Bengaluru HC to RGUHS: Make exams transparent
DECCAN CHRONICLE.
Published Jan 4, 2019, 6:45 am IST
Several unsuccessful candidates had approached the HC seeking direction for revaluation of their answer scripts.
Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences
Bengaluru: The High Court recently asked Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (RGUHS) to examine the requests for considering adoption of Model Key Answer System or any other desirable measure for making the present examination system more transparent and efficient.
The court in its order dated December 21, 2018, passed by Justice Krishna S. Dixit passed made the observations with regard to a batch of petitions filed by several unsuccessful students, who had sought for revaluation of their answer scripts.
The court has ordered to look into their individual grievances in relation to pitfalls in the Digital Valuation System.
Several unsuccessful candidates had approached the HC seeking direction for revaluation of their answer scripts. The grievances relate to the refusal of the respondent-University (RGUHS) to send their answer papers for revaluation on the ground that the differential of marks awarded by two evaluators in the case of students of U.G. course and the differential of marks awarded by four evaluators in the case of students of P.G. course are less than 15% of maximum marks prescribed for the papers in the respective exams
DECCAN CHRONICLE.
Published Jan 4, 2019, 6:45 am IST
Several unsuccessful candidates had approached the HC seeking direction for revaluation of their answer scripts.
Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences
Bengaluru: The High Court recently asked Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (RGUHS) to examine the requests for considering adoption of Model Key Answer System or any other desirable measure for making the present examination system more transparent and efficient.
The court in its order dated December 21, 2018, passed by Justice Krishna S. Dixit passed made the observations with regard to a batch of petitions filed by several unsuccessful students, who had sought for revaluation of their answer scripts.
The court has ordered to look into their individual grievances in relation to pitfalls in the Digital Valuation System.
Several unsuccessful candidates had approached the HC seeking direction for revaluation of their answer scripts. The grievances relate to the refusal of the respondent-University (RGUHS) to send their answer papers for revaluation on the ground that the differential of marks awarded by two evaluators in the case of students of U.G. course and the differential of marks awarded by four evaluators in the case of students of P.G. course are less than 15% of maximum marks prescribed for the papers in the respective exams
No comments:
Post a Comment