Issue GO to release pension arrears to retired STC staff: HC
By Express News Service |
Published: 27th December 2017 02:57 AM |
Originally, R Mayandi Servai (82), a
retired TNSTC employee, based in Madurai, sent a post card to another
bench of justices M V Muralidaran and N Seshasayee, when they were
sitting at the vacation bench in Madurai on May 16 last. He claimed that
the benefits due to him had not been settled even after 24 years after
retirement. There were 100s of similarly-placed employees. Taking a
serious note of the post card, Justice Muralidaran had directed the High
Court registry to treat it as a suo-motu PIL. Thereafter, the case was
transferred to the principal seat of the High Court in Chennai and
posted before the present bench.
When the matter came up on December 22,
Advocate-General N Vijay Narayan submitted that in spite of heavy
financial crisis faced, action was being taken to release an advance of
`175 crore towards settlement of remaining statutory dues to the
retired employees of State Transport Undertakings. Necessary GO would be
issued shortly, he said.
The bench noted that as ordered earlier,
`379 crore ought to have been sanctioned and disbursed by December 15
last as the second instalment towards arrears to the retired employees
under various heads. However, `175 crore alone is sought to be
sanctioned, due to financial crunch.
The AG submitted that as the Transport
Minister was out of station, the GO could not be issued immediately, but
assured that the same would be issued forthwith, enabling disbursement
of `175 crore towards settlement of the statutory dues, to the retired
staff by December 26. The matter has been posted for further hearing on
January 3.
Suo motu PIL from a post card
R Mayandi Servai (82), a retired TNSTC
staff, sent a post card to a bench of Justices on May 16 last. He
claimed that benefits due to him had not been settled even 24 years
after retirement. There were 100s of similarly-placed staff. Taking a
serious note of the post card, Justice Muralidaran directed the HC
registry to treat it as a suo-motu PIL.
No comments:
Post a Comment