight weeks and asked him to find out from trial proceedings whether the prosecution was able to produce evidence to substantiate rape charges